Coordination Alone Does Not Passivate Surface Halide-Vacancy States in Lead Halide Perovskites
Abstract
Molecular passivation of halide vacancies at lead-halide perovskite surfaces is conventionally attributed to Lewis-base coordination of undercoordinated Pb2+ sites. Density functional theory with spin–orbit coupling on FA0.75MA0.25PbI3 (001) shows this premise is electronically insufficient. Across ten additives, no coordination metric predicts which additives passivate: molybdic acid coordinates at 2.346 Å (−1.14 e) yet leaves the localized Pb(6p) defect trap intact (p = 0.128; +0.29 eV in HSE06), whereas permanganic acid coordinates at 2.156 Å (−1.06 e) and clears it (p ≤ 0.002). The outcomes exhibit discrete bimodal separation (Ashman’s D = 23.11) governed by specific interfacial chemistry: proton transfer forming a hydridic Pb–H bond (H2SO4, p = 0.008) or charge-transfer depopulation into an accessible acceptor manifold (HMnO4). This mechanism rationalizes the observed processing sensitivity of phosphate additives. Screening additives by coordination geometry cannot identify passivants; targeting proton delivery or redox-accessible acceptor levels can.
Related
- Energy-level alignment of vacancy-ordered halide double perovskites
- Role of local disorder in surface properties of inorganic halide perovskites
- Chirality as a Structural Degree of Freedom in Halide Perovskites
- The Intrinsic Photochemical (in)-Stability of Lead Halide Perovskites
- Disentangling Electronic and Lattice Contributions to Transient Absorption in Metal Halide Perovskites: A First-Principles Study of CH3NH3PbBr3.
BibTeX
@misc{msigwa2026coordination,
title = {{Coordination Alone Does Not Passivate Surface Halide-Vacancy States in Lead Halide Perovskites}},
author = {Christopher Gaspar Msigwa and Muhammad Mateen and Shibing Chu},
howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15008619/v1},
url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15008619/v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Coordination Alone Does Not Passivate Surface Halide-Vacancy States in Lead Halide Perovskites
AU - Christopher Gaspar Msigwa
AU - Muhammad Mateen
AU - Shibing Chu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/10
PB - ChemRxiv
DO - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15008619/v1
UR - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15008619/v1
AB - Molecular passivation of halide vacancies at lead-halide perovskite surfaces is conventionally attributed to Lewis-base coordination of undercoordinated Pb2+ sites. Density functional theory with spin–orbit coupling on FA0.75MA0.25PbI3 (001) shows this premise is electronically insufficient. Across ten additives, no coordination metric predicts which additives passivate: molybdic acid coordinates at 2.346 Å (−1.14 e) yet leaves the localized Pb(6p) defect trap intact (p = 0.128; +0.29 eV in HSE06), whereas permanganic acid coordinates at 2.156 Å (−1.06 e) and clears it (p ≤ 0.002). The outcomes exhibit discrete bimodal separation (Ashman’s D = 23.11) governed by specific interfacial chemistry: proton transfer forming a hydridic Pb–H bond (H2SO4, p = 0.008) or charge-transfer depopulation into an accessible acceptor manifold (HMnO4). This mechanism rationalizes the observed processing sensitivity of phosphate additives. Screening additives by coordination geometry cannot identify passivants; targeting proton delivery or redox-accessible acceptor levels can.
ER -