Influence of Geometry and Tissue Damage on the Mechanical Behaviour of Skin Meshing
Abstract
Skin meshing increases graft coverage, yet the clinically achieved expansion often falls below the manufacturer's nominal meshing ratio. Previous elastic analyses have demonstrated that mesh topology and skin anisotropy strongly influence graft expansion; however, the effect of progressive damage at larger deformation remains unexplored. This study therefore investigates how progressive damage affects the expansion and mechanical response of skin meshes. The performance of auxetic mesh geometries is compared with conventional Zimmer mesher (ZM) geometry. Human back skin was modelled using a one-term Ogden ground matrix and a Gasser Ogden Holzapfel (GOH) collagen network, with separate scalar Kachanov-type continuum damage variables for each constituent. The auxetic geometries, including 1st- and 2nd-order alternative slits (AS1 and AS2), I-shaped (IS) and H-shaped (HS) re-entrant patterns, and ZM, were analysed with Langer's lines oriented either parallel or perpendicular to the loading direction. Hyperelastic and damage-based formulations were compared up to 25% strain, and the damage-based simulations were subsequently extended to 40% strain. ZM was further loaded to 155% strain; the area ratios attained by HS at 40% strain were matched by ZM at 142.1% and 124.7% strain for Langer's lines parallel and perpendicular to loading, respectively. Results indicate that HS achieves greater coverage than ZM for a given stretch, whereas its damage advantage depends on the orientation of Langer's lines.
Related
- Numerical predictions for the behaviour of brick masonry with unsaturated polyester mortar: influence of the damage
- Mechanical behaviour of hydrogenated nanoporous palladium
- First results on hydration time effect on Wharton's jelly mechanical behaviour from micro to macro scale
- Infectious behaviour: Simulating the effects of communication and social influence on pathogen transmission in crowds
- On the influence of mechanical loadings on the porosities of structural epoxy adhesives joints by means of in-situ X-ray microtomography
BibTeX
@misc{ghaleh2026influence,
title = {{Influence of Geometry and Tissue Damage on the Mechanical Behaviour of Skin Meshing}},
author = {Masoumeh Razaghi Pey Ghaleh and Denis O'Mahoney and Kevin Moerman},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.04875},
eprint = {2611.04875},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04875},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Influence of Geometry and Tissue Damage on the Mechanical Behaviour of Skin Meshing
AU - Masoumeh Razaghi Pey Ghaleh
AU - Denis O'Mahoney
AU - Kevin Moerman
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.04875
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04875
AB - Skin meshing increases graft coverage, yet the clinically achieved expansion often falls below the manufacturer's nominal meshing ratio. Previous elastic analyses have demonstrated that mesh topology and skin anisotropy strongly influence graft expansion; however, the effect of progressive damage at larger deformation remains unexplored. This study therefore investigates how progressive damage affects the expansion and mechanical response of skin meshes. The performance of auxetic mesh geometries is compared with conventional Zimmer mesher (ZM) geometry. Human back skin was modelled using a one-term Ogden ground matrix and a Gasser Ogden Holzapfel (GOH) collagen network, with separate scalar Kachanov-type continuum damage variables for each constituent. The auxetic geometries, including 1st- and 2nd-order alternative slits (AS1 and AS2), I-shaped (IS) and H-shaped (HS) re-entrant patterns, and ZM, were analysed with Langer's lines oriented either parallel or perpendicular to the loading direction. Hyperelastic and damage-based formulations were compared up to 25% strain, and the damage-based simulations were subsequently extended to 40% strain. ZM was further loaded to 155% strain; the area ratios attained by HS at 40% strain were matched by ZM at 142.1% and 124.7% strain for Langer's lines parallel and perpendicular to loading, respectively. Results indicate that HS achieves greater coverage than ZM for a given stretch, whereas its damage advantage depends on the orientation of Langer's lines.
ER -