Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,869 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0arXiv

Canonical Layer Inference for Deep Gaussian Processes via Symmetry-Breaking Augmentation

Abstract

Deep Gaussian processes (DGPs) are flexible priors for compositional regression functions, but inference for intermediate layers faces questions. The basic obstruction is an adjacent-layer symmetry: applying an invertible transformation and its inverse to two adjacent layers leaves the composed regression map unchanged. Under explicit symmetry and prior-comparability conditions, we show that the posterior may not concentrate on any prescribed intermediate-layer representation, even when the composed regression function is estimable. We then introduce an augmented ρ-fractional posterior that reweights layer decompositions by a non-saturating identity-deviation penalty. The augmentation changes posterior odds between symmetry-related decompositions by an exponential penalty ratio. Under proper choices of the penalty and a prior mass condition, it preserves function-level fractional posterior contraction, while shrinking the redundant layers towards the identity mapping. Thus, the likelihood does not identify a unique ``true'' set of layers; the augmentation favors identity-biased parsimonious decompositions within an equivalence class of layers; uniqueness of a selected representative is not established.

Related

  1. Local increment inference for time-inhomogeneous drift in Gaussian processes
    Yasutaka Shimizu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Neural Simulation-Based Inference for space-time Gaussian processes
    Alexandre Loret, Lucia Clarotto, Nicolas Desassis +1
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textStatisticsHALarXiv
  3. Adaptive multi-resolution Gaussian processes: Scalable exact inference with naturally data-sparse covariance matrices
    Yanchuang Cao, Jun Liu, Tengchao Yu +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Penalized Likelihood Inference in Highly Multivariate Sparse Spectral Graphical Gaussian Processes
    Bo-yu Chen, Drew Yarger, Anindya Bhadra
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. An invariant variational proof for canonical processes with independent symmetric log-concave tails
    Witold Bednorz, Rafal Martynek, Rafal Meller
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{zhu2026canonical,
  title = {{Canonical Layer Inference for Deep Gaussian Processes via Symmetry-Breaking Augmentation}},
  author = {Yichen Zhu and Hengrui Luo},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.23842},
  eprint = {2610.23842},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23842},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Canonical Layer Inference for Deep Gaussian Processes via Symmetry-Breaking Augmentation
AU  - Yichen Zhu
AU  - Hengrui Luo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.23842
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23842
AB  - Deep Gaussian processes (DGPs) are flexible priors for compositional regression functions, but inference for intermediate layers faces questions. The basic obstruction is an adjacent-layer symmetry: applying an invertible transformation and its inverse to two adjacent layers leaves the composed regression map unchanged. Under explicit symmetry and prior-comparability conditions, we show that the posterior may not concentrate on any prescribed intermediate-layer representation, even when the composed regression function is estimable. We then introduce an augmented ρ-fractional posterior that reweights layer decompositions by a non-saturating identity-deviation penalty. The augmentation changes posterior odds between symmetry-related decompositions by an exponential penalty ratio. Under proper choices of the penalty and a prior mass condition, it preserves function-level fractional posterior contraction, while shrinking the redundant layers towards the identity mapping. Thus, the likelihood does not identify a unique ``true'' set of layers; the augmentation favors identity-biased parsimonious decompositions within an equivalence class of layers; uniqueness of a selected representative is not established.
ER  -