Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Preparation Changes the Cost of Calibration for Quantum Control

Abstract

Error-correction records can reveal noise yet supply the information needed for control too slowly. In a surface code under Gaussian dephasing, encoded calibration learns a correlation that reverses the preferred control mainly through rare events. A product probe exposes it more often through the same checks, reducing ideal-record sample complexity from inverse-square to inverse-linear in phase variance. Counting both calibration and execution costs, we show that this gain can repay probe overhead and enable protected tasks within budgets that exclude encoded calibration.

Related

  1. Extremely Low-Cost Magic State Preparation toward Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing
    Jianshuo Gao, Xiao Yuan, Yuan Yao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Coherence-assisted quantum state preparation and thermal control through repeated interactions
    Alessandro Prositto, Dvira Segal
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryAtomic, molecular & optical physicsarXiv
  3. Verification Meets Calibration: Bounds and Secret-Independent State Preparation with an NV-Center as a Case Study
    Ezra Acalapati, Elham Kashefi, Cica Gustiani
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Reducing the Cost of Qudit State Preparation by Learning a Sparse Structure for SNAP Gates
    Marco Pennazio, Leonardo Ignazio Pagliochini, Riccardo Pellini +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. FlowReconBench: Accuracy, calibration and cost of learned and classical flow reconstruction from sparse sensors
    Nicolas Tricard, Linzheng Wang, Jason Chen +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textFluid dynamicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{deng2026preparation,
  title = {{Preparation Changes the Cost of Calibration for Quantum Control}},
  author = {Xiu-Hao Deng},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.30910},
  eprint = {2609.30910},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30910},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Preparation Changes the Cost of Calibration for Quantum Control
AU  - Xiu-Hao Deng
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.30910
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30910
AB  - Error-correction records can reveal noise yet supply the information needed for control too slowly. In a surface code under Gaussian dephasing, encoded calibration learns a correlation that reverses the preferred control mainly through rare events. A product probe exposes it more often through the same checks, reducing ideal-record sample complexity from inverse-square to inverse-linear in phase variance. Counting both calibration and execution costs, we show that this gain can repay probe overhead and enable protected tasks within budgets that exclude encoded calibration.
ER  -