Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology

Reactive Countermovement Jump Mechanics Across Basketball Experience Levels.

  1. 1Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Belgrade, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia.

Abstract

Countermovement jumps are usually tested as self-initiated maximal efforts, although many sport actions require athletes to react to an external event and still jump as high as possible. Background and Objectives: We examined how this rapid-initiation requirement was associated with CMJ mechanics, whether the pattern was similar across levels of basketball-specific experience, and whether arm swing altered the response. Methods: Forty-four men (15 physically active non-basketball controls, 15 mid-level basketball players, and 14 high-level basketball players) performed countermovement jumps with and without arm swing in four fixed-order blocks. Trial-level linear mixed-effects models included 564 valid attempts. Results: In the signal-initiated blocks, movement time was 0.091 s shorter (95% CI -0.103 to -0.078) and jump height was 1.63 cm lower (95% CI -2.04 to -1.21). Unloading (-0.069 s), braking (-0.011 s), and propulsion (-0.010 s) were all shorter; countermovement depth decreased, peak downward speed increased, and net propulsive impulse fell by 0.052 N s/kg despite a small increase in mean net propulsive force. Movement time decreased in all six group-by-jump cells. The jump-height reduction was statistically clear at the group level but small and of uncertain practical relevance for individuals. Basketball-specific experience did not clearly moderate the main condition effects. Arm swing reduced the movement-time difference by 0.043 s but did not clearly reduce the jump-height difference. Conclusion: The rapid-initiation condition was associated with a broad reorganization of movement timing and force-time strategy, with a smaller change in endpoint performance. Because the conditions were always performed in the same order, these findings should be interpreted as fixed-order condition differences and confirmed in counterbalanced designs.

Related

  1. Exploratory characterization of joint angular-velocity patterns during basketball jump shots across distances using OpenCap and multivariate functional principal component analysis.
    Ziyang Feng, Zhonghao Xie, Zhiguan Huang +4
    BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  2. Beyond the Sagittal Plane: The Lateral Countermovement Jump as a Clinical Tool for Return-to-Play Decision-Making and Performance Evaluation
    International journal of sports physical therapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Functional Deorphanization of Tumor-reactive TCRs Uncovers a Landscape of Shared, Immune Dominant Antigens across Cancers
    O. Bricard, R. Seyed Rahmani, F. Peeters +14
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textOncologybioRxiv
  4. Combined Use of Topic-Analysis and LLMs on Online Peer-to-Peer Medicaid Discussions to Detect the Impact of HR1 on Individuals Medicaid Experience Across The US
    V. M. Kudesia
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  5. Cancer incidence following platelet count and C-reactive protein testing across ethnic groups in English primary care: a cohort study of 5 million patients
    Melissa Barlow, Liz Down, Luke T A Mounce +4
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefPMC
BibTeX
@article{bozovic2026reactive,
  title = {{Reactive Countermovement Jump Mechanics Across Basketball Experience Levels.}},
  author = {Branislav Božović and Jelena Aleksić and Radivoj Mandić and Miloš Mudrić and Olivera M Knežević and Dragan M Mirkov},
  journal = {Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jfmk11040406},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42924685},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reactive Countermovement Jump Mechanics Across Basketball Experience Levels.
AU  - Branislav Božović
AU  - Jelena Aleksić
AU  - Radivoj Mandić
AU  - Miloš Mudrić
AU  - Olivera M Knežević
AU  - Dragan M Mirkov
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/04
JO  - Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology
DO  - 10.3390/jfmk11040406
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42924685
AB  - Countermovement jumps are usually tested as self-initiated maximal efforts, although many sport actions require athletes to react to an external event and still jump as high as possible. Background and Objectives: We examined how this rapid-initiation requirement was associated with CMJ mechanics, whether the pattern was similar across levels of basketball-specific experience, and whether arm swing altered the response. Methods: Forty-four men (15 physically active non-basketball controls, 15 mid-level basketball players, and 14 high-level basketball players) performed countermovement jumps with and without arm swing in four fixed-order blocks. Trial-level linear mixed-effects models included 564 valid attempts. Results: In the signal-initiated blocks, movement time was 0.091 s shorter (95% CI -0.103 to -0.078) and jump height was 1.63 cm lower (95% CI -2.04 to -1.21). Unloading (-0.069 s), braking (-0.011 s), and propulsion (-0.010 s) were all shorter; countermovement depth decreased, peak downward speed increased, and net propulsive impulse fell by 0.052 N s/kg despite a small increase in mean net propulsive force. Movement time decreased in all six group-by-jump cells. The jump-height reduction was statistically clear at the group level but small and of uncertain practical relevance for individuals. Basketball-specific experience did not clearly moderate the main condition effects. Arm swing reduced the movement-time difference by 0.043 s but did not clearly reduce the jump-height difference. Conclusion: The rapid-initiation condition was associated with a broad reorganization of movement timing and force-time strategy, with a smaller change in endpoint performance. Because the conditions were always performed in the same order, these findings should be interpreted as fixed-order condition differences and confirmed in counterbalanced designs.
SN  - 2411-5142
ER  -