Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,839 studies31 sourcesUpdated 35 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Immunology

Tumor antigens across cancer progression: from immune recognition and selection to precision cancer immunotherapy

  1. 1Department of Surgery and Melanoma Center, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, United States
  2. 2Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States

Abstract

Tumor antigens provide the molecular interface between malignant transformation and host immunity, but their biological significance is determined by more than their molecular existence. Antigen clonality, abundance, processing, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) presentation, dendritic-cell function, T-cell recognition, spatial immune organization, and the surrounding tumor microenvironment (TME) collectively determine whether an antigen becomes immunologically visible and therapeutically actionable. Across cancer progression, tumor-cell antigenic states and the TME undergo reciprocal selection: immune pressure can eliminate highly visible clones while favoring antigen-loss variants, HLA defects, immune exclusion, suppressive myeloid and stromal states, and treatment-resistant populations. Recent single-cell, spatial and three-dimensional imaging, as well as immunopeptidomic studies show that this evolution is heterogeneous across tumor regions and anatomical compartments rather than a uniform linear process. This review therefore advances an antigen-TME co-evolution framework linking primary tumors, lymphatic and nodal immune compartments, systemic dissemination, distant metastatic niches, therapy, minimal residual disease, and recurrence. It critically evaluates the strengths and limitations of the classical immunoediting model; compares melanoma, breast, colorectal, lung, prostate, sarcoma, and virus-associated cancers according to antigen source, clonality, presentation competence, immune architecture, and dominant therapeutic bottleneck; and examines clinical translation through checkpoint blockade, cellular therapy, vaccines, antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, immunopeptidomics, and computational antigen prediction. Particular attention is given to the gap between predicted peptide binding and verified presentation or immunogenicity, the need for longitudinal rather than single-biopsy profiling, and the requirement for prospective validation of artificial-intelligence models. The central conclusion is that tumor antigens become clinically meaningful only when antigenic state and microenvironmental context are assessed together, providing a more rigorous foundation for precision cancer immunotherapy.

Related

  1. Non-canonical open reading frame-derived antigens as emerging immune targets in cancer immunotherapy
    Ivo Fierro-Monti
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0ImmunologyFrontiersCrossref
  2. The Antigen-Presentation Bottleneck in Pediatric Solid Tumors: Developmental Antigens, MHC-I Suppression, and Therapeutic Restoration of Tumor Immune Recognition
    Wasim Iyad Ibrahim Alghoul, Zain Al-Abdeen Mohammed Qassim, Riza Jazlin Neyyappadath +4
    BiomoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textImmunologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. 860 mRNA-LNP-mediated immunomodulation for precision cancer vaccines and immunotherapy
    Akash Gupta, Kaelan Reed, Daniel Anderson +2
    Journal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyDOAJ
  4. Precision targeting of tumor-associated macrophages via a 6-substituted pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine chimeric molecule for enhanced cancer immunotherapy
    Yining Zhang, Binghao Guo, Lixiao Guo +16
    Communications ChemistryPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textImmunologyCrossref
  5. An immunosuppression imaging gauge prospectively predicts metastatic progression and immunotherapy resistance in breast cancer
    Y. Zhang, J. Wang
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textImmunologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{leong2026tumor,
  title = {{Tumor antigens across cancer progression: from immune recognition and selection to precision cancer immunotherapy}},
  author = {Stanley P. Leong},
  journal = {Frontiers in Immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1939919},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1939919},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Tumor antigens across cancer progression: from immune recognition and selection to precision cancer immunotherapy
AU  - Stanley P. Leong
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Frontiers in Immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1939919
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1939919
AB  - Tumor antigens provide the molecular interface between malignant transformation and host immunity, but their biological significance is determined by more than their molecular existence. Antigen clonality, abundance, processing, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) presentation, dendritic-cell function, T-cell recognition, spatial immune organization, and the surrounding tumor microenvironment (TME) collectively determine whether an antigen becomes immunologically visible and therapeutically actionable. Across cancer progression, tumor-cell antigenic states and the TME undergo reciprocal selection: immune pressure can eliminate highly visible clones while favoring antigen-loss variants, HLA defects, immune exclusion, suppressive myeloid and stromal states, and treatment-resistant populations. Recent single-cell, spatial and three-dimensional imaging, as well as immunopeptidomic studies show that this evolution is heterogeneous across tumor regions and anatomical compartments rather than a uniform linear process. This review therefore advances an antigen-TME co-evolution framework linking primary tumors, lymphatic and nodal immune compartments, systemic dissemination, distant metastatic niches, therapy, minimal residual disease, and recurrence. It critically evaluates the strengths and limitations of the classical immunoediting model; compares melanoma, breast, colorectal, lung, prostate, sarcoma, and virus-associated cancers according to antigen source, clonality, presentation competence, immune architecture, and dominant therapeutic bottleneck; and examines clinical translation through checkpoint blockade, cellular therapy, vaccines, antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, immunopeptidomics, and computational antigen prediction. Particular attention is given to the gap between predicted peptide binding and verified presentation or immunogenicity, the need for longitudinal rather than single-biopsy profiling, and the requirement for prospective validation of artificial-intelligence models. The central conclusion is that tumor antigens become clinically meaningful only when antigenic state and microenvironmental context are assessed together, providing a more rigorous foundation for precision cancer immunotherapy.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -