Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0arXiv

Co-designing a Layered Control Architecture

Abstract

Layered control architectures (LCAs) are ubiquitous in complex engineering systems. However, in practice they are largely designed ad hoc and mostly dictated by the experience of the designer. This is because there is currently no systematic and practically applicable theory available to holistically design LCAs. Hence, systematically reasoning about the optimality, stability, and feasibility of the LCA design is not possible. We set a first step toward such a theory by presenting a framework for co-designing a two-layer LCA for a linear time-invariant plant. The resulting co-design problem optimizes over architectural design variables (e.g., reduced order model dimension and sampling ratio between the layers) and tuning-based design variables (e.g., the numerical values of the feedback gain or the matrices of the reduced order model), all subject to constraints that ensure stability, feasibility, and compute properties of the closed-loop LCA. The proposed formulation allows to make informed tradeoffs along the Pareto front traced over different axes of optimality, e.g., speed, accuracy or computational effort. We demonstrate the effect of making various tradeoffs in a simple numerical example.

Related

  1. A Layered Simplex Architecture for Large Alphabets
    Meir Feder, Yaniv Fogel, Ruediger Urbanke
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Safety of layered control systems via control barrier morphisms
    Aaron D. Ames, Joe Moeller, Massimiliano de Sa +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. A Robust Control Architecture for Multirate Systems and their Interconnections
    Julian Berberich
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. From multi-layered problems to multiple two-layered problems: a novel frequency-time hybrid multiple-scattering integral equation solver
    Shuai Pan, Tao Yin, Lu Zhang
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  5. Designing Spatial Treatments
    Stefan Faridani, Michael P. Leung
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{verhoek2026codesigning,
  title = {{Co-designing a Layered Control Architecture}},
  author = {Chris Verhoek and Charis Stamouli and George J. Pappas and Nikolai Matni},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.20900},
  eprint = {2610.20900},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20900},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Co-designing a Layered Control Architecture
AU  - Chris Verhoek
AU  - Charis Stamouli
AU  - George J. Pappas
AU  - Nikolai Matni
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/14
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.20900
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20900
AB  - Layered control architectures (LCAs) are ubiquitous in complex engineering systems. However, in practice they are largely designed ad hoc and mostly dictated by the experience of the designer. This is because there is currently no systematic and practically applicable theory available to holistically design LCAs. Hence, systematically reasoning about the optimality, stability, and feasibility of the LCA design is not possible. We set a first step toward such a theory by presenting a framework for co-designing a two-layer LCA for a linear time-invariant plant. The resulting co-design problem optimizes over architectural design variables (e.g., reduced order model dimension and sampling ratio between the layers) and tuning-based design variables (e.g., the numerical values of the feedback gain or the matrices of the reduced order model), all subject to constraints that ensure stability, feasibility, and compute properties of the closed-loop LCA. The proposed formulation allows to make informed tradeoffs along the Pareto front traced over different axes of optimality, e.g., speed, accuracy or computational effort. We demonstrate the effect of making various tradeoffs in a simple numerical example.
ER  -