Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Exact distances and measurement allocation for logical Pauli readout

Abstract

The minimum fault weight of a logical readout depends jointly on data-error persistence, check redundancy and time-boundary constraints. For any binary check matrix H and nonzero parity support w, we prove that a repeated-readout model with a zero-syndrome endpoint has exact distance minw· y=1[wt(y)+qwt(Hy)] for at least q wrong readouts. This reduces the search over fault histories to one weighted spatial minimum and gives the minimum repetition count for each adjacent-column check in square Bacon--Shor and generalized Shor readouts. Combining those checks with redundant Gauss-check pair products yields an exact joint distance and an outcome-count optimum within the specified gauged-readout family. At target distance m, one round uses m2 outcomes, compared with m(2m−1) for the repeated baseline in the same phenomenological model. For a one-epoch bare-ancilla CNOT implementation, we prove a schedule-dependent distance upper bound by constructing an accepted wrong readout from one gate fault and outcome flips. The bound identifies necessary timing conditions for retaining the target distance and gives matching upper bounds of three for the best tested schedules at both m=3 and m=5.

Related

  1. Modeling Logical Gates and Readout of Superconducting Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill Qubits
    Mackenzie H. Shaw, Andrew C. Doherty, Arne L. Grimsmo
    PRX QuantumPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Quantum physics & quantum informationAPS
  2. Exponential logical-error reduction in quantum memories via optimal syndrome-measurement timing
    Tobias Haug, Kishor Bharti, Leandro Aolita
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Exact logical error rates for magic state cultivation
    Kwok Ho Wan, Ainhoa Zapirain
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Demonstration of a logical Bell-state measurement beyond the linear-optical limit
    Shreya Kumar, Simon D. Reiß, Peter van Loock +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions and Logical-Space Localization in Floquet Monitored Clifford Circuits
    Hyunsoo Ha, David A. Huse
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{an2026exact,
  title = {{Exact distances and measurement allocation for logical Pauli readout}},
  author = {Shuoming An and Fusheng Yang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.04306},
  eprint = {2610.04306},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04306},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Exact distances and measurement allocation for logical Pauli readout
AU  - Shuoming An
AU  - Fusheng Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.04306
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04306
AB  - The minimum fault weight of a logical readout depends jointly on data-error persistence, check redundancy and time-boundary constraints. For any binary check matrix H and nonzero parity support w, we prove that a repeated-readout model with a zero-syndrome endpoint has exact distance min_w· y=1[wt(y)+qwt(Hy)] for at least q wrong readouts. This reduces the search over fault histories to one weighted spatial minimum and gives the minimum repetition count for each adjacent-column check in square Bacon--Shor and generalized Shor readouts. Combining those checks with redundant Gauss-check pair products yields an exact joint distance and an outcome-count optimum within the specified gauged-readout family. At target distance m, one round uses m^2 outcomes, compared with m(2m−1) for the repeated baseline in the same phenomenological model. For a one-epoch bare-ancilla CNOT implementation, we prove a schedule-dependent distance upper bound by constructing an accepted wrong readout from one gate fault and outcome flips. The bound identifies necessary timing conditions for retaining the target distance and gives matching upper bounds of three for the best tested schedules at both m=3 and m=5.
ER  -