Adapting Pairs Trading to Gambling Markets A Case Study of the U.S. Presidential Election
Abstract
Pairs trading exploits mean reversion in the relationship between related assets. We adapt this idea to political betting markets by modelling the combined implied probability of the two major-party nominees with a latent Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process whose mean-reversion level varies over time and whose observations contain additive noise. Model parameters are estimated from regularly sampled odds data using a state-space likelihood, with consecutive repeated values represented by a single retained observation and the elapsed number of sampling intervals preserved in the continuous-time transition. Parametric-bootstrap upper prediction bounds identify signal times at which the combined implied probability is likely to decline, and a no-intercept Bradley-Terry-type model selects the candidate-specific odds quote. The candidate-selection model is trained on 2020 U.S. presidential-election data and evaluated out of sample on 2024 data. The 2024 analysis produced 130 signals, empirical one-step coverage of 95.1%, a mean synthetic odds-price return of 1.86%, and an unannualized per-trade Sharpe-type ratio of 1.12. These returns are frictionless descriptive quantities rather than executable betting-exchange profits. The results support the integrated framework as a proof of concept for two-candidate electoral markets.
Related
- A note on markets with semi-static trading strategies
- Thin Trading and the Singularity Spectrum: Evidence from Tokenized Carbon Markets
- Dynamic Multi-Pair Trading Strategy in Cryptocurrency Markets with Deep Reinforcement Learning
- STV Audit Graphs: A Visual Tool to Measure Election Stability
- Issue Bias in Generative AI Writing Assistance: Political Issues and LLMs in the Swedish 2026 Election
BibTeX
@misc{liu2026adapting,
title = {{Adapting Pairs Trading to Gambling Markets A Case Study of the U.S. Presidential Election}},
author = {Haoyu Liu and Len Thomas and Benjamin Baer and Carl Donovan},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.22639},
eprint = {2609.22639},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22639},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Adapting Pairs Trading to Gambling Markets A Case Study of the U.S. Presidential Election
AU - Haoyu Liu
AU - Len Thomas
AU - Benjamin Baer
AU - Carl Donovan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/18
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.22639
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22639
AB - Pairs trading exploits mean reversion in the relationship between related assets. We adapt this idea to political betting markets by modelling the combined implied probability of the two major-party nominees with a latent Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process whose mean-reversion level varies over time and whose observations contain additive noise. Model parameters are estimated from regularly sampled odds data using a state-space likelihood, with consecutive repeated values represented by a single retained observation and the elapsed number of sampling intervals preserved in the continuous-time transition. Parametric-bootstrap upper prediction bounds identify signal times at which the combined implied probability is likely to decline, and a no-intercept Bradley-Terry-type model selects the candidate-specific odds quote. The candidate-selection model is trained on 2020 U.S. presidential-election data and evaluated out of sample on 2024 data. The 2024 analysis produced 130 signals, empirical one-step coverage of 95.1%, a mean synthetic odds-price return of 1.86%, and an unannualized per-trade Sharpe-type ratio of 1.12. These returns are frictionless descriptive quantities rather than executable betting-exchange profits. The results support the integrated framework as a proof of concept for two-candidate electoral markets.
ER -