Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Revisiting AdaGrad in Stochastic Convex Optimization: Last Iterates, High Probability, and Lower Bounds

Abstract

AdaGrad and AdaGrad-Norm are widely used adaptive methods, but their precise behavior in stochastic convex optimization remains less understood. We first show that AdaGrad-Norm and AdaGrad do not admit any universal \textbf{last-iterate} rate, even under sub-Gaussian noise and bounded iterates. We then prove that bounded variance alone is too weak: even with bounded iterates, it cannot yield \textbf{high-probability average-iterate} rates, and without bounded iterates it may not even guarantee convergence in expectation. Besides, we construct tight Ω(log T/√T) lower bounds for both AdaGrad-Norm and AdaGrad under sub-Gaussian noise, showing that log T in existing average-iterate upper bounds is unavoidable. Finally, we show that this log T loss disappears once bounded-iterate condition is imposed: under a general ABC condition, both methods achieve rates O(1/√T).

Related

  1. SCMO: Stochastic Control for Optimization over Probability Measures on Infinite-Dimensional Spaces
    Hang Cheung, Jinniao Qiu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. High-Probability Sampled-Data Stabilization of General Nonlinear Stochastic Systems
    Kele Sun, Yudong Wang, Shijie Zhou +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Addendum to "Optimal Steering of a Linear Stochastic System to a Final Probability Distribution, Part II"
    Yongxin Chen, Tryphon T. Georgiou, Michele Pavon
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. (Cheap) Stochastic Policy Gradient Converges with High Probability for Linear Quadratic Regulator
    Yan Li, Chengze Xie
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Foundations of Stochastic Lexical Calculus: Semantic Descent and Random Dynamics on Probability Simplices
    Matthew F Dixon
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{ou2026revisiting,
  title = {{Revisiting AdaGrad in Stochastic Convex Optimization: Last Iterates, High Probability, and Lower Bounds}},
  author = {Weiming Ou and Xiao Wang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.32729},
  eprint = {2609.32729},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32729},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Revisiting AdaGrad in Stochastic Convex Optimization: Last Iterates, High Probability, and Lower Bounds
AU  - Weiming Ou
AU  - Xiao Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/26
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.32729
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32729
AB  - AdaGrad and AdaGrad-Norm are widely used adaptive methods, but their precise behavior in stochastic convex optimization remains less understood. We first show that AdaGrad-Norm and AdaGrad do not admit any universal \textbf{last-iterate} rate, even under sub-Gaussian noise and bounded iterates. We then prove that bounded variance alone is too weak: even with bounded iterates, it cannot yield \textbf{high-probability average-iterate} rates, and without bounded iterates it may not even guarantee convergence in expectation. Besides, we construct tight Ω(log T/√T) lower bounds for both AdaGrad-Norm and AdaGrad under sub-Gaussian noise, showing that log T in existing average-iterate upper bounds is unavoidable. Finally, we show that this log T loss disappears once bounded-iterate condition is imposed: under a general ABC condition, both methods achieve rates O(1/√T).
ER  -