Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 27 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYPharmaceutics

Artificial Intelligence in Nanopharmaceutical Development: From Predictive Design to Clinical Translation

  1. 1Universidade Federal do Paraná

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly influencing nanopharmaceutical development by supporting the transition from empirical formulation screening toward predictive, data-driven, and translationally oriented design. Nanocarrier-based therapeutics are governed by nonlinear relationships among material composition, physicochemical attributes, manufacturing parameters, biological identity, pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and therapeutic performance. In this review, we examine how AI can contribute to nanopharmaceutical development from predictive formulation design to clinical translation. We synthesize current applications of machine learning, deep learning, physics-informed modeling, hybrid mechanistic-AI approaches, and automated optimization workflows, with emphasis on critical quality attribute modeling, multi-objective optimization, design of experiments, quality-by-design, process analytical technology, digital twins, and continuous manufacturing. We also discuss applications involving nano-bio interactions, pharmacokinetics, toxicity, immunogenicity, and precision nanomedicine. AI-based approaches can support rational nanocarrier design, identify nonlinear formulation-property relationships, guide optimization, improve process understanding, and integrate heterogeneous experimental, biological, and manufacturing datasets across diverse nanopharmaceutical platforms. These methods are particularly relevant for modeling protein corona formation, cellular uptake, intracellular trafficking, biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, toxicity, immunogenicity, and patient-specific responses. However, translational implementation remains limited by fragmented datasets, inconsistent reporting standards, limited interpretability, insufficient external validation, uncertain predictions, poorly defined applicability domains, and evolving regulatory expectations for adaptive computational models. Overall, AI should be viewed not only as an optimization tool, but also as a translational framework connecting formulation science, biological prediction, manufacturing control, and clinical implementation. Future progress will depend on standardized data infrastructures, explainable and externally validated models, uncertainty quantification, applicability-domain definition, hybrid mechanistic-AI frameworks, regulatory-ready documentation, and clinically relevant case studies.

Related

  1. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Nanomedicine in Precision Oncology: Diagnosis, Targeted Therapy, and Clinical Translation.
    Ruba Altahla, Yongping Wang, Mahdi Morshedi Yekta +7
    International journal of nanomedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textMaterials & polymersEurope PMCPMC
  2. A Risk-Tiered Validation Framework for Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery: From Reproducibility to Clinical Translation
    Sarfaraz K. Niazi
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY7 citedMedicinal chemistry & drug discoveryOpenAlex
  3. Bone morphogenetic protein 4 meets artificial intelligence: a comprehensive review of AI-driven advances in drug discovery, structural modeling, and clinical translation
    Wanli Sun, Tongtong Huo, Zhewei Ye +3
    Frontiers in molecular biosciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedicinal chemistry & drug discoveryEurope PMCPMC
  4. Artificial Intelligence in drug discovery and development: current landscape, challenges, and future perspectives
    Attila A. Seyhan, Claudio Carini
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/HematologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND6 citedMedicinal chemistry & drug discoveryOpenAlex
  5. Systematic Evaluation of Mixture-Design for Multi-Oxide Magnesium Aluminosilicate Glass Development: Model Comparison, Modifier Interactions, and Predictive Limitations
    Muawia Dafir, Holger Cebulla, Martin Kilo
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
BibTeX
@article{goncalves2026artificial,
  title = {{Artificial Intelligence in Nanopharmaceutical Development: From Predictive Design to Clinical Translation}},
  author = {Renato Sonchini Gonçalves},
  journal = {Pharmaceutics},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.3390/pharmaceutics18060764},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18060764},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Artificial Intelligence in Nanopharmaceutical Development: From Predictive Design to Clinical Translation
AU  - Renato Sonchini Gonçalves
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/22
JO  - Pharmaceutics
DO  - 10.3390/pharmaceutics18060764
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18060764
AB  - Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly influencing nanopharmaceutical development by supporting the transition from empirical formulation screening toward predictive, data-driven, and translationally oriented design. Nanocarrier-based therapeutics are governed by nonlinear relationships among material composition, physicochemical attributes, manufacturing parameters, biological identity, pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and therapeutic performance. In this review, we examine how AI can contribute to nanopharmaceutical development from predictive formulation design to clinical translation. We synthesize current applications of machine learning, deep learning, physics-informed modeling, hybrid mechanistic-AI approaches, and automated optimization workflows, with emphasis on critical quality attribute modeling, multi-objective optimization, design of experiments, quality-by-design, process analytical technology, digital twins, and continuous manufacturing. We also discuss applications involving nano-bio interactions, pharmacokinetics, toxicity, immunogenicity, and precision nanomedicine. AI-based approaches can support rational nanocarrier design, identify nonlinear formulation-property relationships, guide optimization, improve process understanding, and integrate heterogeneous experimental, biological, and manufacturing datasets across diverse nanopharmaceutical platforms. These methods are particularly relevant for modeling protein corona formation, cellular uptake, intracellular trafficking, biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, toxicity, immunogenicity, and patient-specific responses. However, translational implementation remains limited by fragmented datasets, inconsistent reporting standards, limited interpretability, insufficient external validation, uncertain predictions, poorly defined applicability domains, and evolving regulatory expectations for adaptive computational models. Overall, AI should be viewed not only as an optimization tool, but also as a translational framework connecting formulation science, biological prediction, manufacturing control, and clinical implementation. Future progress will depend on standardized data infrastructures, explainable and externally validated models, uncertainty quantification, applicability-domain definition, hybrid mechanistic-AI frameworks, regulatory-ready documentation, and clinically relevant case studies.
SN  - 1999-4923
ER  -