Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 54 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Hydrology: Regional Studies

Performance assessment of urban drainage systems using a river–pipe–surface coupled modeling approach

4 affiliations
  1. 1School of Geometics, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou, 310018, China; Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Urban Wetlands and Regional Change, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 311121, China
  2. 2School of Geometics, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou, 310018, China; Corresponding author.
  3. 3School of Geometics, Zhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou, 310018, China
  4. 4Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Urban Wetlands and Regional Change, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 311121, China

Abstract

Study Region: The HUA district represents a typical low-lying urbanized floodplain within a coastal megacity, where a high-density municipal pipe network directly intersects a dynamic river system, making it a regional model for studying compound waterlogging under the nonlinear interaction of localized precipitation and fluctuating downstream river boundaries. Study Focus: The research develops an integrated evaluation framework combining a river–pipe–land two-way dynamically coupled hydraulic model with a multi-level Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Remote sensing data is utilized to refine surface parameters, while a newly proposed Drainage Efficiency Indicator (DEI) system evaluates performance across four dimensions: system capacity, drainage impact, overall efficiency, and backwater suppression. The study analyzes 12 distinct scenarios to quantify the sensitivity of urban drainage to varying rainfall intensities, river stages, and outlet configurations. New Hydrological Insights: Analysis of the study area reveals that precipitation intensity is the primary determinant of drainage efficiency, exhibiting a strong non-linear negative correlation with the DEI score. A critical process-based finding is the peak-on-peak interaction, where the synchronization of the river flood peak and the maximum pipe discharge triggers transient backwater suppression, significantly extending the drainage recession time by up to 425% as return periods increase from 5a to 50a. Prescribed-stage experiments show that high receiving-river levels restrict drainage, while low levels enhance performance under the same local rainfall. The results also reveal an “integrated hydraulic limit” in the urban catchment: lowering outlet elevations reduces backflow risk, but marginal efficiency gains diminish during extreme events, indicating that downstream boundary conditions ultimately become the dominant constraint on system recovery.

Related

  1. Bioflocculation of polystyrene microplastics using dried Nostoc spp. biomass: laboratory performance, response modeling, and mechanistic assessment
    Fatemeh Keykha Akhar, Mohaddeseh Zahmatkesh Anbarani, Maryam Ameri +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Hydrology & soilsCrossref
  2. From standard to data-driven flow-based design of urban drainage and wastewater management systems: integrating variability, open data, and standardization
    Marcello Serrao, Natalia Duque Villarreal, Thibaud Maruejouls +8
    Water Science and TechnologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  3. Interannual and seasonal evolution of supraglacial drainage systems on Nivlisen Ice Shelf, East Antarctica
    Jiao Chen, Rebecca A. Hodge, Stewart S. R. Jamieson +1
    The CryospherePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyCrossref
  4. Response-surface optimization of high-performance GO-PET-PEG forward osmosis membranes for bentazone removal
    Mehdi Sarlak, Mehdi Shirzad-Siboni, Azita Mohagheghian +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsCrossref
  5. Evaluating the performance of the surface water and ocean topography (SWOT) mission for monitoring reservoirs across the conterminous United States
    Justin Huber, Peyman Abbaszadeh, Heejun Chang
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textHydrology & soilsCrossref
BibTeX
@article{chen2026performance,
  title = {{Performance assessment of urban drainage systems using a river–pipe–surface coupled modeling approach}},
  author = {Chaohui Chen and Yuzhou Zhang and Peng Wu and Luoyang Wang and Yihan Lou and Tangao Hu},
  journal = {Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.104119},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.104119},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Performance assessment of urban drainage systems using a river–pipe–surface coupled modeling approach
AU  - Chaohui Chen
AU  - Yuzhou Zhang
AU  - Peng Wu
AU  - Luoyang Wang
AU  - Yihan Lou
AU  - Tangao Hu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
DO  - 10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.104119
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.104119
AB  - Study Region: The HUA district represents a typical low-lying urbanized floodplain within a coastal megacity, where a high-density municipal pipe network directly intersects a dynamic river system, making it a regional model for studying compound waterlogging under the nonlinear interaction of localized precipitation and fluctuating downstream river boundaries. Study Focus: The research develops an integrated evaluation framework combining a river–pipe–land two-way dynamically coupled hydraulic model with a multi-level Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Remote sensing data is utilized to refine surface parameters, while a newly proposed Drainage Efficiency Indicator (DEI) system evaluates performance across four dimensions: system capacity, drainage impact, overall efficiency, and backwater suppression. The study analyzes 12 distinct scenarios to quantify the sensitivity of urban drainage to varying rainfall intensities, river stages, and outlet configurations. New Hydrological Insights: Analysis of the study area reveals that precipitation intensity is the primary determinant of drainage efficiency, exhibiting a strong non-linear negative correlation with the DEI score. A critical process-based finding is the peak-on-peak interaction, where the synchronization of the river flood peak and the maximum pipe discharge triggers transient backwater suppression, significantly extending the drainage recession time by up to 425% as return periods increase from 5a to 50a. Prescribed-stage experiments show that high receiving-river levels restrict drainage, while low levels enhance performance under the same local rainfall. The results also reveal an “integrated hydraulic limit” in the urban catchment: lowering outlet elevations reduces backflow risk, but marginal efficiency gains diminish during extreme events, indicating that downstream boundary conditions ultimately become the dominant constraint on system recovery.
SN  - 2214-5818
ER  -