Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0arXiv

Unmasking Compensating Errors in Numerical Weather Models: A Process-Additive Neural Network Approach

Abstract

This work introduces a Process Additive Neural Network (PANN) framework to disentangle compensating biases in atmospheric models, where errors in different physical processes can offset each other and obscure their origins. Using a single-column model, each PANN branch represents the tendency error associated with a separate physical process, and the summed branch outputs approximate the total error relative to a reference tendency. Once trained successfully, the branch outputs are expected to provide process-level error attributions and, when averaged, estimates of process-level bias. Initial experiments focus on cloud-related processes in OpenIFS SCM case studies, where cloud and convection tendencies are strongly coupled and compensation is difficult to diagnose using standard approaches. The aim is not to replace human interpretation of physical processes, but to extend it to regimes where model complexity, process interaction, and compensating errors make direct diagnosis difficult. By providing a physically structured form of machine-learning interpretability, PANN can help connect complex model behaviour with process-level explanations. This work supports both improved understanding of compensating errors and the development of more physically consistent weather and climate models.

Related

  1. Probabilistic AI models outperform numerical weather prediction models on record breaking heat extremes
    Jakob Benjamin Wessel, Fiona Spuler, Christopher A. T. Ferro +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyStatisticsarXiv
  2. Comparison of data-driven and numerical weather prediction models for rainfall nowcasting in major cities of Bangladesh
    Sumia Akter, Jayeef Rahman Muaz, Rabiul Awal
    PLOS ClimatePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyStatisticsPLOS
  3. Impact of Two Radio Occultation Constellations on Numerical Weather Prediction: Polar‐Orbits Only and Mixed Polar‐Equatorial Orbits
    Nikki C. Privé, Christopher Barsoum, Douglas Hunt +4
    Earth and Space SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyCrossref
  4. WRF-JAX v1.1.28: a differentiable regional weather model with fully coupled physics, numerically consistent with WRF and matching 128-process CPU performance on a single GPU
    Shijin Yuan, Tianyu Shen, Bin Mu +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXivEGUsphere
  5. Fragile against what? Imagining climate change resilience by unmasking governance fragility.
    Luissa Vahedi, Carmen Logie
    DisastersPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textClimate scienceEurope PMC
BibTeX
@misc{ichikawa2026unmasking,
  title = {{Unmasking Compensating Errors in Numerical Weather Models: A Process-Additive Neural Network Approach}},
  author = {Yuiko Ichikawa and Edward Groot and Jack Atkinson},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.19772},
  eprint = {2610.19772},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19772},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Unmasking Compensating Errors in Numerical Weather Models: A Process-Additive Neural Network Approach
AU  - Yuiko Ichikawa
AU  - Edward Groot
AU  - Jack Atkinson
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.19772
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19772
AB  - This work introduces a Process Additive Neural Network (PANN) framework to disentangle compensating biases in atmospheric models, where errors in different physical processes can offset each other and obscure their origins. Using a single-column model, each PANN branch represents the tendency error associated with a separate physical process, and the summed branch outputs approximate the total error relative to a reference tendency. Once trained successfully, the branch outputs are expected to provide process-level error attributions and, when averaged, estimates of process-level bias. Initial experiments focus on cloud-related processes in OpenIFS SCM case studies, where cloud and convection tendencies are strongly coupled and compensation is difficult to diagnose using standard approaches. The aim is not to replace human interpretation of physical processes, but to extend it to regimes where model complexity, process interaction, and compensating errors make direct diagnosis difficult. By providing a physically structured form of machine-learning interpretability, PANN can help connect complex model behaviour with process-level explanations. This work supports both improved understanding of compensating errors and the development of more physically consistent weather and climate models.
ER  -