Contributions of human-caused climate change and individual emitters to global coral bleaching
- 1University of Cape Town
Abstract
Coral bleaching is among the most infamous climate impacts. Yet the extent of bleaching due to human-caused climate change, as opposed to natural El Nino variability, and the contributions of individual countries and carbon majors (fossil fuel and cement producers) remains unquantified. Here, we leverage coral monitoring globally across 4,479 sites from 1985-2024 to link specific emitters to marine heat stress and bleaching. For events with >10% of corals bleached at a site, we find that 99% (95% CI: 88-100%) were attributable to human-caused climate change. Even during major El Ninos, 97-100% of bleaching events were attributable to human-caused climate change and the extent of damage increases over time from 23% of sites bleached (95% CI: 3-35%) during 1998 to 71% of sites (95% CI: 37-85%) during 2023-2024. Emissions of the United States, the largest historical emitter, contributed to 51% (95% CI: 39-65%) of bleaching events. Emissions linked to Chevron, Saudi Aramco, Gazprom, and ExxonMobil each contributed to 14% (95% CI: 11-19%) of bleaching events -- roughly double the contribution of the 39 countries of the Alliance for Small Island States. It is virtually certain emissions of China, the United States, and Indonesia caused bleaching in their coastal waters. Strong inequalities exist where countries with high socioeconomic dependence on coral reefs experienced 54% of bleaching yet contributed only 5% to bleaching. As global warming rapidly nears levels catastrophic for warm-water corals, our results show the massive contribution from anthropogenic emissions to historical coral beaching and help fill an important evidentiary gap on accountability for non-economic loss and damage from climate change.
Related
- Direct and indirect effects: estimating the contributions along individual pathways during transient dynamics
- Delayed bleaching-induced coral mortality limits reef recovery after a marine heatwave
- Rapid coral bleaching recovery via symbiont transfer from healthy corals
- Diel thermal variability does little to mitigate bleaching in two endangered coral holobionts
- Taxon‐Specific Loss in Scleractinian Living Coral Area Following a Bleaching Event Is Linked to Reef Structural Decline in the Central Red Sea
BibTeX
@misc{trisos2026contributions,
title = {{Contributions of human-caused climate change and individual emitters to global coral bleaching}},
author = {C. Trisos and M. Kotz and P. Pande and R. Gibb and A. Meyer and O. Bates and C. Callahan and M. Donat},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.08.750055},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.08.750055v1},
note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Contributions of human-caused climate change and individual emitters to global coral bleaching
AU - C. Trisos
AU - M. Kotz
AU - P. Pande
AU - R. Gibb
AU - A. Meyer
AU - O. Bates
AU - C. Callahan
AU - M. Donat
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/08
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.09.08.750055
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.08.750055v1
AB - Coral bleaching is among the most infamous climate impacts. Yet the extent of bleaching due to human-caused climate change, as opposed to natural El Nino variability, and the contributions of individual countries and carbon majors (fossil fuel and cement producers) remains unquantified. Here, we leverage coral monitoring globally across 4,479 sites from 1985-2024 to link specific emitters to marine heat stress and bleaching. For events with >10% of corals bleached at a site, we find that 99% (95% CI: 88-100%) were attributable to human-caused climate change. Even during major El Ninos, 97-100% of bleaching events were attributable to human-caused climate change and the extent of damage increases over time from 23% of sites bleached (95% CI: 3-35%) during 1998 to 71% of sites (95% CI: 37-85%) during 2023-2024. Emissions of the United States, the largest historical emitter, contributed to 51% (95% CI: 39-65%) of bleaching events. Emissions linked to Chevron, Saudi Aramco, Gazprom, and ExxonMobil each contributed to 14% (95% CI: 11-19%) of bleaching events -- roughly double the contribution of the 39 countries of the Alliance for Small Island States. It is virtually certain emissions of China, the United States, and Indonesia caused bleaching in their coastal waters. Strong inequalities exist where countries with high socioeconomic dependence on coral reefs experienced 54% of bleaching yet contributed only 5% to bleaching. As global warming rapidly nears levels catastrophic for warm-water corals, our results show the massive contribution from anthropogenic emissions to historical coral beaching and help fill an important evidentiary gap on accountability for non-economic loss and damage from climate change.
ER -