Explainable machine learning for predicting grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events in resectable non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy: predominant contribution of hematologic toxicity.
6 affiliations
- 1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
- 2Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shandong Public Health Clinical Center Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
- 3First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
- 4Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anhui Chest Hospital, Hefei, China.
- 5Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China.
- 6Department of Pathology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy improves outcomes for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but can cause severe treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Pretreatment models for predicting grade ≥3 TRAEs during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy remain limited. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an explainable machine learning model for predicting grade ≥3 TRAEs in patients with resectable NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. This multicenter retrospective study included a discovery cohort (n=953) and an independent external validation cohort (n=143). The discovery cohort was stratified into training (n=668) and internal test (n=285) sets. Pretreatment candidates included routine clinical and laboratory variables and first-cycle treatment characteristics. Stability-oriented Boruta selection was used for variable selection, followed by variance inflation factor (VIF) assessment. Eight machine learning (ML) algorithms were tuned using 10-fold cross-validation in the training set. Discrimination, calibration, decision curve analysis (DCA), and explanations based on SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were evaluated. Secondary analyses assessed hematologic, nonhematologic, and immune-related adverse event (irAE) endpoints. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 496 of 1,096 patients (45.3%); 464 patients (42.3%) experienced grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity, and 446 (89.9% of patients with grade ≥3 TRAEs) reached the composite endpoint exclusively because of hematologic events. The final random forest model incorporating 12 pretreatment predictors achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.782 and 0.742 in the internal test and external validation cohorts, respectively. When the locked overall-TRAE model was applied to toxicity subtypes, discrimination was maintained for grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity (AUCs, 0.764 and 0.732) but was substantially weaker for grade ≥3 nonhematologic toxicity (0.638 and 0.631) and any-grade irAEs (0.435 and 0.535). The hematologic toxicity-specific model achieved AUCs of 0.777 and 0.711 in the internal test and external validation cohorts, respectively. The pretreatment random forest model showed moderate external discrimination for overall grade ≥3 TRAEs, primarily reflecting hematologic toxicity.
Related
- Skeletal muscle depletion during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy predicts postoperative complications in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study
- AI expert collaborative generative model for predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC
- Is pneumonectomy appropriate after chemoimmunotherapy? Outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by pneumonectomy in the United States.
- Response-Adapted Postoperative Therapy Following Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a phase II trial
- Lymph Node Regression Improves Prognostic Stratification in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.
BibTeX
@article{zhi2026explainable,
title = {{Explainable machine learning for predicting grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events in resectable non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy: predominant contribution of hematologic toxicity.}},
author = {Fei-Hang Zhi and Yunzeng Zhang and Tengfei Ge and Lei Yang and Yichen Dong and Jialiang Wen and Haojie Si and Jingyu Chen and Yuzhou Wang and Delun Yang and Yicheng Wang and Minglei Yang and Huikang Xie and Junqi Wu and Long Xu and Deping Zhao and Chang Chen},
journal = {Translational lung cancer research},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.21037/tlcr-2026-0984},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42999415},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Explainable machine learning for predicting grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events in resectable non-small cell lung cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy: predominant contribution of hematologic toxicity.
AU - Fei-Hang Zhi
AU - Yunzeng Zhang
AU - Tengfei Ge
AU - Lei Yang
AU - Yichen Dong
AU - Jialiang Wen
AU - Haojie Si
AU - Jingyu Chen
AU - Yuzhou Wang
AU - Delun Yang
AU - Yicheng Wang
AU - Minglei Yang
AU - Huikang Xie
AU - Junqi Wu
AU - Long Xu
AU - Deping Zhao
AU - Chang Chen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/29
JO - Translational lung cancer research
DO - 10.21037/tlcr-2026-0984
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42999415
AB - Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy improves outcomes for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but can cause severe treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Pretreatment models for predicting grade ≥3 TRAEs during neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy remain limited. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an explainable machine learning model for predicting grade ≥3 TRAEs in patients with resectable NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. This multicenter retrospective study included a discovery cohort (n=953) and an independent external validation cohort (n=143). The discovery cohort was stratified into training (n=668) and internal test (n=285) sets. Pretreatment candidates included routine clinical and laboratory variables and first-cycle treatment characteristics. Stability-oriented Boruta selection was used for variable selection, followed by variance inflation factor (VIF) assessment. Eight machine learning (ML) algorithms were tuned using 10-fold cross-validation in the training set. Discrimination, calibration, decision curve analysis (DCA), and explanations based on SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were evaluated. Secondary analyses assessed hematologic, nonhematologic, and immune-related adverse event (irAE) endpoints. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 496 of 1,096 patients (45.3%); 464 patients (42.3%) experienced grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity, and 446 (89.9% of patients with grade ≥3 TRAEs) reached the composite endpoint exclusively because of hematologic events. The final random forest model incorporating 12 pretreatment predictors achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.782 and 0.742 in the internal test and external validation cohorts, respectively. When the locked overall-TRAE model was applied to toxicity subtypes, discrimination was maintained for grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity (AUCs, 0.764 and 0.732) but was substantially weaker for grade ≥3 nonhematologic toxicity (0.638 and 0.631) and any-grade irAEs (0.435 and 0.535). The hematologic toxicity-specific model achieved AUCs of 0.777 and 0.711 in the internal test and external validation cohorts, respectively. The pretreatment random forest model showed moderate external discrimination for overall grade ≥3 TRAEs, primarily reflecting hematologic toxicity.
SN - 2218-6751
SN - 2226-4477
ER -