Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCEuropean heart journal open

Beneficial effects of cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome and coronary artery bypass grafting: Real-world evidence from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study update (CROS-III).

4 more authors
16 affiliations
  1. 1German Society of Prevention and Rehabilitation of Cardiovascular Diseases, Friedrich-Ebert-Ring 38, 56068 Koblenz, Germany.
  2. 2Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
  3. 3Department of Preventive and Rehabilitative Sport and Exercise Medicine, Institute of Cardiology and Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933 Cologne, Germany.
  4. 4Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120 Germany.
  5. 5German Pension Insurance Braunschweig-Hannover, Lange Weihe 6, 30880 Laatzen, Germany.
  6. 6Curschmann Klinik, Rehabilitation Hospital for Cardiac and Vascular Diseases and Diabetes, Saunaring 6, 23669 Timmendorfer Strand, Germany.
  7. 7Medical Faculty, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
  8. 8Cardiology Division, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue gabrielle-perret-gentil 4, 1204 Geneva, Switzerland.
  9. 9Medicine Campus Davos, Hochgebirgsklinik Davos, Herman-Burchard-Strasse 1, 7265 Davos Wolfgang, Switzerland.
  10. 10Department of Sports and Exercise Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Karl Landsteiner University, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500 Krems, Austria.
  11. 11Institute of Clinical Sports Medicine and Prevention, University Hospital Krems - NOE LGA, Mitterweg 10, 3500 Krems, Austria.
  12. 12Institute of General Practice, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Düsseldorf.
  13. 13Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Bremserstr. 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany.
  14. 14Department of Internal Medicine, Klinik Gais AG, Gäbrisstrasse 1172, 9056 Gais, Switzerland.
  15. 15University of Bern, Hochschulstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
  16. 16Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, 4 Soranou Ephessiou Street, 11257 Athens, Greece.

Abstract

To review the effects of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and in mixed populations treated with contemporary interventional, surgical and pharmacological therapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42025630588) including randomized controlled trials (RCT) and prospective/retrospective controlled cohort studies (pCCS/rCCS) was performed with total mortality as main endpoint. Additional endpoints were cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal cardiovascular events, and hospital readmissions. Subgroup analysis was performed for age and sex. From 40 included studies, 29 studies encompassing 308 514 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis, including 5 newly identified (published between 11/2018-09/2025) studies with 92 571 patients. In pCCS and rCCS, CR-participation was associated with significantly reduced total mortality in patients with ACS (n = 41 740; pCCS: HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15-0.69; rCCS: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.55-0.75) and with CABG (n = 17 998; rCCS: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.76). The effects regarding total mortality were similar in sex and age subgroups. Cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal stroke were decreased in ACS and CABG patients. In mixed populations, CR was associated with reduced hospital readmissions for any reason and for any cardiovascular event. Methodological and structural heterogeneity and low patient numbers prevented robust results. Based on observational data, participation in CR is associated with an improved prognosis in current patients after ACS, CABG and mixed populations, similarly for sex and age subgroups. Hence, CR should be an integral part of secondary prevention in those patients. Nevertheless, high-quality studies are needed to increase the CR evidence base further.

Related

  1. Telerehabilitation vs. centre-based cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome: results of the pragmatic TELECOR randomized trial
    European heart journal openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  2. Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (MICS-CABG) Versus Conventional Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (OPCAB): A Single-Center Analysis of Early Outcomes and Institutional Experience
    Muhammad Yasir Khan
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Age-Normalized Baseline Renal Function: A Simple Risk Marker in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Novel cardiac computed tomography-based preoperative indicator associated with intraoperative graft flow in coronary artery bypass grafting
    Xiaohang Wang, Shen Lin, Wei Feng +1
    Journal of thoracic diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Study
    Yanbin Lei, Guang Li, Zhao Yang +1
    Reviews in cardiovascular medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{salzwedel2026beneficial,
  title = {{Beneficial effects of cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome and coronary artery bypass grafting: Real-world evidence from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study update (CROS-III).}},
  author = {Annett Salzwedel and Johannes A Vey and Birna Bjarnason-Wehrens and Axel Schlitt and Bernhard Schwaab and Elena Tessitore and Amina Cheikh Rouhou and David Niederseer and Mahdi Sareban and Greta Hametner and Maria-Inti Metzendorf and Gloria Petrasch and Steffen Schneider and Jean-Paul Schmid and Bernhard Rauch and Constantinos H Davos},
  journal = {European heart journal open},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1093/ehjopen/oeag152},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953095},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Beneficial effects of cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome and coronary artery bypass grafting: Real-world evidence from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study update (CROS-III).
AU  - Annett Salzwedel
AU  - Johannes A Vey
AU  - Birna Bjarnason-Wehrens
AU  - Axel Schlitt
AU  - Bernhard Schwaab
AU  - Elena Tessitore
AU  - Amina Cheikh Rouhou
AU  - David Niederseer
AU  - Mahdi Sareban
AU  - Greta Hametner
AU  - Maria-Inti Metzendorf
AU  - Gloria Petrasch
AU  - Steffen Schneider
AU  - Jean-Paul Schmid
AU  - Bernhard Rauch
AU  - Constantinos H Davos
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
JO  - European heart journal open
DO  - 10.1093/ehjopen/oeag152
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953095
AB  - To review the effects of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and in mixed populations treated with contemporary interventional, surgical and pharmacological therapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42025630588) including randomized controlled trials (RCT) and prospective/retrospective controlled cohort studies (pCCS/rCCS) was performed with total mortality as main endpoint. Additional endpoints were cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal cardiovascular events, and hospital readmissions. Subgroup analysis was performed for age and sex. From 40 included studies, 29 studies encompassing 308 514 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis, including 5 newly identified (published between 11/2018-09/2025) studies with 92 571 patients. In pCCS and rCCS, CR-participation was associated with significantly reduced total mortality in patients with ACS (n = 41 740; pCCS: HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15-0.69; rCCS: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.55-0.75) and with CABG (n = 17 998; rCCS: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.76). The effects regarding total mortality were similar in sex and age subgroups. Cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal stroke were decreased in ACS and CABG patients. In mixed populations, CR was associated with reduced hospital readmissions for any reason and for any cardiovascular event. Methodological and structural heterogeneity and low patient numbers prevented robust results. Based on observational data, participation in CR is associated with an improved prognosis in current patients after ACS, CABG and mixed populations, similarly for sex and age subgroups. Hence, CR should be an integral part of secondary prevention in those patients. Nevertheless, high-quality studies are needed to increase the CR evidence base further.
SN  - 2752-4191
ER  -