A novel mechanism of ubiquitin-charging a bivalent E2:RING E3 complex
- 1The Pennsylvania State University
Abstract
Protein ubiquitination results from a cascade of enzyme interactions that transfer ubiquitin from one covalent bond to another. First, an E1 is activated by attaching ubiquitin to itself through a thioester bond. Next, in E2 charging, activated E1 interacts with an E2 and transfers ubiquitin to a thioester bond on the E2. Finally, an E3 mediates the transfer of ubiquitin from a charged E2 to an isopeptide bond on a protein target. RING E3s, the largest E3 family in eukaryotes, function as scaffolds rather than enzymes and facilitate direct transfer of ubiquitin from a charged E2 to a protein target by simultaneously engaging both. All RING E3s engage an E2 at an interface that overlaps with the E1-binding site and several form stable, bivalent complexes with an E2 through additional binding surfaces. How E2 charging proceeds within these complexes remains unclear.Here, we utilize human Rad6(Rad18)2 as a model bivalent E2:RING E3 complex to delineate the interplay of protein{middle dot}protein interactions among the primary human E1 (Uba1), an E2 (Rad6), and a RING E3 (Rad18) during E2 charging. Collectively, the results reveal a novel mechanism that is not directed by ubiquitin thioester affinity switches. Rather, interactions of Rad18 with Rad6 slow the chemistry step and all preceding steps of the Uba1 catalytic cycle via competitive inhibition but accelerate release of charged Rad6 from Uba1, ultimately stimulating Rad6 charging overall. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first example of a RING E3 stimulating Uba1-dependent charging of an E2.
Related
- LRRC58 defines an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex sensitive to cysteine abundance
- Cryo-EM structure of the sub-50 kD PDZ-RhoGEF catalytic core-RhoA complex reveals an allosteric mechanism for GEF switch
- The m6A methyltransferase complex protein VIRMA engages hepatitis C virus RNA through a WTAP-independent mechanism
- Targeting the SMG9–Wnt/β-catenin axis: A novel mechanism by which ginsenoside Rh2 suppresses triple-negative breast cancer progression
- Lactate metabolism and protein lactylation in programmed cell death: From novel mechanism to therapeutic strategies in human diseases
BibTeX
@misc{perreault2026novel,
title = {{A novel mechanism of ubiquitin-charging a bivalent E2:RING E3 complex}},
author = {S. Perreault and A. Mistry and E. Antony and M. Hedglin},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.04.749512},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.04.749512v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - A novel mechanism of ubiquitin-charging a bivalent E2:RING E3 complex
AU - S. Perreault
AU - A. Mistry
AU - E. Antony
AU - M. Hedglin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/04
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.04.749512
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.04.749512v1
AB - Protein ubiquitination results from a cascade of enzyme interactions that transfer ubiquitin from one covalent bond to another. First, an E1 is activated by attaching ubiquitin to itself through a thioester bond. Next, in E2 charging, activated E1 interacts with an E2 and transfers ubiquitin to a thioester bond on the E2. Finally, an E3 mediates the transfer of ubiquitin from a charged E2 to an isopeptide bond on a protein target. RING E3s, the largest E3 family in eukaryotes, function as scaffolds rather than enzymes and facilitate direct transfer of ubiquitin from a charged E2 to a protein target by simultaneously engaging both. All RING E3s engage an E2 at an interface that overlaps with the E1-binding site and several form stable, bivalent complexes with an E2 through additional binding surfaces. How E2 charging proceeds within these complexes remains unclear.Here, we utilize human Rad6(Rad18)2 as a model bivalent E2:RING E3 complex to delineate the interplay of protein{middle dot}protein interactions among the primary human E1 (Uba1), an E2 (Rad6), and a RING E3 (Rad18) during E2 charging. Collectively, the results reveal a novel mechanism that is not directed by ubiquitin thioester affinity switches. Rather, interactions of Rad18 with Rad6 slow the chemistry step and all preceding steps of the Uba1 catalytic cycle via competitive inhibition but accelerate release of charged Rad6 from Uba1, ultimately stimulating Rad6 charging overall. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first example of a RING E3 stimulating Uba1-dependent charging of an E2.
ER -