Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

The influence of lakes and reservoirs on estimated flood peaks at hourly vs. daily timescale in the Alps

  1. 1ETH Zurich (Zurich, Switzerland)
  2. 2Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (Birmensdorf, Switzerland)

Abstract

Water bodies such as lakes and reservoirs can play a crucial role in reducing estimated flood peaks, at both daily and hourly time resolution. While the effect of water bodies on flood peaks has been demonstrated in the past at different time resolutions, it remains unclear how water bodies affect the ratio between estimated daily and hourly quantiles, that is, to which degree their attenuation effect is scale dependent. Here, we analyse how water bodies influence this ratio using two approaches: (1) by comparing estimated daily and hourly flood peak quantiles upstream and downstream of reservoirs of four local case studies, and (2) by comparing daily and hourly flood peak quantiles across a large sample of catchments in Switzerland with various degrees of water-body influence. Our results show that reservoirs dampen hourly peak discharge much more strongly than daily peak discharge, which leads to similar daily and hourly flood peaks downstream of reservoirs. Specifically, our case study analysis highlights that (sub-)hourly peak discharge is attenuated by up to 70 % downstream of reservoirs during flood events with a 10-year return period. We also find that the attenuation effect is particularly pronounced in catchments that are heavily influenced by water bodies, i.e. those catchments where more than 60 % of the area contributes to water body inflow. This implies that daily flood peaks are a good proxy for hourly peaks in strongly regulated catchments in contrast to natural ones. We conclude that considering water body influence on flood peaks is crucial to understand the similarity between daily and hourly flood peaks downstream of water bodies. This suggests that water body influence should also be considered in large-sample studies for which the exact influence may be unknown, and quantified using suitable metrics such as the fraction of the total catchment above the water body.

Versions

Related

  1. Comparison of machine learning and spatial interpolation methods for hourly rainfall data imputation in the Oliwski Stream catchment
    Ghunwa Shah, Wojciech Artichowicz, Tomasz Kolerski
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyCrossref
  2. A stochastic model of continuous hourly areal rainfall series applied to a wide range of French catchments
    Patrick Arnaud, Philippe Cantet
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk AssessmentPeer-reviewedLicence Ouverte 2.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHydrology & soilsHAL
  3. Simple Box-Cox probabilistic models for hourly streamflow predictions
    Cristina Prieto, Dmitri Kavetski, Fabrizio Fenicia +4
    Hydrology and Earth System SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Hydrology & soilsCopernicus
  4. AeroTrans: Hourly AOD retrieval over land from MSG-1/SEVIRI imagery integrating Transformer and transfer learning
    Yulong Fan, Zhanqing Li, Lin Sun +5
    Remote Sensing of EnvironmentPeer-reviewedLicence not stated7 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  5. A novel hourly PM2.5 concentration prediction model using IMSTL-FVMD-HLDT hybrid architecture with Adam optimized by Schrödinger search strategy
    Xiaoliang Zhao, Pinyuan Qiao, Hanliang Li +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionCrossref
BibTeX
@article{gotte2026influence,
  title = {{The influence of lakes and reservoirs on estimated flood peaks at hourly vs. daily timescale in the Alps}},
  author = {Jonas Götte and Paul C. Astagneau and Manuela I. Brunner},
  journal = {Hydrology and Earth System Sciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5194/hess-30-6235-2026},
  url = {https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6235/2026/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The influence of lakes and reservoirs on estimated flood peaks at hourly vs. daily timescale in the Alps
AU  - Jonas Götte
AU  - Paul C. Astagneau
AU  - Manuela I. Brunner
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/09
JO  - Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
DO  - 10.5194/hess-30-6235-2026
UR  - https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/30/6235/2026/
AB  - Water bodies such as lakes and reservoirs can play a crucial role in reducing estimated flood peaks, at both daily and hourly time resolution. While the effect of water bodies on flood peaks has been demonstrated in the past at different time resolutions, it remains unclear how water bodies affect the ratio between estimated daily and hourly quantiles, that is, to which degree their attenuation effect is scale dependent. Here, we analyse how water bodies influence this ratio using two approaches: (1) by comparing estimated daily and hourly flood peak quantiles upstream and downstream of reservoirs of four local case studies, and (2) by comparing daily and hourly flood peak quantiles across a large sample of catchments in Switzerland with various degrees of water-body influence. Our results show that reservoirs dampen hourly peak discharge much more strongly than daily peak discharge, which leads to similar daily and hourly flood peaks downstream of reservoirs. Specifically, our case study analysis highlights that (sub-)hourly peak discharge is attenuated by up to 70 % downstream of reservoirs during flood events with a 10-year return period. We also find that the attenuation effect is particularly pronounced in catchments that are heavily influenced by water bodies, i.e. those catchments where more than 60 % of the area contributes to water body inflow. This implies that daily flood peaks are a good proxy for hourly peaks in strongly regulated catchments in contrast to natural ones. We conclude that considering water body influence on flood peaks is crucial to understand the similarity between daily and hourly flood peaks downstream of water bodies. This suggests that water body influence should also be considered in large-sample studies for which the exact influence may be unknown, and quantified using suitable metrics such as the fraction of the total catchment above the water body.
SN  - 1607-7938
ER  -