Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Geoscientific Model Development

Conservation of heat in the Coupled Arctic Prediction System (CAPS v1.1): comprehensive model evaluation based on the MOSAiC observations

  1. 1Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China)

Abstract

Atmosphere–sea ice–ocean interactions are vital for understanding past and future changes in the Arctic climate system. Consistent heat-flux exchange across model-component interfaces is essential for investigating these interactions with coupled models on longer timescales. Here, we present the improved version of the Coupled Arctic Prediction System (CAPS), in which heat-flux exchange between the atmosphere (WRF) and ocean–sea ice (ROMS–CICE) components is made consistent across coupling interfaces. A set of pan-Arctic simulations covering the period of Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) were conducted with the revised CAPS. The revised coupling substantially reduces interfacial heat-flux residuals and improves the simulation of Arctic sea-ice conditions relative to the original coupling, which produces enhanced winter ice growth and reduced summer ice retreat during the 14-month simulation. CAPS was further evaluated against comprehensive MOSAiC observations of the atmosphere, ocean, snow, and sea ice. The model reproduces the broad evolution of Arctic conditions along the MOSAiC drift, although biases remain, partly associated with errors in simulated synoptic systems and unresolved polar physical processes. The constrained-atmosphere experiment with spectral nudging shows improved agreement with observations in several quantitative metrics, particularly for atmospheric profiles and ocean temperature. However, sensitivity experiments indicate that these improvements depend on the vertical extent and strength of nudging and should not be attributed to the revised coupling or model physics alone. Remaining biases in atmospheric humidity, surface turbulent heat fluxes, snow accumulation, and ocean salinity highlight priorities for further development of atmospheric boundary-layer, cloud radiation, snow/sea ice, and coupled surface processes in CAPS and other Arctic prediction systems.

Versions

Related

  1. Active and passive satellite observations coupled with carbon–nitrogen synergy for urban fossil fuel CO 2 emissions monitoring
    Jinchun Yi, Yiyang Huang, Ge Han +7
    Atmospheric chemistry and physicsPeer-reviewedCC BY6 citedClimate scienceOpenAlex
  2. Evaluation of HNO3, SO2, and NH3 in the Surface Tiled Aerosol and Gaseous Exchange (STAGE) option in the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model version 5.3.2 against field-scale, in situ and satellite observations
    Jesse O. Bash, John T. Walker, Zhiyong Wu +10
    Geoscientific model developmentPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral earth scienceEurope PMC
  3. AIFS-DOP: End-to-End Medium-Range Weather Prediction from Observations Alone with Machine Learning
    Ewan Pinnington, Peter Lean, Mihai Alexe +8
    arXiv (Cornell University)PreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull text8 citedAtmospheric science & meteorologyOpenAlex
  4. Ocean-Aware Sea-ice Emulator for Future Hybrid Coupled Prediction Systems
    Charlotte Durand, Pierre Rampal, Laurent Brodeau
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOceanography & cryosphereHAL
  5. A cross-channel temporal correlation transformer for diurnal near-surface air temperature prediction from multivariate observations
    Qianji Ding, Xing Huo
    Discover EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{yang2026conservation,
  title = {{Conservation of heat in the Coupled Arctic Prediction System (CAPS v1.1): comprehensive model evaluation based on the MOSAiC observations}},
  author = {Chao-Yuan Yang and Fengguan Gu and Jiping Liu and Annette Rinke and Hu Yang and Xiaoxu Shi},
  journal = {Geoscientific Model Development},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.5194/gmd-19-10595-2026},
  url = {https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/10595/2026/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Conservation of heat in the Coupled Arctic Prediction System (CAPS v1.1): comprehensive model evaluation based on the MOSAiC observations
AU  - Chao-Yuan Yang
AU  - Fengguan Gu
AU  - Jiping Liu
AU  - Annette Rinke
AU  - Hu Yang
AU  - Xiaoxu Shi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/09
JO  - Geoscientific Model Development
DO  - 10.5194/gmd-19-10595-2026
UR  - https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/10595/2026/
AB  - Atmosphere–sea ice–ocean interactions are vital for understanding past and future changes in the Arctic climate system. Consistent heat-flux exchange across model-component interfaces is essential for investigating these interactions with coupled models on longer timescales. Here, we present the improved version of the Coupled Arctic Prediction System (CAPS), in which heat-flux exchange between the atmosphere (WRF) and ocean–sea ice (ROMS–CICE) components is made consistent across coupling interfaces. A set of pan-Arctic simulations covering the period of Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) were conducted with the revised CAPS. The revised coupling substantially reduces interfacial heat-flux residuals and improves the simulation of Arctic sea-ice conditions relative to the original coupling, which produces enhanced winter ice growth and reduced summer ice retreat during the 14-month simulation. CAPS was further evaluated against comprehensive MOSAiC observations of the atmosphere, ocean, snow, and sea ice. The model reproduces the broad evolution of Arctic conditions along the MOSAiC drift, although biases remain, partly associated with errors in simulated synoptic systems and unresolved polar physical processes. The constrained-atmosphere experiment with spectral nudging shows improved agreement with observations in several quantitative metrics, particularly for atmospheric profiles and ocean temperature. However, sensitivity experiments indicate that these improvements depend on the vertical extent and strength of nudging and should not be attributed to the revised coupling or model physics alone. Remaining biases in atmospheric humidity, surface turbulent heat fluxes, snow accumulation, and ocean salinity highlight priorities for further development of atmospheric boundary-layer, cloud radiation, snow/sea ice, and coupled surface processes in CAPS and other Arctic prediction systems.
SN  - 1991-9603
ER  -