Depth and Procedure Specific Effects of Antimicrobial Versus Conventional Sutures on Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
- 1College of Medicine Northeast Ohio Medical University Rootstown Ohio USA
- 2Department of Surgery Northeast Ohio Medical University Rootstown Ohio USA
- 3Department of Biomedical Sciences Northeast Ohio Medical University Rootstown Ohio USA
Abstract
Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common postoperative complications that delay wound healing and increase morbidity and healthcare costs. Conventional sutures lack antimicrobial properties and may act as a nidus for infection. Antimicrobial‐coated sutures have been proposed to reduce SSI rates. This systematic review synthesizes literature comparing traditional and antimicrobial sutures regarding SSIs and wound healing to inform clinical guidelines and future research.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and VHL were searched on March 25, 2025, using terms related to antimicrobial sutures, traditional sutures, and surgical site infection. Two independent reviewers screened studies by title and abstract, followed by full‐text review using predefined eligibility criteria. Included studies were original investigations in English involving live human subjects.
Results: Included studies primarily evaluated absorbable sutures, most commonly polyglactin 910 and polydioxanone, with antimicrobial variants incorporating triclosan or chlorhexidine. Antimicrobial sutures did not significantly reduce superficial SSI (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69–1.24, p = 0.59) but were associated with a 36% reduction in deep SSI (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.93, p = 0.02). Significant reductions were observed in abdominal (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39–0.97, p = 0.04) and colorectal procedures (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45–0.80, p = 0.0004), but not in vascular or cardiothoracic surgery. In procedures demonstrating significant benefit, the incremental cost of antimicrobial sutures was lower than the estimated cost of treating SSI.
Conclusion: Antimicrobial sutures reduce deep, but not superficial, SSIs, with most benefit in abdominal and colorectal procedures. This supports selective, risk‐stratified implementation of antimicrobial sutures.
Related
- GLP-1 receptor agonists in elective spine surgery: a systematic review of fusion outcomes, perioperative safety, and procedure-specific risk
- PROSPECT guideline for total hip arthroplasty: updated systematic review and procedure‐specific postoperative pain management recommendations
- Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy procedure versus conventional two‐stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis
- Schistosoma-Salmonella co-infection in Africa: Epidemiology, biological mechanisms, and antimicrobial resistance: A systematic review and meta analysis
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Severity and Population-Specific Outcomes of Human Metapneumovirus Infection.
BibTeX
@article{muakkassa2026depth,
title = {{Depth and Procedure Specific Effects of Antimicrobial Versus Conventional Sutures on Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis}},
author = {Ryan Muakkassa and Andrew Roach and Ahmed Adham R. Elsayed and Marc D. Basson},
journal = {Anz Journal of Surgery},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.1111/ans.70805},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70805},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Depth and Procedure Specific Effects of Antimicrobial Versus Conventional Sutures on Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
AU - Ryan Muakkassa
AU - Andrew Roach
AU - Ahmed Adham R. Elsayed
AU - Marc D. Basson
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/25
JO - Anz Journal of Surgery
DO - 10.1111/ans.70805
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70805
AB - Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common postoperative complications that delay wound healing and increase morbidity and healthcare costs. Conventional sutures lack antimicrobial properties and may act as a nidus for infection. Antimicrobial‐coated sutures have been proposed to reduce SSI rates. This systematic review synthesizes literature comparing traditional and antimicrobial sutures regarding SSIs and wound healing to inform clinical guidelines and future research. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and VHL were searched on March 25, 2025, using terms related to antimicrobial sutures, traditional sutures, and surgical site infection. Two independent reviewers screened studies by title and abstract, followed by full‐text review using predefined eligibility criteria. Included studies were original investigations in English involving live human subjects. Results: Included studies primarily evaluated absorbable sutures, most commonly polyglactin 910 and polydioxanone, with antimicrobial variants incorporating triclosan or chlorhexidine. Antimicrobial sutures did not significantly reduce superficial SSI (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69–1.24, p = 0.59) but were associated with a 36% reduction in deep SSI (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.93, p = 0.02). Significant reductions were observed in abdominal (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39–0.97, p = 0.04) and colorectal procedures (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45–0.80, p = 0.0004), but not in vascular or cardiothoracic surgery. In procedures demonstrating significant benefit, the incremental cost of antimicrobial sutures was lower than the estimated cost of treating SSI. Conclusion: Antimicrobial sutures reduce deep, but not superficial, SSIs, with most benefit in abdominal and colorectal procedures. This supports selective, risk‐stratified implementation of antimicrobial sutures.
SN - 1445-1433
SN - 1445-2197
ER -