Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Fever of Unknown Origin in Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Clinical and Laboratory Features of a Chinese Cohort

  1. 1Department of Infectious Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China
  2. 2Department of Hematology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China

Abstract

Background: Fever of unknown origin (FUO) is clinically challenging in the setting of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). This study aimed to describe the clinical and laboratory features of patients with MDS and FUO and to explore factors associated with in-hospital fever resolution. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center observational study of hospitalized patients with MDS and FUO at Peking Union Medical College Hospital, China, between January 2013 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into treatment-responsive and treatment-unresponsive groups based on fever outcomes after treatment. Demographic, clinical and laboratory features were collected and compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 98 patients were screened and 89 were included in the study. In approximately 80% of patients, FUO presented as the initial manifestation of MDS. Over half of the patients had high or very high risk per the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), and complex karyotypes were observed in 25.8% of patients. MDS subtype distribution differed significantly between the groups (p = 0.027). Lower-blast MDS (MDS-LB) was more common in the treatment-responsive group (70.3% vs. 48.1%), whereas increased-blast MDS (MDS-IB) was more frequent in the treatment-unresponsive group (16.2% vs. 42.3%). Mucocutaneous lesions were more frequent among treatment-responsive patients (54.1% vs. 21.2%; p = 0.002). A higher percentage of CD8+CD38+ T-cells was associated with favorable treatment response (66.7 [60.4,80.6] vs. 47.4 [38.5,57.7]; p = 0.003). In addition, use of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants was significantly associated with fever resolution (p = 0.004 and p = 0.043, respectively). Conclusions: In this selected cohort, MDS patients with FUO were predominantly at high risk and carried unfavorable prognostic factors. Mucocutaneous presentation and elevated CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportions were associated with in-hospital fever improvement. The association between anti-inflammatory treatment and fever resolution suggests a possible immune-mediated contribution to fever in these patients. As no non-MDS FUO comparison group was included and long-term outcomes were not available, these findings should be regarded as descriptive and hypothesis-generating.

Related

  1. Clinical Images: Collapsing auricles and airways in relapsing polychondritis with myelodysplastic syndrome
    Yuqing Dan, Liling Zhao, Qiong Fu
    ACR open rheumatologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Neurological Manifestations in Whipple's Disease: A Scoping Review of Clinical Features, Laboratory Findings, and Neuroimaging Characteristics of 111 Cases
    Lucia Moro, Domenicantonio Tropepi, Dora Buonfrate +5
    European journal of neurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. The DRESS/HLH Overlap Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Clinical Features, Triggers, and Outcomes
    Dorde Jevtic, Igor Dumic
    Journal of clinical medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Clinical and radiological features of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in children: a retrospective study
    Hua Huang, Shujuan Jiang, Huan Xu +2
    Frontiers in pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Guiding neurosurgical intervention in tuberculous meningitis: evaluation of clinical features, laboratory parameters, and outcomes with a treatment algorithm
    Ena Elizabeth L. Naoe, Edmund John B. Cayanong, Safrollah M. Guinal +7
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{liu2026fever,
  title = {{Fever of Unknown Origin in Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Clinical and Laboratory Features of a Chinese Cohort}},
  author = {Huiting Liu and Lifan Zhang and Miao Chen and Baotong Zhou and Hongwei Fan and Taisheng Li and Wei Cao},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15218249},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8249},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Fever of Unknown Origin in Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Clinical and Laboratory Features of a Chinese Cohort
AU  - Huiting Liu
AU  - Lifan Zhang
AU  - Miao Chen
AU  - Baotong Zhou
AU  - Hongwei Fan
AU  - Taisheng Li
AU  - Wei Cao
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15218249
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/21/8249
AB  - Background: Fever of unknown origin (FUO) is clinically challenging in the setting of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). This study aimed to describe the clinical and laboratory features of patients with MDS and FUO and to explore factors associated with in-hospital fever resolution. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center observational study of hospitalized patients with MDS and FUO at Peking Union Medical College Hospital, China, between January 2013 and December 2022. Patients were categorized into treatment-responsive and treatment-unresponsive groups based on fever outcomes after treatment. Demographic, clinical and laboratory features were collected and compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 98 patients were screened and 89 were included in the study. In approximately 80% of patients, FUO presented as the initial manifestation of MDS. Over half of the patients had high or very high risk per the revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R), and complex karyotypes were observed in 25.8% of patients. MDS subtype distribution differed significantly between the groups (p = 0.027). Lower-blast MDS (MDS-LB) was more common in the treatment-responsive group (70.3% vs. 48.1%), whereas increased-blast MDS (MDS-IB) was more frequent in the treatment-unresponsive group (16.2% vs. 42.3%). Mucocutaneous lesions were more frequent among treatment-responsive patients (54.1% vs. 21.2%; p = 0.002). A higher percentage of CD8+CD38+ T-cells was associated with favorable treatment response (66.7 [60.4,80.6] vs. 47.4 [38.5,57.7]; p = 0.003). In addition, use of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants was significantly associated with fever resolution (p = 0.004 and p = 0.043, respectively). Conclusions: In this selected cohort, MDS patients with FUO were predominantly at high risk and carried unfavorable prognostic factors. Mucocutaneous presentation and elevated CD8+CD38+ T-cell proportions were associated with in-hospital fever improvement. The association between anti-inflammatory treatment and fever resolution suggests a possible immune-mediated contribution to fever in these patients. As no non-MDS FUO comparison group was included and long-term outcomes were not available, these findings should be regarded as descriptive and hypothesis-generating.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -