Power Consumption of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) Workstations: Quantification and Comparison of Operational Modes.
- 1Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, USA.
- 2Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, AUT.
Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to quantify the power consumption of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) workstations across common operating modes.Materials and methods
Power consumption was measured for three PACS workstation setups (two hospital-based, one home-based) across five operating modes, including active, standby, powered-down, and transition states. Measurements were conducted using an external power meter, with three repeated measurements per mode and setting (total N = 45). Static modes were extrapolated from 10-minute intervals; dynamic modes included measured duration. Statistical analysis assessed variability and differences between settings. Departmental consumption was estimated by scaling per-workstation data to 105 units and benchmarked against common household appliances. Conversion ratios and break-even times for transitioning between modes were calculated.Results
Measurement variability was low, with no significant differences between repetitions or inclusion of mammography workstations. At the departmental level, the total consumption reached 24.99 kW in full operation. Even non-active states had considerable power consumption (18.37 kW logged off; 2.41 kW powered down). Mode comparisons showed up to 7.61-fold differences in power consumption. Break-even times were 6.67 minutes (logged-off to active) and 5.86 minutes (powered-down to active), indicating short idle periods justify reduced-power states.Conclusion
PACS workstations represent a substantial and likely underrecognized source of power consumption in radiology. Quantitative insights and simple decision tools, such as the conversion factors and break-even times presented in this study, can support more energy-efficient workstation management and reduce the environmental impact of radiology operations.
Related
- Quantification of plaque and detection of high-risk plaque characteristics based on coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison between superresolution deep learning reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction
- Licit and illicit drug consumption in the Paris conurbation: assessing short to mid-term temporal trends through WBE and comparison with official statistics
- Comparison of modeling strategies to study the effect of an exposure on changes in continuous outcomes: evaluating the impact of alcohol consumption on changes in cardiometabolic health markers based on the German National Cohort (NAKO).
- Pro-vaccination communication requires tailoring: Evidence from an experimental and longitudinal comparison of communication strategies on vaccination-related cognition and intentions
- Communication Profiles in School-Age Children with Congenital Blindness: A Matched Comparison Study
BibTeX
@article{kuhn2026power,
title = {{Power Consumption of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) Workstations: Quantification and Comparison of Operational Modes.}},
author = {Anna Luisa Kühn and Domenic Mongillo and Bilal El Kaddouri and Seyedeh Panid Madani and Daria Kifjak and Alexander A Bankier},
journal = {Cureus},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.7759/cureus.116698},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42923706},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Power Consumption of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) Workstations: Quantification and Comparison of Operational Modes.
AU - Anna Luisa Kühn
AU - Domenic Mongillo
AU - Bilal El Kaddouri
AU - Seyedeh Panid Madani
AU - Daria Kifjak
AU - Alexander A Bankier
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/22
JO - Cureus
DO - 10.7759/cureus.116698
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42923706
AB - Purpose This study aimed to quantify the power consumption of Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) workstations across common operating modes.Materials and methods Power consumption was measured for three PACS workstation setups (two hospital-based, one home-based) across five operating modes, including active, standby, powered-down, and transition states. Measurements were conducted using an external power meter, with three repeated measurements per mode and setting (total N = 45). Static modes were extrapolated from 10-minute intervals; dynamic modes included measured duration. Statistical analysis assessed variability and differences between settings. Departmental consumption was estimated by scaling per-workstation data to 105 units and benchmarked against common household appliances. Conversion ratios and break-even times for transitioning between modes were calculated.Results Measurement variability was low, with no significant differences between repetitions or inclusion of mammography workstations. At the departmental level, the total consumption reached 24.99 kW in full operation. Even non-active states had considerable power consumption (18.37 kW logged off; 2.41 kW powered down). Mode comparisons showed up to 7.61-fold differences in power consumption. Break-even times were 6.67 minutes (logged-off to active) and 5.86 minutes (powered-down to active), indicating short idle periods justify reduced-power states.Conclusion PACS workstations represent a substantial and likely underrecognized source of power consumption in radiology. Quantitative insights and simple decision tools, such as the conversion factors and break-even times presented in this study, can support more energy-efficient workstation management and reduce the environmental impact of radiology operations.
SN - 2168-8184
ER -