Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,713 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences

Mobility of dry granular flows over contrasting erodible bed materials in laboratory experiments

  1. 1Universität der Bundeswehr München (Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Erosion and entrainment exchange mass and momentum across the flow–bed interface and can strongly modify mass-flow mobility. However, the material properties that control whether erosive flows accelerate, decelerate, or maintain their mobility remain insufficiently understood. Here, we conducted dry granular flow experiments to investigate erosion, flow evolution, and deposition across systematically imposed flow–bed contrasts, using surface measurements of the evolving flow and final deposit. A quartz slide of constant solid particle density was released over beds with lower, equal, and higher solid particle densities and compared with a reference case without erosion. Each scenario was repeated using finer sand-sized particles and coarser sand-to-gravel-sized particles. The low-density beds produced deeper erosion, higher average flow-front velocities, and longer runout. By contrast, the equal- and high-density beds produced nearly identical results, with shallower erosion depths, lower average flow-front velocities, and more compact deposits, despite their substantially different solid particle densities. The same relative patterns were observed for both particle-size fractions, although coarse-particle flows generally formed longer and flatter deposits. This asymmetric response shows that mobility cannot be explained by solid particle density alone. Instead, the enhanced mobility over the low-density beds is more consistently explained by coupled effects of lower internal friction, rounded particle shape, greater bed deformation, and more efficient entrainment. The similar response of the equal- and high-density beds reflects their comparable and higher frictional resistance and angular particle shape, which appear to outweigh the contrast in solid particle density under the tested conditions. Yet, surface-based measurements alone cannot resolve whether more subtle differences persist in basal slip, shear localization, and the incorporation of mobilized bed material. Depth-resolved observations at the flow–bed interface are therefore needed to directly relate erosion and entrainment to mass and momentum exchange.

Versions

Related

  1. Do laboratory acclimation experiments predict field responses? Cold tolerance and metabolomic divergence in Drosophila suzukii
    Bréa Raynaud-Berton, Nathalie Le Bris, Yann Guitton +1
    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text2 citedEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
  2. Automatic Extraction of a Generalized Physics‐Based Feature From Time‐Lapse Active Source Ultrasonic Waveforms for Prediction of Shear Stress in Laboratory Friction Experiments
    Prabhav Borate, Jacques Rivière, Daniel Kifer +1
    Journal of Geophysical Research: Machine Learning and ComputationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeophysics & seismologyDOAJ
  3. Pysammos 1.0.0: a discrete-to-continuum transformation Python tool to analyse the rheology of granular materials
    Claudia Elijas-Parra, Eric C. P. Breard, John P. Morrissey +2
    Geoscientific Model DevelopmentPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral earth scienceCrossref
  4. Laboratory Experiments Identify Meteoritic Organic Precursors for Chlorinated Compounds Detected by the Sample Analysis at Mars (SAM) Instrument at Gale Crater
    Angel Mojarro, Jorsua Herrera, Ainara Sistiaga +9
    Journal of Geophysical Research. PlanetsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPlanetary science & exoplanetsGeneral earth scienceHAL
  5. Particle behavior and water quality response of wildfire ash compared to laboratory heated materials
    Mrittika Hasan Rodela, Indranil Chowdhury, Amanda K. Hohner
    Water Research XPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{wetterauer2026mobility,
  title = {{Mobility of dry granular flows over contrasting erodible bed materials in laboratory experiments}},
  author = {Katharina Wetterauer and Sebastian Müller and Michael Krautblatter and Shiva P. Pudasaini and Ivo Baselt},
  journal = {Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.5194/nhess-26-5315-2026},
  url = {https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5315/2026/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Mobility of dry granular flows over contrasting erodible bed materials in laboratory experiments
AU  - Katharina Wetterauer
AU  - Sebastian Müller
AU  - Michael Krautblatter
AU  - Shiva P. Pudasaini
AU  - Ivo Baselt
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
DO  - 10.5194/nhess-26-5315-2026
UR  - https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/26/5315/2026/
AB  - Erosion and entrainment exchange mass and momentum across the flow–bed interface and can strongly modify mass-flow mobility. However, the material properties that control whether erosive flows accelerate, decelerate, or maintain their mobility remain insufficiently understood. Here, we conducted dry granular flow experiments to investigate erosion, flow evolution, and deposition across systematically imposed flow–bed contrasts, using surface measurements of the evolving flow and final deposit. A quartz slide of constant solid particle density was released over beds with lower, equal, and higher solid particle densities and compared with a reference case without erosion. Each scenario was repeated using finer sand-sized particles and coarser sand-to-gravel-sized particles. The low-density beds produced deeper erosion, higher average flow-front velocities, and longer runout. By contrast, the equal- and high-density beds produced nearly identical results, with shallower erosion depths, lower average flow-front velocities, and more compact deposits, despite their substantially different solid particle densities. The same relative patterns were observed for both particle-size fractions, although coarse-particle flows generally formed longer and flatter deposits. This asymmetric response shows that mobility cannot be explained by solid particle density alone. Instead, the enhanced mobility over the low-density beds is more consistently explained by coupled effects of lower internal friction, rounded particle shape, greater bed deformation, and more efficient entrainment. The similar response of the equal- and high-density beds reflects their comparable and higher frictional resistance and angular particle shape, which appear to outweigh the contrast in solid particle density under the tested conditions. Yet, surface-based measurements alone cannot resolve whether more subtle differences persist in basal slip, shear localization, and the incorporation of mobilized bed material. Depth-resolved observations at the flow–bed interface are therefore needed to directly relate erosion and entrainment to mass and momentum exchange.
SN  - 1684-9981
ER  -