Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Nutrients

Digital Nutrition Care Ecosystem: Integrating Critical AI Nutrition Literacy, Countering Nutrition Misinformation, and Dietitian-Led Care

  1. 1Department of Clinical Nutrition, Lee’s Clinic, 130 Min-Zu Rd., Pingtung 90000, Taiwan
  2. 2Department of Internal Medicine, Lee’s Clinic, 130 Min-Zu Rd., Pingtung 90000, Taiwan
  3. 3Department of Nursing, Lee’s Clinic, 130 Min-Zu Rd., Pingtung 90000, Taiwan

Abstract

Chatbots and digital tools can make nutrition information more accessible, yet fluent explanations and precise-looking nutrient estimates may conceal unverified assumptions, portion-size errors, and inconsistent outputs. However, few frameworks connect critical appraisal of such outputs with routine clinical nutrition workflows and education. Building on a comparison of dietitian and chatbot interpretations of ready-to-eat meal labels, we propose the Digital Nutrition Care Ecosystem (DNCE), a human-supervised, Nutrition Care Process-aligned framework that links clinical nutrition workflows with critical AI nutrition literacy. DNCE connects eight functions: data acquisition, data integration, intelligence, nutrition diagnosis and clinical decision-making, individualized medical nutrition therapy, food implementation, delivery and engagement, and monitoring and learning. Within this ecosystem, dietitians are not replaced: repetitive, reversible, verifiable tasks may be supported by automation, whereas interpretation, individualized decisions, counseling, and final authorization remain professionally supervised. The paper contributes a proposed five-question educational checklist addressing (1) information source, (2) serving size, (3) assumptions and uncertainty, (4) consistency and verification, and (5) escalation before consequential action. Expected benefits include better recognition of unsupported nutrition claims, appropriate help-seeking, less correction work, and more dietitian time for judgment-intensive care. DNCE and the checklist are conceptual proposals that require empirical validation.

Related

  1. Fueling Bright Futures: a mixed-methods case study on integrating gardens, canteens, and nutrition training in philippine public schools.
    Mai A Hoang, Patricia Isabel A Matienzo, Diana Jean Umali +9
    BMC public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  2. Integrating Systemic Inflammation, Nutrition and Skeletal Muscle into a Composite Score (the HALP–Sarcopenia Combined Index) for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Lymph-Node Metastasis and Recurrence in Endometrial Carcinoma: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study
    Qingqing Zhang, Danfeng Guo, Dan Li
    International Journal of Women's HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsPMC
  3. Integrating macro- and meso-level perspectives on school nutrition programs in Dubai: a joint display mixed methods integration study.
    Reem AlGurg, Farah Otaki, Khadija Albloushi +5
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  4. AIDCare: A Technical Proof-of-Concept for Integrating Personalized Nutrition, Physical Activity, and AI-Assisted Care in Diabetes Lifestyle Management
    Adnan Kavak, Muhammad Jamil, Halil Bahadır Arın +7
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNutritionCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Nutrition Knowledge, Information Sources, and Self-Perceived Ability to Provide Nutrition Counseling Among Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Eva Luyufeng Yáñez-Izquierdo, Ana Presa-Carrera, Carlos Enrique Adán-Failde +1
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{yeh2026digital,
  title = {{Digital Nutrition Care Ecosystem: Integrating Critical AI Nutrition Literacy, Countering Nutrition Misinformation, and Dietitian-Led Care}},
  author = {Wen-Chin Yeh and Chung-Mei Ouyang and Yau-Jiunn Lee and Hui-Chun Hsu},
  journal = {Nutrients},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/nu18213663},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3663},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Digital Nutrition Care Ecosystem: Integrating Critical AI Nutrition Literacy, Countering Nutrition Misinformation, and Dietitian-Led Care
AU  - Wen-Chin Yeh
AU  - Chung-Mei Ouyang
AU  - Yau-Jiunn Lee
AU  - Hui-Chun Hsu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/04
JO  - Nutrients
DO  - 10.3390/nu18213663
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3663
AB  - Chatbots and digital tools can make nutrition information more accessible, yet fluent explanations and precise-looking nutrient estimates may conceal unverified assumptions, portion-size errors, and inconsistent outputs. However, few frameworks connect critical appraisal of such outputs with routine clinical nutrition workflows and education. Building on a comparison of dietitian and chatbot interpretations of ready-to-eat meal labels, we propose the Digital Nutrition Care Ecosystem (DNCE), a human-supervised, Nutrition Care Process-aligned framework that links clinical nutrition workflows with critical AI nutrition literacy. DNCE connects eight functions: data acquisition, data integration, intelligence, nutrition diagnosis and clinical decision-making, individualized medical nutrition therapy, food implementation, delivery and engagement, and monitoring and learning. Within this ecosystem, dietitians are not replaced: repetitive, reversible, verifiable tasks may be supported by automation, whereas interpretation, individualized decisions, counseling, and final authorization remain professionally supervised. The paper contributes a proposed five-question educational checklist addressing (1) information source, (2) serving size, (3) assumptions and uncertainty, (4) consistency and verification, and (5) escalation before consequential action. Expected benefits include better recognition of unsupported nutrition claims, appropriate help-seeking, less correction work, and more dietitian time for judgment-intensive care. DNCE and the checklist are conceptual proposals that require empirical validation.
SN  - 2072-6643
ER  -