Effects of Trotter Error, Digitization Error, and Initial State Overlap on Tapered Quantum Phase Estimation for Minimum Eigenvalue Computation
Abstract
We numerically implement full quantum circuits of optimal tapered Quantum Phase Estimation (in the form of an implementable approximate bandwidth-limited DPSS taper) for the purpose of minimum eigenvalue computation, where the Hamiltonian time-evolution unitary is implemented using standard Trotterization, and the taper state is constructed using an optimized bandwidth-limited taper. We illustrate, on representative quantum Hamiltonians, with tractable exact classical numerical quantum circuit simulations, how tapered QPE performs with respect to optimal phase sampling rate, absolute error, Shannon entropy of the optimal phase distribution, when the tQPE algorithm parameters are changed. Those algorithm parameters are Trotter error, finite sampling, imperfect initial states, total evolution time, and digitization error (number of phase qubits). The reported numerical experiments include up to ℓ=10 phase qubits of precision with m=3 additional phase-register error suppression qubits, on a $4$-qubit Heisenberg quantum magnet model Hamiltonian, using up to 12th-order Trotterization. We numerically show i) the steady-state optimal phase sampling rate is determined by the initial state overlap with the ground-state, ii) with respect to phase sampling probability, or overall eigenvalue sampling error rate, there is no strong evolution time dependence for tQPE unless there is high Trotter error, iii) the approximated time-evolution unitaries in tQPE, like in standard QPE, can result in substantial ringing, which leads to non-physical eigenvalue estimates.
Related
- What Moved the Alarm Score? Causal Attribution with Exact Computation and Scarce-Incident Estimation
- Electromagnetic Localization 6-DoF Pose Estimation with TGNet-Guided Initial Value Refinement
- Causal effect estimation for ordinal outcomes: a performance comparison of G-computation, IPW, and TMLE-based methods.
- A holomorphic Lie-Trotter product formula for nonlinear local semigroup
- The Szemerédi-Trotter Estimate in Finite Field with its Applications
BibTeX
@misc{pelofske2026effects,
title = {{Effects of Trotter Error, Digitization Error, and Initial State Overlap on Tapered Quantum Phase Estimation for Minimum Eigenvalue Computation}},
author = {Elijah Pelofske and Stephan Eidenbenz},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.06249},
eprint = {2609.06249},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06249},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Effects of Trotter Error, Digitization Error, and Initial State Overlap on Tapered Quantum Phase Estimation for Minimum Eigenvalue Computation
AU - Elijah Pelofske
AU - Stephan Eidenbenz
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/05
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.06249
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06249
AB - We numerically implement full quantum circuits of optimal tapered Quantum Phase Estimation (in the form of an implementable approximate bandwidth-limited DPSS taper) for the purpose of minimum eigenvalue computation, where the Hamiltonian time-evolution unitary is implemented using standard Trotterization, and the taper state is constructed using an optimized bandwidth-limited taper. We illustrate, on representative quantum Hamiltonians, with tractable exact classical numerical quantum circuit simulations, how tapered QPE performs with respect to optimal phase sampling rate, absolute error, Shannon entropy of the optimal phase distribution, when the tQPE algorithm parameters are changed. Those algorithm parameters are Trotter error, finite sampling, imperfect initial states, total evolution time, and digitization error (number of phase qubits). The reported numerical experiments include up to ℓ=10 phase qubits of precision with m=3 additional phase-register error suppression qubits, on a $4$-qubit Heisenberg quantum magnet model Hamiltonian, using up to 12th-order Trotterization. We numerically show i) the steady-state optimal phase sampling rate is determined by the initial state overlap with the ground-state, ii) with respect to phase sampling probability, or overall eigenvalue sampling error rate, there is no strong evolution time dependence for tQPE unless there is high Trotter error, iii) the approximated time-evolution unitaries in tQPE, like in standard QPE, can result in substantial ringing, which leads to non-physical eigenvalue estimates.
ER -