Predictive and feedback signals differently shape the formation of language representations
Abstract
Adults vary greatly in how effectively they learn a new language, but the signals driving the learning processes and individual differences remain unclear. Over seven days, we tracked behavioral learning and collected fMRI data on day 1 from 102 adults as they learned an artificial language with corrective feedback. We trained matched transformer models to predict upcoming linguistic elements, learn grammaticality from corrective supervision or reinforcement-like reward signals in the feedback, and compared their internal representations with human brain activity. Representations derived from the prediction-focused model accounted for the largest share of unique neural variance at the group level, despite the human task being feedback-based. Across model-training stages, alignment between the predictive model and neural representations shifted from sensory to higher-order language and associative networks, indicating a model abstraction process. Conversely, neural patterns related to the feedback model were most useful for predicting individuals' future generalization outcomes on Day 7. Reward signals did not significantly account for learning variance of either type. These findings support a multi-signal model of adult language learning, in which prediction shapes a common neural learning architecture across learners, whereas feedback-related mechanisms better explain individual differences over time.
Related
- Predictive adequacy and measurement dependence of metabolic representations in controlled synthetic systems
- Predictive consequences of alternative representations of metabolic measurements: A controlled synthetic study of categories, longitudinal information and transition preservation
- A self-limiting mechanotransduction feedback loop ensures robust organ formation
- Plasticity degeneracy underlies flexible formation and reconfiguration of spatial representations in hippocampal granule cells
- Predictive coding of visual feedback of actions in human parieto-frontal circuits
BibTeX
@misc{yang2026predictive,
title = {{Predictive and feedback signals differently shape the formation of language representations}},
author = {Shuguang Yang and Shaoyun Yu and Xin Jiang and Suiping Wang and Gangyi Feng},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.09409},
eprint = {2605.09409},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09409},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Predictive and feedback signals differently shape the formation of language representations
AU - Shuguang Yang
AU - Shaoyun Yu
AU - Xin Jiang
AU - Suiping Wang
AU - Gangyi Feng
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.09409
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09409
AB - Adults vary greatly in how effectively they learn a new language, but the signals driving the learning processes and individual differences remain unclear. Over seven days, we tracked behavioral learning and collected fMRI data on day 1 from 102 adults as they learned an artificial language with corrective feedback. We trained matched transformer models to predict upcoming linguistic elements, learn grammaticality from corrective supervision or reinforcement-like reward signals in the feedback, and compared their internal representations with human brain activity. Representations derived from the prediction-focused model accounted for the largest share of unique neural variance at the group level, despite the human task being feedback-based. Across model-training stages, alignment between the predictive model and neural representations shifted from sensory to higher-order language and associative networks, indicating a model abstraction process. Conversely, neural patterns related to the feedback model were most useful for predicting individuals' future generalization outcomes on Day 7. Reward signals did not significantly account for learning variance of either type. These findings support a multi-signal model of adult language learning, in which prediction shapes a common neural learning architecture across learners, whereas feedback-related mechanisms better explain individual differences over time.
ER -