Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Two Linear Programs are Better than One

Abstract

The extension complexity xc(P) of a polytope P is the minimum number of facets of a polytope that projects onto it. Motivated by the complexity of neural networks, Hertrich and Loho introduced the virtual extension complexity vxc(P) of a polytope P, which is the minimum of xc(Q) + xc(R) among all polytopes Q and R such that P+Q=R. We show the following results pertaining to virtual extension complexity. First, we resolve the core open problem on the topic by showing the virtual extension complexity can be exponentially smaller than extension complexity. Second, we show there are matroid base polytopes with exponential virtual extension complexity by adapting a semi-algebraic counting argument by Hrubeš that extends the counting arguments of Rothvoss. Finally, we show that the maximum virtual extension complexity of a polygon with n vertices is Θ(√n). This resolves an analogue of a question on extension complexity of Fiorini, Rothvoss, and Tiwary in 2011 in the case of virtual extension complexity.

Related

  1. Are continuous models better than areal models for spatial disease mapping with a large number of small areas?
    Ismael Salcedo, Camelia Trandafir, Tomás Goicoa +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Better than square-root cancellation and Gaussian behavior on Piatetski-Shapiro Sequences
    Renjie Zhu, Tianping Zhang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  3. A Better-Than-$3$ Approximation Algorithm for Demand Matching via Knapsack Intersection LP and Contention Resolution
    Michel X. Goemans, Yuchong Pan
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. Evolving Towards Better Codes: LLM-Guided Search for High-Distance Binary Linear Codes
    Amal Seddas, Vladyslav Shashkov, Maryna Viazovska +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  5. Feasibility Correction in Linear Programs
    Pedro Abdalla, Roman Vershynin, Guangyi Zou
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{black2026linear,
  title = {{Two Linear Programs are Better than One}},
  author = {Alexander E. Black and Christoph Hertrich and Stefan Kober and Georg Loho},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.15909},
  eprint = {2610.15909},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15909},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Two Linear Programs are Better than One
AU  - Alexander E. Black
AU  - Christoph Hertrich
AU  - Stefan Kober
AU  - Georg Loho
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/11
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.15909
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15909
AB  - The extension complexity xc(P) of a polytope P is the minimum number of facets of a polytope that projects onto it. Motivated by the complexity of neural networks, Hertrich and Loho introduced the virtual extension complexity vxc(P) of a polytope P, which is the minimum of xc(Q) + xc(R) among all polytopes Q and R such that P+Q=R. We show the following results pertaining to virtual extension complexity. First, we resolve the core open problem on the topic by showing the virtual extension complexity can be exponentially smaller than extension complexity. Second, we show there are matroid base polytopes with exponential virtual extension complexity by adapting a semi-algebraic counting argument by Hrubeš that extends the counting arguments of Rothvoss. Finally, we show that the maximum virtual extension complexity of a polygon with n vertices is Θ(√n). This resolves an analogue of a question on extension complexity of Fiorini, Rothvoss, and Tiwary in 2011 in the case of virtual extension complexity.
ER  -