Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC cancer

Artificial intelligence in malignant risk assessment of oral lesions: an umbrella review.

  1. 1Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. [email protected].
  2. 2Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Background

Early detection of malignant oral lesions is crucial for their effective management. While histopathological examination is the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment planning, it is time-consuming and often inaccessible in resource-limited settings where expert evaluation and rapid diagnosis are essential. Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches offer noninvasive and rapid alternatives. AI models can significantly facilitate early detection, improve prognostic assessment, and support personalized treatment strategies, ultimately enhancing clinical outcomes and advancing precision medicine in oral oncology.Objective

The present umbrella review aimed to assess the effectiveness of AI models in detecting and predicting the malignant potential of oral lesions.Method

A comprehensive search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using the keywords "artificial intelligence", "oral lesion", and "systematic review". The eligibility of identified articles was initially assessed based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, the methodological quality of the eligible studies was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist, and studies meeting the quality standards were included for data extraction. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers, and the methodological quality of the included reviews was appraised using the AMSTAR 2 tool.Results

AI and deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and hybrid architectures, demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). Histopathology-based AI models achieved the highest diagnostic performance, with sensitivities of up to 98%, specificities of up to 95%, and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) reaching 460.83. Clinical photography and optical coherence tomography also showed high diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivities of approximately 91% and 88-90%, respectively, whereas autofluorescence imaging demonstrated comparatively lower performance. AI models achieved diagnostic sensitivity comparable to experienced clinicians while outperforming less experienced practitioners. However, heterogeneity in datasets, imaging modalities, and study methodologies limited direct comparisons across studies.Conclusion

Despite methodological limitations in most included reviews, AI models, particularly convolutional neural networks applied to histopathology and clinical photography, show promising early results and potential to approach expert-level sensitivity in controlled settings.Trial registration

Article Registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD420251021811.

Related

  1. Artificial intelligence-based tongue image analysis for non-invasive screening of gastric cancer, precancerous lesions, and related gastrointestinal disorders: a systematic review
    Rukai Wang, Chunlin Li, Hengyan Zhang +3
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. An Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Umbrella Review of Eating Disorder Meta-Analyses (2020–2025): Mapping Treatment Efficacy, Comorbidity, and Persistent Gaps in Sample Diversity
    E. Caitlin Lloyd, Pablo Del Sol Calderon, Cate Morales +6
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
  3. Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions: Evidence, Validation, and Clinical Translation
    Elettra Merola, Leonardo Sosa-Valencia, Andrea Michielan +4
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  4. Artificial intelligence (AI) in melanocytic lesions diagnosis: a systematic review of methods incorporating ABCD(E)-derived features
    Otto Muller Silva Lopes, Juliana Almeida Oliveira, Victor Brunno Alves Nogueira +5
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOncologyPMCDOAJ
  5. Artificial Intelligence in Gingival Recession Assessment and Treatment Planning: A Scoping Review
    Paweł Sieradzki, Bartłomiej Górski
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{moharrer2026artificial,
  title = {{Artificial intelligence in malignant risk assessment of oral lesions: an umbrella review.}},
  author = {Sara Monem Moharrer and Farhan Musaie and Kiarash Kiani and Mona Salighehrad},
  journal = {BMC cancer},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12885-026-16666-z},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958143},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Artificial intelligence in malignant risk assessment of oral lesions: an umbrella review.
AU  - Sara Monem Moharrer
AU  - Farhan Musaie
AU  - Kiarash Kiani
AU  - Mona Salighehrad
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/01
JO  - BMC cancer
DO  - 10.1186/s12885-026-16666-z
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42958143
AB  - Background  Early detection of malignant oral lesions is crucial for their effective management. While histopathological examination is the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment planning, it is time-consuming and often inaccessible in resource-limited settings where expert evaluation and rapid diagnosis are essential. Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches offer noninvasive and rapid alternatives. AI models can significantly facilitate early detection, improve prognostic assessment, and support personalized treatment strategies, ultimately enhancing clinical outcomes and advancing precision medicine in oral oncology.Objective  The present umbrella review aimed to assess the effectiveness of AI models in detecting and predicting the malignant potential of oral lesions.Method  A comprehensive search was conducted in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using the keywords "artificial intelligence", "oral lesion", and "systematic review". The eligibility of identified articles was initially assessed based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, the methodological quality of the eligible studies was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist, and studies meeting the quality standards were included for data extraction. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers, and the methodological quality of the included reviews was appraised using the AMSTAR 2 tool.Results  AI and deep learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and hybrid architectures, demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs). Histopathology-based AI models achieved the highest diagnostic performance, with sensitivities of up to 98%, specificities of up to 95%, and diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) reaching 460.83. Clinical photography and optical coherence tomography also showed high diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivities of approximately 91% and 88-90%, respectively, whereas autofluorescence imaging demonstrated comparatively lower performance. AI models achieved diagnostic sensitivity comparable to experienced clinicians while outperforming less experienced practitioners. However, heterogeneity in datasets, imaging modalities, and study methodologies limited direct comparisons across studies.Conclusion  Despite methodological limitations in most included reviews, AI models, particularly convolutional neural networks applied to histopathology and clinical photography, show promising early results and potential to approach expert-level sensitivity in controlled settings.Trial registration  Article Registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under registration number CRD420251021811.
SN  - 1471-2407
ER  -