Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Advanced Science

Integrating Ecology and Economics in Agent‐Based Models to Support Agricultural Policy

6 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Biodiversity and People Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ Leipzig Germany
  2. 2Institute of Biodiversity Ecology, and Evolution Friedrich‐Schiller‐Universität Jena Jena Germany
  3. 3German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Leipzig Germany
  4. 4Agro‐Ecological Modeling Group Institute of Crop Sciences and Resource Conservation University of Bonn Bonn Germany
  5. 5Department of Geographical Sciences University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA
  6. 6Faculty for Agricultural and Environmental Sciences University of Rostock Rostock Germany

Abstract

Agriculture is a complex social‐ecological system with numerous interactions between policies, markets, farm management, landscapes, and ecosystems. Agent‐based models are a valuable method for studying these agricultural systems, as they are able to simulate the spatiotemporal dynamics and heterogeneous actors inherent to them. This potentially also makes such models helpful tools for scientific policy advice. Here, we conduct a literature review to evaluate how agent‐based models represent social‐ecological systems in agriculture. We analyze 56 published models using a set of 26 criteria to determine whether socio‐economic and ecological aspects of agriculture have been studied. We find that there is a particularly robust tradition of using agent‐based models for economic impact analyses of policy changes, and much effort has gone into studying decision‐making by land users. However, ecological models of biodiversity and ecosystem services are still often very abstract and ignore important land‐use processes, impeding their usefulness for providing policy advice. Research areas that are currently underdeveloped include simulating farm management and landscape dynamics in ecological models, risk management in economic models, and bidirectional human‐nature interactions in social‐ecological models. Agent‐based modeling of agriculture would also profit from using model coupling to represent more of the breadth of social‐ecological systems.

Related

  1. Is greening enough? Short-term limited effects of 2015-2022 European Common Agricultural Policy reform on bird diversity in northern Italy
    Andrea Dalpasso, Danilo Bertoni, Giacomo Aletti +10
    Journal of Environmental ManagementPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text1 citedEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Water quality for agricultural reuse: integrating risk assessment, governance, and sustainable implementation for resilient food systems
    Mohamed A. E. AbdelRahman, Amal M. El-Feky
    Frontiers in Sustainable Food SystemsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  3. Scaling up the global Green Bond market: Integrating global policy frameworks with stakeholder perceptions from Australia and the United Kingdom
    Madurika Nanayakkara, Sisira Colombage
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textClimate sciencePLOS
  4. Integrating green building technology and renewable energy for a carbon-neutral built environment: Exploring the mechanisms of energy efficiency, AI technology, and environmental policy stringency
    Emmanuel Baffour Gyau, Daniel Adu, Samuel Gyamfi
    Innovation and Green DevelopmentPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  5. Dynamic life cycle assessment in environmental assessment of processes and products: A scoping review of sectoral applications, digitalization, decision support, and policy relevance
    Ana Arias, Gumersindo Feijoo, Marı́a Teresa Moreira
    Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND6 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{vedder2026integrating,
  title = {{Integrating Ecology and Economics in Agent‐Based Models to Support Agricultural Policy}},
  author = {Daniel Vedder and Judith Josephin Rakowski and Lea‐Deborah Kolb and Greta Sophie Theilen‐Loges and Sebastian Lakner and Guy Pe'er},
  journal = {Advanced Science},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/advs.202520081},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202520081},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Integrating Ecology and Economics in Agent‐Based Models to Support Agricultural Policy
AU  - Daniel Vedder
AU  - Judith Josephin Rakowski
AU  - Lea‐Deborah Kolb
AU  - Greta Sophie Theilen‐Loges
AU  - Sebastian Lakner
AU  - Guy Pe'er
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Advanced Science
DO  - 10.1002/advs.202520081
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202520081
AB  - Agriculture is a complex social‐ecological system with numerous interactions between policies, markets, farm management, landscapes, and ecosystems. Agent‐based models are a valuable method for studying these agricultural systems, as they are able to simulate the spatiotemporal dynamics and heterogeneous actors inherent to them. This potentially also makes such models helpful tools for scientific policy advice. Here, we conduct a literature review to evaluate how agent‐based models represent social‐ecological systems in agriculture. We analyze 56 published models using a set of 26 criteria to determine whether socio‐economic and ecological aspects of agriculture have been studied. We find that there is a particularly robust tradition of using agent‐based models for economic impact analyses of policy changes, and much effort has gone into studying decision‐making by land users. However, ecological models of biodiversity and ecosystem services are still often very abstract and ignore important land‐use processes, impeding their usefulness for providing policy advice. Research areas that are currently underdeveloped include simulating farm management and landscape dynamics in ecological models, risk management in economic models, and bidirectional human‐nature interactions in social‐ecological models. Agent‐based modeling of agriculture would also profit from using model coupling to represent more of the breadth of social‐ecological systems.
SN  - 2198-3844
ER  -