Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,125 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of High Energy Physics

Dual is different: EFTs, axions and nonpropagating form fields in cosmology

5 affiliations
  1. 1McMaster University
  2. 2Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
  3. 3School of Theoretical Physics, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies
  4. 4DAMTP, University of Cambridge
  5. 5New York University Abu Dhabi

Abstract

A bstract : Scalar fields in 4D are known to have equivalent dual descriptions in terms of form-field gauge potentials, but this is often regarded as an arcane fact. Why use more complicated formulations when simpler scalar descriptions exist and are equivalent? We describe three ways in which scalars that arise as duals can differ from their garden-variety counterparts. Two of these — the interchange of weak and strong couplings and utility in bringing topological information to the low-energy theory — are relatively well-known, but to these we add a third: dualities that map derivative interactions to non-derivative interactions seem not to commute with the general power-counting arguments that quantify control over the low-energy approximation within any EFT involving gravity. Since both sides of the duality must agree on their low-energy limit, the non-derivative interactions on the scalar side of the duality turn out to be suppressed relative to what would generically be assumed. They are nonetheless technically natural, as is particularly clear in the dual formulation. We argue that scalar fields arising as duals (such as the universal axion a a from string vacua) that have the commonly assumed Jμ ∂μa J μ ∂ μ a interaction with matter also have J μ J μ contact interactions among the respective currents, some of whose implications we explore. We also emphasize the non-trivial role and cosmological implications of non-propagating 3-form gauge potentials and clarify confusing statements recently made in the literature regarding the validity of duality for massive form fields.

Related

  1. The Cosmology of Hawking Axions
    Abdelaziz Hussein, Gordan Krnjaic, Sarunas Verner
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  2. Tracing out massive fields in cosmology
    Guanhao Sun, Sam S. C. Wong
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  3. B-fields In STar-forming Region Observations (BISTRO): Dual-Wavelength Constraints on Size-Dependent Grain Alignment in Star-Forming Regions
    Ray S. Furuya, David Berry, Pierre Bastien +65
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGalaxiesInstrumentation & methodsarXiv
  4. Multiple axions in laboratory experiments
    Arturo de Giorgi, Joerg Jaeckel, Sebastian Monath +1
    JHEPPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral astronomyHigh-energy & particle physicsHAL
  5. Axions and the RR Lyrae Period-Luminosity Relation
    Jeremy Sakstein, Djuna Croon
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyGalaxiesarXiv
BibTeX
@article{burgess2026dual,
  title = {{Dual is different: EFTs, axions and nonpropagating form fields in cosmology}},
  author = {C. P. Burgess and F. Quevedo},
  journal = {Journal of High Energy Physics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/jhep10(2026)069},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/JHEP10(2026)069},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dual is different: EFTs, axions and nonpropagating form fields in cosmology
AU  - C. P. Burgess
AU  - F. Quevedo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - Journal of High Energy Physics
DO  - 10.1007/jhep10(2026)069
UR  - https://link.springer.com/10.1007/JHEP10(2026)069
AB  - A bstract : Scalar fields in 4D are known to have equivalent dual descriptions in terms of form-field gauge potentials, but this is often regarded as an arcane fact. Why use more complicated formulations when simpler scalar descriptions exist and are equivalent? We describe three ways in which scalars that arise as duals can differ from their garden-variety counterparts. Two of these — the interchange of weak and strong couplings and utility in bringing topological information to the low-energy theory — are relatively well-known, but to these we add a third: dualities that map derivative interactions to non-derivative interactions seem not to commute with the general power-counting arguments that quantify control over the low-energy approximation within any EFT involving gravity. Since both sides of the duality must agree on their low-energy limit, the non-derivative interactions on the scalar side of the duality turn out to be suppressed relative to what would generically be assumed. They are nonetheless technically natural, as is particularly clear in the dual formulation. We argue that scalar fields arising as duals (such as the universal axion a a from string vacua) that have the commonly assumed J^μ ∂_μa J μ ∂ μ a interaction with matter also have J μ J μ contact interactions among the respective currents, some of whose implications we explore. We also emphasize the non-trivial role and cosmological implications of non-propagating 3-form gauge potentials and clarify confusing statements recently made in the literature regarding the validity of duality for massive form fields.
SN  - 1029-8479
ER  -