Early mental health inequalities among preschool children in Portugal: a cross-sectional study of social, family and health behaviour correlates
Abstract
Background: Mental health difficulties in early childhood may affect development and contribute to later inequalities, yet community-based evidence remains limited in Portugal. This study estimated the proportion of preschool children with mental health difficulties and examined associations with immigrant background, socioeconomic and family circumstances, perinatal factors and health behaviours. We also compared children with and without an immigrant background.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from children recruited through primary health care centres in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area between May 2022 and December 2024. Of 760 participants, 453 children aged ≥ 4 years with a valid parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties score were included. Caregivers reported sociodemographic, family and perinatal characteristics and health behaviours. Early mental health difficulties were defined as borderline/abnormal Total Difficulties scores (≥ 14). Immigrant background was defined by the child or at least one parent being born outside the European Union. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations in 417 children with complete data; an additional negative binomial model analysed the undichotomised SDQ Total Difficulties score.
Results: Among the 453 children, 23.6% scored in the borderline/abnormal range. Higher adjusted odds were observed for household incomes of >€750–€1,500 versus >€1,500 per month (aOR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.13–3.90), extended or other family arrangements versus nuclear households (aOR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.02–3.26), and no sports participation (aOR = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.59–4.94). Children with an immigrant background showed greater socioeconomic disadvantage, higher screen exposure, lower sports participation and more often scored in the abnormal range for peer relationship problems (12.5% vs. 5.7%). The association with immigrant background was attenuated after adjustment, with no clear independent association remaining (aOR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.66–1.79). The full-score analysis supported the association with no sports participation; estimates for income and family structure were less conclusive.
Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of considering children’s economic and family circumstances and daily routines in early identification and intervention. Primary care and community services may help families access appropriate support. Longitudinal and intervention studies are needed to clarify these relationships and assess potential preventive effects.
Related
- Home environmental factors associated with screen time among Japanese preschool children: a cross-sectional secondary analysis using exploratory structural equation modeling
- Explainable machine learning for identifying insufficient sleep duration among preschool children in cold-region China: a cross-sectional study
- Family socioeconomic status and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in preschool children: a cross-sectional study of 21,366 parent–child dyads in Yan’an, western China
- Dental caries experience and uncooperative behavior during school-based oral examination among preschool children in Ha’il City, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study
- Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Movement Behaviour Questionnaire-Child (MBQ-C) for assessing active play, screen time, and sleep in preschool children
BibTeX
@article{goncalves2026early,
title = {{Early mental health inequalities among preschool children in Portugal: a cross-sectional study of social, family and health behaviour correlates}},
author = {Rita Gonçalves and Sónia Dias and Maria Rosário O. Martins},
journal = {BMC Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1186/s12889-026-29767-y},
url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12889-026-29767-y},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Early mental health inequalities among preschool children in Portugal: a cross-sectional study of social, family and health behaviour correlates
AU - Rita Gonçalves
AU - Sónia Dias
AU - Maria Rosário O. Martins
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/10
JO - BMC Public Health
DO - 10.1186/s12889-026-29767-y
UR - https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12889-026-29767-y
AB - Background: Mental health difficulties in early childhood may affect development and contribute to later inequalities, yet community-based evidence remains limited in Portugal. This study estimated the proportion of preschool children with mental health difficulties and examined associations with immigrant background, socioeconomic and family circumstances, perinatal factors and health behaviours. We also compared children with and without an immigrant background. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from children recruited through primary health care centres in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area between May 2022 and December 2024. Of 760 participants, 453 children aged ≥ 4 years with a valid parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties score were included. Caregivers reported sociodemographic, family and perinatal characteristics and health behaviours. Early mental health difficulties were defined as borderline/abnormal Total Difficulties scores (≥ 14). Immigrant background was defined by the child or at least one parent being born outside the European Union. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations in 417 children with complete data; an additional negative binomial model analysed the undichotomised SDQ Total Difficulties score. Results: Among the 453 children, 23.6% scored in the borderline/abnormal range. Higher adjusted odds were observed for household incomes of >€750–€1,500 versus >€1,500 per month (aOR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.13–3.90), extended or other family arrangements versus nuclear households (aOR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.02–3.26), and no sports participation (aOR = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.59–4.94). Children with an immigrant background showed greater socioeconomic disadvantage, higher screen exposure, lower sports participation and more often scored in the abnormal range for peer relationship problems (12.5% vs. 5.7%). The association with immigrant background was attenuated after adjustment, with no clear independent association remaining (aOR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.66–1.79). The full-score analysis supported the association with no sports participation; estimates for income and family structure were less conclusive. Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of considering children’s economic and family circumstances and daily routines in early identification and intervention. Primary care and community services may help families access appropriate support. Longitudinal and intervention studies are needed to clarify these relationships and assess potential preventive effects.
SN - 1471-2458
ER -