Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS Computational Biology

When models choose metrics: Hidden geometry in computational biology

  1. 1AIML, GSK, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, United States of America

Abstract

Computational biology often turns biological measurements into fitted models, embeddings, or summaries and then compares them with a distance chosen largely by convention. That choice can shape the scientific question being answered, because different distances emphasize different assumptions about noise, variation, and biological similarity. This Perspective describes the hidden geometry that can arise when a probabilistic model is specified carefully enough to support local metric structure. For regular parametric models, the Fisher information defines a natural local metric, making distance choice part of model specification rather than a separate plotting or clustering preference. Rather than replacing familiar heuristics, information geometry helps explain when common transformations, such as variance stabilization for RNA-seq, approximate a model-implied distance; when dependence or latent nuisance structure limits that approximation; and when misspecification makes empirical, nonparametric, or sensitivity-based comparisons more appropriate. The goal is a clearer, more explicit practice of metric choice.

Related

  1. PLoS Computational Biology Issue Image | Vol. 22(8) September 2026
    PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Evolutionary biologyNeurosciencePLOS
  2. On the Computational Complexity of Hidden Markov Model Identification
    Markel Zubia, Nils Jansen
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. A Class of Rényi-based Concentration Metrics for Kolmogorov-Arnold Geometry in Multilayer Perceptrons
    Juan Carlos Fernández, Asunción Jiménez-Cordero, José Francisco Paris
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. The Statistical Geometry of Latent Recovery in Hidden Markov Models
    Trang Pham, Dung Le, Alessandro Rinaldo +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Choose your own adventure: How data source selection shapes urban accessibility analyses
    Geoff Boeing, Jiyoon Kim, Daniele Simon-Thompson +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{fox2026when,
  title = {{When models choose metrics: Hidden geometry in computational biology}},
  author = {Dillion M. Fox},
  journal = {PLOS Computational Biology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014789},
  url = {https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014789},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - When models choose metrics: Hidden geometry in computational biology
AU  - Dillion M. Fox
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/17
JO  - PLOS Computational Biology
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014789
UR  - https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014789
AB  - Computational biology often turns biological measurements into fitted models, embeddings, or summaries and then compares them with a distance chosen largely by convention. That choice can shape the scientific question being answered, because different distances emphasize different assumptions about noise, variation, and biological similarity. This Perspective describes the hidden geometry that can arise when a probabilistic model is specified carefully enough to support local metric structure. For regular parametric models, the Fisher information defines a natural local metric, making distance choice part of model specification rather than a separate plotting or clustering preference. Rather than replacing familiar heuristics, information geometry helps explain when common transformations, such as variance stabilization for RNA-seq, approximate a model-implied distance; when dependence or latent nuisance structure limits that approximation; and when misspecification makes empirical, nonparametric, or sensitivity-based comparisons more appropriate. The goal is a clearer, more explicit practice of metric choice.
SN  - 1553-7358
ER  -