Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,860 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0The European Physical Journal C

Near extremal RN–AdS control of holographic Josephson transport

  1. 1Eastern Mediterranean University
  2. 2Mapúa University

Abstract

We formulate a holographic weak-link construction in which Josephson transport is controlled by a near-extremal Reissner–Nordstrom–AdS background while the superconducting junction is carried by a dynamically distinct Abelian-Higgs probe sector. The RN–AdS geometry is supported by a homogeneous background Maxwell field ℬμ , B μ , whereas the junction gauge field Aμ A μ and charged scalar Ψ Ψ enter the action with an overall factor λ 2. λ 2 . After deriving the field equations, the limit λ → 0 λ → 0 leaves the nonlinear Maxwell–scalar equations intact on a fixed RN–AdS geometry while their stress tensor affects the metric only at 𝒪(λ 2). O ( λ 2 ) . This makes the fixed-background approximation a controlled leading-order truncation even for a finite spatial modulation of the probe chemical potential. The Josephson phase difference is defined from the gauge-invariant boundary data of the probe condensate, not from the RN charge itself. We identify the current-phase relation, critical current, coherence length, and small-phase stiffness as the principal transport quantities. In the SNS regime, the critical current and midpoint condensate probe the same spatial proximity scale, while higher harmonics diagnose enhanced transparency or departure from the opaque weak-link limit. The near-extremal RN–AdS throat introduces a radial scale distinct from the spatial proximity length. We derive its domain of validity and distinguish the AdS 2 2 response coefficient from the Josephson current obtained after ultraviolet matching. For the canonical scalar mass m2L2=−2, m 2 L 2 = - 2 , the homogeneous normal probe throat violates the AdS 2 2 stability bound at extremality for every real probe electric field. A real-index power law therefore requires a different stable reference sector and a separate derivation of its overlap with the junction response. The analysis provides a probe formulation, analytic proximity references, and infrared constraints; it does not constitute a numerical solution of the nonlinear RN–AdS junction.

Related

  1. Kibble-Zurek Mechanism and Current-Phase Relation in a Holographic Josephson Junction
    Zhi-Hong Li, Huai-Fan Li, Hai-Qing Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  2. Collective excitation-mediated transport in nanoscale Josephson junctions that exhibit quantum confinement
    Zhengyuan Liu, Sebastian Scherb, Werner M. J. van Weerdenburg +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  3. Local Josephson response near nonmagnetic impurities and vortices in a two-orbital s± superconductor
    Yuanyuan Zhao
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  4. Majorana-like Josephson branch structure in one-dimensional transport of cold atoms
    Rory Whelan, Dimitri M. Gangardt, Igor V. Lerner
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCondensed matterarXiv
  5. Structural control of two-level defect density revealed by high-throughput correlative measurements of Josephson junctions
    Oliver F. Wolff, Harshvardhan Mantry, Rahim Raja +8
    npj Quantum InformationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text2 citedQuantum physics & quantum informationCrossref
BibTeX
@article{ovgun2026near,
  title = {{Near extremal RN–AdS control of holographic Josephson transport}},
  author = {Ali Övgün and Reggie C. Pantig},
  journal = {The European Physical Journal C},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16438-w},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16438-w},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Near extremal RN–AdS control of holographic Josephson transport
AU  - Ali Övgün
AU  - Reggie C. Pantig
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
JO  - The European Physical Journal C
DO  - 10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16438-w
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-16438-w
AB  - We formulate a holographic weak-link construction in which Josephson transport is controlled by a near-extremal Reissner–Nordstrom–AdS background while the superconducting junction is carried by a dynamically distinct Abelian-Higgs probe sector. The RN–AdS geometry is supported by a homogeneous background Maxwell field ℬ_μ , B μ , whereas the junction gauge field A_μ A μ and charged scalar Ψ Ψ enter the action with an overall factor λ ^2. λ 2 . After deriving the field equations, the limit λ → 0 λ → 0 leaves the nonlinear Maxwell–scalar equations intact on a fixed RN–AdS geometry while their stress tensor affects the metric only at 𝒪(λ ^2). O ( λ 2 ) . This makes the fixed-background approximation a controlled leading-order truncation even for a finite spatial modulation of the probe chemical potential. The Josephson phase difference is defined from the gauge-invariant boundary data of the probe condensate, not from the RN charge itself. We identify the current-phase relation, critical current, coherence length, and small-phase stiffness as the principal transport quantities. In the SNS regime, the critical current and midpoint condensate probe the same spatial proximity scale, while higher harmonics diagnose enhanced transparency or departure from the opaque weak-link limit. The near-extremal RN–AdS throat introduces a radial scale distinct from the spatial proximity length. We derive its domain of validity and distinguish the AdS _2 2 response coefficient from the Josephson current obtained after ultraviolet matching. For the canonical scalar mass m^2L^2=−2, m 2 L 2 = - 2 , the homogeneous normal probe throat violates the AdS _2 2 stability bound at extremality for every real probe electric field. A real-index power law therefore requires a different stable reference sector and a separate derivation of its overlap with the junction response. The analysis provides a probe formulation, analytic proximity references, and infrared constraints; it does not constitute a numerical solution of the nonlinear RN–AdS junction.
SN  - 1434-6044
SN  - 1434-6052
ER  -