Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Differences in interactions between brain regions across personality types while learning in zebrafish (Danio rerio)

  1. 1University of Nebraska Omaha

Abstract

Learning is an important process for survival. Many studies find that variation in learning ability is related to personality type. Bold individuals generally learn faster than shy, however, the underlying neural mechanisms are not well understood. Potential mechanisms for differences in learning speed are variation in neurotransmitter activity, specifically dopamine and serotonin, and functional connectivity across the brain. In this study we quantified the number of generally active, active dopaminergic, and active serotonergic neurons using immunohistochemistry across 12 brain regions at two timepoints in bold and shy zebrafish undergoing an associative learning task. There were no interactions between treatment and personality type in any of the cell count measures suggesting that individual region activity and neurotransmitter activity do not explain learning differences. However, analyses of general neural activity networks revealed that the connection from the posterior zone of the dorsal telencephalon (olfactory cortex homolog) to lateral zone of the dorsal telencephalon (hippocampus homolog) was positive in bold but negative in shy fish undergoing learning. Overall, the results suggest that differences in activity involving reward processing in the brain may explain differences in reward learning between personality types.

Related

  1. Personality Variation in Associative Learning and Memory Retention in Zebrafish (Danio rerio)
    P. B. Sunday-Jimmy, T. T. A. Le, R. Y. Wong
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
  2. Species-specific sensorimotor noise levels explain saccadic suppression strength differences between macaques and zebrafish
    Giulia Soto, Florian A. Dehmelt, Matthias P. Baumann +5
    iSciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecular biology & gene regulationNeuroscienceCell PressCrossref
  3. Zebrafish Reveals Genotype‐Specific Differences in Betanodavirus Infection and Host Responses
    Patricia Moreno, Daniel Álvarez-Torres, Manon Mehraz +7
    Transboundary and emerging diseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyHALPMC
  4. Social modulation of activity and orientation fosters complex interactions in young zebrafish
    L. Desban, K. Guillemin, J. S. Eisen +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull text1 citedZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
  5. zAcademy: an open-source programmable conditioning arena reveals sex- and genotype-dependent avoidance learning in adult zebrafish
    S. Huang, B. He, Y. Geng
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{corcoran2026differences,
  title = {{Differences in interactions between brain regions across personality types while learning in zebrafish (Danio rerio)}},
  author = {J. Corcoran and R. Y. Wong},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.09.750425},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.09.750425v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Differences in interactions between brain regions across personality types while learning in zebrafish (Danio rerio)
AU  - J. Corcoran
AU  - R. Y. Wong
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/09
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.09.750425
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.09.750425v1
AB  - Learning is an important process for survival. Many studies find that variation in learning ability is related to personality type. Bold individuals generally learn faster than shy, however, the underlying neural mechanisms are not well understood. Potential mechanisms for differences in learning speed are variation in neurotransmitter activity, specifically dopamine and serotonin, and functional connectivity across the brain. In this study we quantified the number of generally active, active dopaminergic, and active serotonergic neurons using immunohistochemistry across 12 brain regions at two timepoints in bold and shy zebrafish undergoing an associative learning task. There were no interactions between treatment and personality type in any of the cell count measures suggesting that individual region activity and neurotransmitter activity do not explain learning differences. However, analyses of general neural activity networks revealed that the connection from the posterior zone of the dorsal telencephalon (olfactory cortex homolog) to lateral zone of the dorsal telencephalon (hippocampus homolog) was positive in bold but negative in shy fish undergoing learning. Overall, the results suggest that differences in activity involving reward processing in the brain may explain differences in reward learning between personality types.
ER  -