Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDCirculation Journal

Current Status and Future Directions of Cardiovascular Intensive Care in Japan: Workforce, Structure, Education, and Regional Disparities ― Report of the Japan Critical Care Cardiology Committee (J4CS) ―

Abstract

Rapid population aging has increased the number of patients with severe acute cardiovascular diseases requiring intensive care. Contemporary cardiovascular intensive care has evolved beyond traditional management of acute coronary syndromes to encompass hemodynamic instability, multiple organ dysfunction, and advanced life-support technologies. Accordingly, cardiovascular intensive care units (CICUs) must provide comprehensive, tailored critical care for increasingly complex clinical conditions. In Japan, cardiovascular intensive care remains heterogeneous, with critically ill patients managed in various critical care settings. Structured care systems and specialist training remain underdeveloped. To clarify the current status, we reviewed nationwide survey data from the JROAD-DPC database. Substantial variability in institutional care systems, limited availability of dedicated cardiac care units/CICUs, and marked regional disparities in infrastructure and human resources were identified. Intensive care unit admission was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in cardiovascular emergencies, although these observational findings should be interpreted with caution because of potential residual confounding, differences in patient characteristics, and end-of-life care pathways. These findings support the need for appropriate triage and resource allocation according to patient acuity and institutional capability, rather than the uniform establishment of dedicated CICUs. Addressing these challenges will require optimized resource allocation, strengthened regional coordination, and structured training programs to establish sustainable cardiovascular intensive care systems in Japan.

Related

  1. Digital readiness for cardiovascular care in high-burden US communities with cardiology workforce constraints
    S. Perera, L. S. Dhingra, B. Batinica +2
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicinemedRxiv
  2. Disparities in Editorial Leadership of Highly Cited Cardiology Journals by Gender and Country Income Classification
    Ricardo J. Estrada‐Mendizabal, Ruben R. Osorio‐Godoy, Veronica Saldana‐Fraire +10
    Journal of the American Heart AssociationPeer-reviewedLicence not statedCardiovascular medicineCrossref
  3. Cardiovascular risk profile and treatment patterns in patients with type 2 diabetes in specialized cardiology outpatient care in Colombia : A retrospective cross-sectional study
    Lucia Suarez Maestre, Ingrith Paola Hoyos Montaño, Zenen David Rúa Osorio +3
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. [Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients receiving antithrombotic therapy in a cardiac intensive care unit in sub-Saharan Africa: a retrospective comparative study at the Cardiology Institute of Abidjan].
    Christelle Gbassi, Florent Koffi, Cédric Kee +10
    The Pan African medical journalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  5. 2026 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease, in collaboration with the European Renal Association (ERA): Developed by the task force on the management of cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
    Kevin Damman, Jozine M. ter Maaten, Kaitlin J. Mayne +97
    ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)Peer-reviewedCC BY-SAFull text24 citedCardiovascular medicineOpenAlexOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{nakata2026current,
  title = {{Current Status and Future Directions of Cardiovascular Intensive Care in Japan: Workforce, Structure, Education, and Regional Disparities ― Report of the Japan Critical Care Cardiology Committee (J4CS) ―}},
  author = {Jun Nakata and Shoji Kawakami and Toru Kondo and Masanari Kuwabara and Takahiro Nakashima and Keita Saku and Takeshi Yamamoto and Migaku Kikuchi and Ichiro Takeuchi and Kuniya Asai and Naoki Sato and on behalf of the Japanese Circulation Society Emergency and Critical Care Committee},
  journal = {Circulation Journal},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1253/circj.cj-26-0451},
  url = {https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/circj/advpub/0/advpub_CJ-26-0451/_article},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Current Status and Future Directions of Cardiovascular Intensive Care in Japan: Workforce, Structure, Education, and Regional Disparities ― Report of the Japan Critical Care Cardiology Committee (J4CS) ―
AU  - Jun Nakata
AU  - Shoji Kawakami
AU  - Toru Kondo
AU  - Masanari Kuwabara
AU  - Takahiro Nakashima
AU  - Keita Saku
AU  - Takeshi Yamamoto
AU  - Migaku Kikuchi
AU  - Ichiro Takeuchi
AU  - Kuniya Asai
AU  - Naoki Sato
AU  - on behalf of the Japanese Circulation Society Emergency and Critical Care Committee
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Circulation Journal
DO  - 10.1253/circj.cj-26-0451
UR  - https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/circj/advpub/0/advpub_CJ-26-0451/_article
AB  - Rapid population aging has increased the number of patients with severe acute cardiovascular diseases requiring intensive care. Contemporary cardiovascular intensive care has evolved beyond traditional management of acute coronary syndromes to encompass hemodynamic instability, multiple organ dysfunction, and advanced life-support technologies. Accordingly, cardiovascular intensive care units (CICUs) must provide comprehensive, tailored critical care for increasingly complex clinical conditions. In Japan, cardiovascular intensive care remains heterogeneous, with critically ill patients managed in various critical care settings. Structured care systems and specialist training remain underdeveloped. To clarify the current status, we reviewed nationwide survey data from the JROAD-DPC database. Substantial variability in institutional care systems, limited availability of dedicated cardiac care units/CICUs, and marked regional disparities in infrastructure and human resources were identified. Intensive care unit admission was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in cardiovascular emergencies, although these observational findings should be interpreted with caution because of potential residual confounding, differences in patient characteristics, and end-of-life care pathways. These findings support the need for appropriate triage and resource allocation according to patient acuity and institutional capability, rather than the uniform establishment of dedicated CICUs. Addressing these challenges will require optimized resource allocation, strengthened regional coordination, and structured training programs to establish sustainable cardiovascular intensive care systems in Japan.
SN  - 1347-4820
SN  - 1346-9843
ER  -