Colloidal gel morphology and phase behavior differs based on the electrostatic interaction model in concentrated electrolytes
Abstract
Predicting how nanoparticles interact in concentrated electrolytes remains a central challenge in nanoscience, with implications spanning energy storage, catalysis, and soft materials design. While Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory provides a widely used framework for modeling colloidal interactions, its electrostatic component relies on electric double-layer (EDL) theories whose validity in ionic liquids and concentrated electrolytes is consistently debated. Experiments have revealed significant deviations from classical screening behavior, including underscreening and oscillatory charge ordering, yet the consequences of these nonclassical effects for collective nanoparticle behavior remain unresolved. Here, we demonstrate that the extended range and oscillatory nature of electrostatic screening in concentrated electrolytes predicts different phase behavior and morphology of colloidal ionogels, yielding distinct thermodynamic signatures, percolation thresholds, and amorphous network structures. Using molecular dynamics simulations with DLVO-type pair interactions parameterized by competing EDL models, we systematically compare the consequences of different screening theories on gel formation and configurations.
Related
- Electrostatic Interaction-Induced Assembly of Colloidal Photonic Crystals on Polyester Yarns Applied for Structurally Colored Fabrics with High Breathability and Colorfastness
- Machine-Learning Molecular Dynamics Reveals Grotthuss Transport in Concentrated Electrolytes
- Closing of density wake in concentrated colloidal suspensions: two regimes governed by compressibility, friction, and self-propulsion
- Molecular interpretability of the bulk electrochemical impedance of concentrated electrolytes
- Colloid-Colloid Interactions Impact Network Morphology of Confined Colloidal Drying Patterns
BibTeX
@misc{lim2026colloidal,
title = {{Colloidal gel morphology and phase behavior differs based on the electrostatic interaction model in concentrated electrolytes}},
author = {Hwigwang Lim and Caleb Youngwerth and Lisa Je and Matthew Gebbie and Rose K. Cersonsky},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.00419},
eprint = {2611.00419},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00419},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Colloidal gel morphology and phase behavior differs based on the electrostatic interaction model in concentrated electrolytes
AU - Hwigwang Lim
AU - Caleb Youngwerth
AU - Lisa Je
AU - Matthew Gebbie
AU - Rose K. Cersonsky
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/01
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.00419
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00419
AB - Predicting how nanoparticles interact in concentrated electrolytes remains a central challenge in nanoscience, with implications spanning energy storage, catalysis, and soft materials design. While Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory provides a widely used framework for modeling colloidal interactions, its electrostatic component relies on electric double-layer (EDL) theories whose validity in ionic liquids and concentrated electrolytes is consistently debated. Experiments have revealed significant deviations from classical screening behavior, including underscreening and oscillatory charge ordering, yet the consequences of these nonclassical effects for collective nanoparticle behavior remain unresolved. Here, we demonstrate that the extended range and oscillatory nature of electrostatic screening in concentrated electrolytes predicts different phase behavior and morphology of colloidal ionogels, yielding distinct thermodynamic signatures, percolation thresholds, and amorphous network structures. Using molecular dynamics simulations with DLVO-type pair interactions parameterized by competing EDL models, we systematically compare the consequences of different screening theories on gel formation and configurations.
ER -