How reliable are clinical balance and ataxia scales in healthy children aged 4-12 years? An inter-rater reliability and construct validity study of the PBS, SARA, and BARS.
5 affiliations
- 1Department of Child Neurology, School of Medicine, Biruni University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
- 2Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Biruni University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
- 3Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Biruni University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
- 4Biruni Scientific Research Center (B@MER/BAMER), Faculty of Medicine, Biruni University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
- 5Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Biruni University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Abstract
Background
No study has evaluated the Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS), the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), and the Brief Ataxia Rating Scale (BARS) together in a healthy pediatric sample.Objective
This study aimed to determine the inter-rater reliability, measurement error, and construct validity of the PBS, SARA, and BARS in healthy children aged 4-12 years and to compare scores between physiotherapists and pediatric neurologists.Methods
Thirty-four healthy children (18 girls and 16 boys; mean age 8.2 ± 1.8 years) were each scored from standardized video recordings by five independent, mutually blinded raters (two physiotherapists and three pediatric neurologists). Inter-rater reliability was quantified using two-way random-effects and absolute-agreement intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), reported as single-rater [ICC (2,1)] and average-of-five-raters [ICC (2, k)] measures. Standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC₉₅), Cronbach's α, Bland-Altman agreement, Spearman inter-scale correlations, and Kruskal-Wallis tests of rater differences were calculated.Results
Average-measure reliability was good for the PBS (ICC2k = 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.94) and the SARA (0.85, 0.74-0.92) but moderate for the BARS (0.64, 0.41-0.80). Single-rater reliability was moderate for the PBS (0.61) and the SARA (0.53) but poor for the BARS (0.27). The BARS was attenuated by a floor effect (20.6% scored zero) rather than rater disagreement, which Bland-Altman confirmed to be small. Construct validity was supported: The PBS negatively correlated with the SARA (ρ = -0.76) and the BARS (ρ = -0.59), and the SARA positively correlated with the BARS (ρ = 0.87; all p < 0.001), which remained unchanged in the non-zero-BARS subgroup. No sex differences emerged.Conclusion
In healthy children, the PBS, the SARA, and the BARS are reliable when averaged across raters and show coherent construct validity. Single-rater use is adequate for the PBS and the SARA but limited for the BARS in this floor-dominated population. Age-referenced interpretation of the PBS is warranted. Establishing the reliability and normative characteristics of these scales in typically developing children will facilitate more accurate interpretation of pediatric ataxia and balance assessments in both clinical practice and research.
Related
- Reliability and Validity of the Australian Mental Health Triage Scale in Children's Hospitals.
- Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Movement Behaviour Questionnaire-Child (MBQ-C) for assessing active play, screen time, and sleep in preschool children
- Instrumented assessment of joint neuromechanics in upper motor neuron syndrome: a systematic review of methods, reliability, validity, and clinical relevance.
- Assessing the construct validity of cross-national harmonized cognitive assessments using age.
- Longitudinal Tracking and Construct Validity of a Single-Item Physical Activity Measure in the Womens Healthy Ageing Project
BibTeX
@article{arslan2026reliable,
title = {{How reliable are clinical balance and ataxia scales in healthy children aged 4-12 years? An inter-rater reliability and construct validity study of the PBS, SARA, and BARS.}},
author = {Elif Acar Arslan and Ece Gültekin and Gülsena Utku Umut and İrem Güney and Cüneyd Parlayan and Abdullah Sert and Güzide Turanlı},
journal = {Frontiers in neurology},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fneur.2026.1935671},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903099},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - How reliable are clinical balance and ataxia scales in healthy children aged 4-12 years? An inter-rater reliability and construct validity study of the PBS, SARA, and BARS.
AU - Elif Acar Arslan
AU - Ece Gültekin
AU - Gülsena Utku Umut
AU - İrem Güney
AU - Cüneyd Parlayan
AU - Abdullah Sert
AU - Güzide Turanlı
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/06
JO - Frontiers in neurology
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2026.1935671
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903099
AB - Background No study has evaluated the Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS), the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), and the Brief Ataxia Rating Scale (BARS) together in a healthy pediatric sample.Objective This study aimed to determine the inter-rater reliability, measurement error, and construct validity of the PBS, SARA, and BARS in healthy children aged 4-12 years and to compare scores between physiotherapists and pediatric neurologists.Methods Thirty-four healthy children (18 girls and 16 boys; mean age 8.2 ± 1.8 years) were each scored from standardized video recordings by five independent, mutually blinded raters (two physiotherapists and three pediatric neurologists). Inter-rater reliability was quantified using two-way random-effects and absolute-agreement intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), reported as single-rater [ICC (2,1)] and average-of-five-raters [ICC (2, k)] measures. Standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC₉₅), Cronbach's α, Bland-Altman agreement, Spearman inter-scale correlations, and Kruskal-Wallis tests of rater differences were calculated.Results Average-measure reliability was good for the PBS (ICC2k = 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.94) and the SARA (0.85, 0.74-0.92) but moderate for the BARS (0.64, 0.41-0.80). Single-rater reliability was moderate for the PBS (0.61) and the SARA (0.53) but poor for the BARS (0.27). The BARS was attenuated by a floor effect (20.6% scored zero) rather than rater disagreement, which Bland-Altman confirmed to be small. Construct validity was supported: The PBS negatively correlated with the SARA (ρ = -0.76) and the BARS (ρ = -0.59), and the SARA positively correlated with the BARS (ρ = 0.87; all p < 0.001), which remained unchanged in the non-zero-BARS subgroup. No sex differences emerged.Conclusion In healthy children, the PBS, the SARA, and the BARS are reliable when averaged across raters and show coherent construct validity. Single-rater use is adequate for the PBS and the SARA but limited for the BARS in this floor-dominated population. Age-referenced interpretation of the PBS is warranted. Establishing the reliability and normative characteristics of these scales in typically developing children will facilitate more accurate interpretation of pediatric ataxia and balance assessments in both clinical practice and research.
SN - 1664-2295
ER -