Free-Breathing PDFF and R2* Quantification at 0.55T: Reduced Respiratory Motion Sensitivity and a Time-Resolved 4D MRI Approach

@misc{wong2026freebreathing,
  title = {{Free-Breathing PDFF and R2* Quantification at 0.55T: Reduced Respiratory Motion Sensitivity and a Time-Resolved 4D MRI Approach}},
  author = {Jeffery Wong and Jingjia Chen and Ding Xia and Xiang Xu and Els Fieremans and Dmitry S. Novikov and Hersh Chandarana and Li Feng},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.23240},
  eprint = {2609.23240},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23240},
}

TY  - UNPB
TI  - Free-Breathing PDFF and R2* Quantification at 0.55T: Reduced Respiratory Motion Sensitivity and a Time-Resolved 4D MRI Approach
AU  - Jeffery Wong
AU  - Jingjia Chen
AU  - Ding Xia
AU  - Xiang Xu
AU  - Els Fieremans
AU  - Dmitry S. Novikov
AU  - Hersh Chandarana
AU  - Li Feng
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/19
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.23240
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23240
AB  - Purpose: Free-breathing multi-echo MRI enables hepatic PDFF/R2* quantification without breath-holds, but respiratory motion can affect R2* estimation through motion-induced field variations. We investigated whether respiratory motion sensitivity is reduced at 0.55T versus 3T and developed a time-resolved free-breathing 4D MRI approach without respiratory binning. Methods: A navigator-embedded multi-echo stack-of-stars sequence was implemented. Ten subjects were scanned during free breathing and deliberate bulk motion at both 3T and 0.55T. Data were reconstructed using motion-averaged, motion-resolved, and time-resolved approaches. Quantitative performance was also evaluated in a PDFF/R2* phantom using Cartesian and radial acquisitions. Results: Phantom experiments showed close radial-Cartesian agreement for R2* and PDFF at 3T. At 0.55T, R2* showed good agreement over the low-to-moderate range but higher uncertainty at high R2*, where larger radial-Cartesian PDFF differences were also observed. R2* was substantially less sensitive to respiratory motion at 0.55T than at 3T, whereas PDFF was relatively insensitive at both field strengths. Under bulk motion, time-resolved reconstruction provided robust R2* and PDFF measurements, with particularly high consistency between free-breathing and bulk-motion acquisitions at 0.55T. Conclusion: R2* quantification was less sensitive to respiratory motion at 0.55T than at 3T, while PDFF remained relatively insensitive. Time-resolved reconstruction provided additional robustness to bulk motion. Reduced susceptibility effects at 0.55T and time-resolved reconstruction may provide complementary advantages for motion-robust free-breathing hepatic R2* and PDFF quantification.
ER  -