Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Cost Comparisons for Random and Deterministic Scans in Component-Wise Markov Chains

Abstract

Gibbs samplers, and more generally component-wise Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms such as Metropolis-within-Gibbs, can be implemented using either random-scan or deterministic-scan updates. How much convergence can depend on this choice of scanning rule has been a longstanding question. We study this problem through L2 spectral gaps, measuring computational cost in units of component updates. For a d-block Gibbs sampler, the cost of random scan is at most twice that of any fixed deterministic scan, while the reverse cost ratio is at most of order d2. We extend these comparisons to general reversible component-wise updates under the global block-wise contraction condition. If Kj denotes the update of block j and Pj its Gibbs counterpart, and |Kj−Pj|≤ λ0<1 for j=1,…,d, then the cost of random scan is at most 2/(1−λ0) times that of deterministic scan, while the reverse cost ratio is of order at most d2/(1−λ0). Examples show that the cost bounds for random scan relative to deterministic scan are asymptotically sharp and that the joint dependence on d and (1−λ0)−1 in the reverse comparison cannot be improved uniformly. This work was assisted by generative AI, including for formal verification of mathematical results in Lean. The human author reviewed and verified the mathematical content and takes full responsibility for the results.

Related

  1. Markov chains arising in the study of random matrices over pro-finite rings
    Nikita Lvov
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryProbabilityarXiv
  2. Bernstein’s inequalities for general Markov chains
    Bai Jiang, Qiang Sun, Jianqing Fan A B
    Annales de l Institut Henri Poincaré Probabilités et StatistiquesPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text21 citedStatisticsOpenAlex
  3. Global central limit theorems for Markov chains
    Christophe Cuny, Michael Lin
    Stochastic Processes and their ApplicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedMathematical physicsHAL
  4. Global Central Limit Theorems for Markov chains with normal transition operator
    Christophe Cuny, Michael Lin
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textProbabilityHALarXiv
  5. Wasserstein de-initialization for Markov chains
    Mareike Hasenpflug
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textProbabilityStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{kwon2026cost,
  title = {{Cost Comparisons for Random and Deterministic Scans in Component-Wise Markov Chains}},
  author = {Youngwoo Kwon},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.01121},
  eprint = {2610.01121},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01121},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Cost Comparisons for Random and Deterministic Scans in Component-Wise Markov Chains
AU  - Youngwoo Kwon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.01121
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01121
AB  - Gibbs samplers, and more generally component-wise Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms such as Metropolis-within-Gibbs, can be implemented using either random-scan or deterministic-scan updates. How much convergence can depend on this choice of scanning rule has been a longstanding question. We study this problem through L^2 spectral gaps, measuring computational cost in units of component updates. For a d-block Gibbs sampler, the cost of random scan is at most twice that of any fixed deterministic scan, while the reverse cost ratio is at most of order d^2. We extend these comparisons to general reversible component-wise updates under the global block-wise contraction condition. If K_j denotes the update of block j and P_j its Gibbs counterpart, and |K_j−P_j|≤ λ_0<1 for j=1,…,d, then the cost of random scan is at most 2/(1−λ_0) times that of deterministic scan, while the reverse cost ratio is of order at most d^2/(1−λ_0). Examples show that the cost bounds for random scan relative to deterministic scan are asymptotically sharp and that the joint dependence on d and (1−λ_0)^−1 in the reverse comparison cannot be improved uniformly. This work was assisted by generative AI, including for formal verification of mathematical results in Lean. The human author reviewed and verified the mathematical content and takes full responsibility for the results.
ER  -