Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease

Blood eosinophils in COPD: are biologics for everyone?

Abstract

Background:: Type 2 (T2) biologics represent a promising treatment option for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with eosinophilic inflammation.

Objectives:: To evaluate the prevalence of stable COPD patients who may be eligible for T2 biologics.

Design:: Real-world, retrospective, monocentric study in COPD patients undergoing inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.

Methods:: Clinical, functional, and inflammatory data were collected. Patients were considered eligible for T2 biologic therapy whether they were receiving optimized inhaled therapy and had a history of ⩾2 moderate and/or ⩾1 severe exacerbations in the previous year, together with a blood eosinophil count ⩾300 cells/μL.

Results:: Among 441 patients, 21.5% had blood eosinophil counts ⩾300 cells/μL and 6.8% fulfilled the combined eligibility criteria. A high burden of respiratory and cardiometabolic comorbidities and increased cardiovascular risk was observed in the overall population.

Conclusion:: Only a subgroup of patients seems eligible for biologics, treatment escalation should be based on optimized standard care management and patient phenotyping

Related

  1. Nationwide study of blood eosinophils in COPD: impact of exacerbations and corticosteroids
    Morten Borg, Ole Hilberg, Rikke Ibsen +1
    BMJ Open Respiratory ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicinePMC
  2. Blood eosinophil count and intensive care unit admission in patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of COPD: a retrospective cohort study.
    Umran Ozden Sertcelik, Ahmet Sertcelik
    BMC pulmonary medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. The Improving Access to Genetic Information for Everyone (IMAGINE) study: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a mainstreaming model of hereditary cancer multigene panel testing among patients of varying backgrounds
    Jada G Hamilton, Stephanie N Christian-Afflu, Anna Strang +20
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedLicence not statedGeneral medicineCrossref
  4. Cadherin-related family member 3 upregulates the effector functions of eosinophils
    K. Nakagome, T. Shimizu, Y. A. Bochkov +6
    AllergyPeer-reviewedLicence not stated5 citedPhysiologyHAL
  5. Is easy-to-read easy for everyone? An eye-tracking study across the adult lifespan.
    Sergio Navas-León, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
    Frontiers in aging neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{vanetti2026blood,
  title = {{Blood eosinophils in COPD: are biologics for everyone?}},
  author = {Marco Vanetti and Dina Visca and Francesco Ardesi and Antonia M. Taglioretti and Martina Zappa and Patrizia Pignatti and Antonio Spanevello},
  journal = {Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1177/17534666261471839},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666261471839},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Blood eosinophils in COPD: are biologics for everyone?
AU  - Marco Vanetti
AU  - Dina Visca
AU  - Francesco Ardesi
AU  - Antonia M. Taglioretti
AU  - Martina Zappa
AU  - Patrizia Pignatti
AU  - Antonio Spanevello
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/19
JO  - Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease
DO  - 10.1177/17534666261471839
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666261471839
AB  - Background:: Type 2 (T2) biologics represent a promising treatment option for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with eosinophilic inflammation.  Objectives:: To evaluate the prevalence of stable COPD patients who may be eligible for T2 biologics.  Design:: Real-world, retrospective, monocentric study in COPD patients undergoing inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.  Methods:: Clinical, functional, and inflammatory data were collected. Patients were considered eligible for T2 biologic therapy whether they were receiving optimized inhaled therapy and had a history of ⩾2 moderate and/or ⩾1 severe exacerbations in the previous year, together with a blood eosinophil count ⩾300 cells/μL.  Results:: Among 441 patients, 21.5% had blood eosinophil counts ⩾300 cells/μL and 6.8% fulfilled the combined eligibility criteria. A high burden of respiratory and cardiometabolic comorbidities and increased cardiovascular risk was observed in the overall population.  Conclusion:: Only a subgroup of patients seems eligible for biologics, treatment escalation should be based on optimized standard care management and patient phenotyping
SN  - 1753-4658
SN  - 1753-4666
ER  -