Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,785 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYHippocampus

The Strength of Target Representations Drives Mnemonic Discrimination: Evidence From Extended Delay and Hippocampal Damage.

5 affiliations
  1. 1MindCORE, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  2. 2Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. 3Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  4. 4St. Luke's Rehabilitation Hospital, Boise, Idaho, USA.
  5. 5Department of Psychology & Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.

Abstract

Mnemonic discrimination is critical for episodic memory and is dependent on the computational process of pattern separation, which allows the memory system to disambiguate prior memories from potentially overlapping new memories and avoid interference. Prior work with tasks such as the Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST) has demonstrated that discrimination performance is disproportionately affected by hippocampal insult. Further studies have demonstrated that the quality of initial encoding may affect subsequent discrimination performance. Taken together, these results imply that the strength of target memory representations determines discrimination performance in the MST. Here, we manipulated target memory strength by examining MST performance at delays ranging from a few minutes to seven days in three experiments with healthy young adults and a patient with hippocampal damage. Consistent with prior forgetting literature, both target recognition and lure discrimination declined with delay in controls. In the immediate delay condition, the similarity of lures to targets drove discrimination performance, with more similar lures eliciting false alarms and less similar lures eliciting correct rejections, as reflected in the lure discrimination index (LDI). This graded relationship was attenuated or absent at delays longer than one day. However, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses revealed preserved discrimination across delays and target-lure similarity levels. Similarly, the hippocampal patient was impaired relative to controls when considering LDI, but ROC-based analysis revealed intact lure discrimination for the lowest-similarity lures at immediate delays. Finally, we observed an inversion of the typical confidence-accuracy relationship for lure trials at longer delays, with low-confidence responses more likely to be correct for high-similarity lures. Together these findings demonstrate that both the strength of target representations and the degree of lure similarity interact to drive discrimination performance.

Related

  1. An operant-based touchscreen morph discrimination task does not detect age-related mnemonic similarity deficits in rats.
    Aleyna Ross, Carly N Logan, John J Thompson +7
    Oxford open neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  2. Association of object mnemonic discrimination deficit with age and AD biomarkers in older adults
    Z. Yang, X. Zhuang, L. M. Bekris +10
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Hippocampal-Prefrontal Cortical Interactions and Neural Representations of Memory
    Denisse Morales-Rodriguez, Loren M. Frank
    Current biology : CBPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textNeurosciencePMC
  4. Plasticity degeneracy underlies flexible formation and reconfiguration of spatial representations in hippocampal granule cells
    S. Kumari, R. Narayanan
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Shared neural geometries for bilingual semantic representations in human hippocampal neurons
    Xinyuan Yan, Ana G. Chavez, Melissa C. Franch +20
    CellPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text8 citedNeuroscienceOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{kirwan2026strength,
  title = {{The Strength of Target Representations Drives Mnemonic Discrimination: Evidence From Extended Delay and Hippocampal Damage.}},
  author = {C Brock Kirwan and Samuel P Chipman and Martina K Hollearn and Cory S Inman and Michaela S Shields and Derin Cobia},
  journal = {Hippocampus},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/hipo.70141},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897927},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The Strength of Target Representations Drives Mnemonic Discrimination: Evidence From Extended Delay and Hippocampal Damage.
AU  - C Brock Kirwan
AU  - Samuel P Chipman
AU  - Martina K Hollearn
AU  - Cory S Inman
AU  - Michaela S Shields
AU  - Derin Cobia
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Hippocampus
DO  - 10.1002/hipo.70141
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897927
AB  - Mnemonic discrimination is critical for episodic memory and is dependent on the computational process of pattern separation, which allows the memory system to disambiguate prior memories from potentially overlapping new memories and avoid interference. Prior work with tasks such as the Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST) has demonstrated that discrimination performance is disproportionately affected by hippocampal insult. Further studies have demonstrated that the quality of initial encoding may affect subsequent discrimination performance. Taken together, these results imply that the strength of target memory representations determines discrimination performance in the MST. Here, we manipulated target memory strength by examining MST performance at delays ranging from a few minutes to seven days in three experiments with healthy young adults and a patient with hippocampal damage. Consistent with prior forgetting literature, both target recognition and lure discrimination declined with delay in controls. In the immediate delay condition, the similarity of lures to targets drove discrimination performance, with more similar lures eliciting false alarms and less similar lures eliciting correct rejections, as reflected in the lure discrimination index (LDI). This graded relationship was attenuated or absent at delays longer than one day. However, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses revealed preserved discrimination across delays and target-lure similarity levels. Similarly, the hippocampal patient was impaired relative to controls when considering LDI, but ROC-based analysis revealed intact lure discrimination for the lowest-similarity lures at immediate delays. Finally, we observed an inversion of the typical confidence-accuracy relationship for lure trials at longer delays, with low-confidence responses more likely to be correct for high-similarity lures. Together these findings demonstrate that both the strength of target representations and the degree of lure similarity interact to drive discrimination performance.
SN  - 1050-9631
SN  - 1098-1063
ER  -