Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 47 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMC Health Services Research

Associations of psychological safety and perceptions of organizational environment among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study in a university hospital

  1. 1The Second Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, 930-0194 Japan

Abstract

Background: Psychological safety is increasingly recognized as an important organizational factor in healthcare, yet its relationship with staff satisfaction at the institutional level remains unclear. This study examined the association between psychological safety and staff satisfaction using perceptions of their organizational environment framework.

Methods: We conducted a single-center cross-sectional survey of healthcare workers at a university hospital in November 2023. Staff satisfaction and psychological safety were assessed using a web-based anonymous questionnaire. The overall evaluation score was used as a global indicator of perceptions of their organizational environment. Importance–satisfaction analysis identified priority domains, and multivariable linear regression evaluated associations between psychological safety and outcomes.

Results: Among 685 participants, retention intention and perceived quality of care were identified as priority improvement domains. All psychological safety items correlated positively with overall evaluation (p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, “skills and talents valued and utilized” (β = 0.381, p < 0.001) and “able to bring up problems” (β = 0.188, p < 0.001) showed the strongest associations with organizational evaluation. Similar relationships were observed for priority domains. Employees in their 30s demonstrated lower scores than older groups.

Conclusions: Psychological safety, particularly the speak-up climate and recognition of professional expertise, was strongly associated with healthcare workers’ overall perceptions of their organizational environment.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15330-3.

Related

  1. Healthcare professionals' perceptions of managing psychological needs in palliative and end-of-life care: an All-Ireland mixed-methods survey.
    Niall Galligan, Barry Quinn, Rory Cousins +7
    BMC palliative carePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  2. Organizational patient safety culture and workforce well-being among healthcare workers: associations with resilience and work-life balance in a hospital-wide cross-sectional study.
    Mei-Fei Hsieh, Po-Ming Ku, Chin-Ming Chen
    BMC health services researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. Adolescent Perceptions of Organizational Trauma Resilience in an HIV Clinic: A Convergent Parallel Mixed Methods Design Study
    Leslie Lauren Brown, Jamie Linn Stewart, Almariana Jessica Acuña +5
    Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CarePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textInfectious diseasePMC
  4. Career-Choice Regret Among Medical Students in the United Kingdom: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study of Occupational and Organizational Perceptions.
    Alexia Davy
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. The relationship between role stress, psychological empowerment and organizational silence of psychiatric nurses: a variable-centered and individual-centered analysis
    Yangguang Li, Shumin Gao, Lina Xie
    Frontiers in psychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@article{koike2026associations,
  title = {{Associations of psychological safety and perceptions of organizational environment among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study in a university hospital}},
  author = {Tsutomu Koike and Teruhiko Imamura and Kota Kakeshita and Koichiro Kinugawa},
  journal = {BMC Health Services Research},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12913-026-15330-3},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15330-3},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Associations of psychological safety and perceptions of organizational environment among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study in a university hospital
AU  - Tsutomu Koike
AU  - Teruhiko Imamura
AU  - Kota Kakeshita
AU  - Koichiro Kinugawa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/07
JO  - BMC Health Services Research
DO  - 10.1186/s12913-026-15330-3
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15330-3
AB  - Background: Psychological safety is increasingly recognized as an important organizational factor in healthcare, yet its relationship with staff satisfaction at the institutional level remains unclear. This study examined the association between psychological safety and staff satisfaction using perceptions of their organizational environment framework.  Methods: We conducted a single-center cross-sectional survey of healthcare workers at a university hospital in November 2023. Staff satisfaction and psychological safety were assessed using a web-based anonymous questionnaire. The overall evaluation score was used as a global indicator of perceptions of their organizational environment. Importance–satisfaction analysis identified priority domains, and multivariable linear regression evaluated associations between psychological safety and outcomes.  Results: Among 685 participants, retention intention and perceived quality of care were identified as priority improvement domains. All psychological safety items correlated positively with overall evaluation (p < 0.05). In multivariable analyses, “skills and talents valued and utilized” (β = 0.381, p < 0.001) and “able to bring up problems” (β = 0.188, p < 0.001) showed the strongest associations with organizational evaluation. Similar relationships were observed for priority domains. Employees in their 30s demonstrated lower scores than older groups.  Conclusions: Psychological safety, particularly the speak-up climate and recognition of professional expertise, was strongly associated with healthcare workers’ overall perceptions of their organizational environment.  Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15330-3.
SN  - 1472-6963
ER  -