Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Optimizing football analytics: Dimensionality reduction meets machine learning for offensive and defensive player profiling

3 more authors
15 affiliations
  1. 1Faculty of Education and Humanities, Universidad Andres Bello, Viña del Mar, Chile
  2. 2Department of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Fit Generation Research Institute, Andorra la Vella, Andorra
  3. 3Universidad de Extremadura, Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Caceres, España
  4. 4Escuela de Ingeniería Informática, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
  5. 5Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Viña del Mar, Viña del Mar, Chile
  6. 6Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Santo Tomás, Talca, Chile
  7. 7Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca, Chile
  8. 8Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Laboratory, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
  9. 9Grupo AFySE, Investigación en Actividad Física y Salud Escolar, Escuela de Pedagogía en Educación Física, Facultad de Educación, Universidad de Las Américas, Santiago, Chile
  10. 10Faculty of Physical Education, National Pedagogical University, Bogotá, Colombia
  11. 11Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Faculty of Education Sciences, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile
  12. 12School of Education, Faculty of Human Sciences, Universidad Bernardo O'Higgins, Santiago, Chile
  13. 13Faculty of Medicine, Health and Sports, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  14. 14Grupo de Investigación en Cultura, Educación y Sociedad, Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla, Colombia
  15. 15School of Medicine, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador

Abstract

Background: This study focuses on the quantitative analysis of football players’ performance based on a set of performance data. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a multivariate analytical model to identify, quantify, and predict the most relevant factors that determine the offensive and defensive profiles of professional football players, thereby optimizing functional segmentation, performance analysis, and decision-making processes in the contexts of scouting and data-based tactical planning. Materials and methods: A dataset was compiled through automated extraction (web scraping) via the Python programming language and its specialized libraries. The full dataset comprised 2,689 player–league records corresponding to 2,530 unique players from Europe’s five major UEFA-affiliated national leagues during the 2022–2023 season (159 players who transferred between two leagues mid-season contributed one record per league, 2,530 + 159 = 2,689). After applying a minimum-eligibility filter of >450 minutes played to ensure stable per-90 metrics, 1,624 player–league records (1,620 unique players) were retained for the modeling workflow. Dimensionality reduction techniques (PCA) and explainable machine learning (Shapley Additive exPlanations [SHAP]) with predictive modeling were applied. Eight algorithms were trained and compared to predict PC1 Offensive and PC1 Defensive. Results: The First Offensive Principal Component (PC1 Offensive) synthesizes actions that generate scoring opportunities, such as actions prior to shots (SCA_p90, 13.3%), progressive receptions (RecProg_p90, 13.0%) and total shots (Shots_p90, 12.7%). The first-defensive principal component (PC1 Defensive) highlights tackles (Tkl_p90, 19.1%), blocks (15.6%) and interceptions (15.6%). Conclusions: Finally, the inclusion of SHAP allows for an in-depth interpretation of the models, identifying the key statistical factors that influence players’ offensive and defensive contributions, which is valuable for scouting, tactical analysis and player development.

Related

  1. From microscopic damage to macroscopic games: a dimensionality reduction of stem cell homeostasis
    Jiguang Yu, Louis Shuo Wang, Shihan Ban +1
    Transport PhenomenaPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text5 citedGeneral mathematicsOpenAlex
  2. Greedy Orthogonal Polynomial Manifolds with Lipschitz Control for Dimensionality Reduction and Reduced Modeling
    Tomoki Koike, Benjamin Peherstorfer, Elizabeth Qian
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  3. A Smaller Subspace is All You Need: Efficient ISAC Beamforming via Dimensionality Reduction
    Ruiqi Liu, Yuanshuo Gang, Tianqi Mao +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  4. Cluster-Based Dimensionality Reduction by Nonparametric Distributional Screening
    Sanoja Jha, Rishikesh Muralimohan, Praveen Athauda Arachchi +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Variable-Projection Sparse Functional Principal Component Analysis: Interpretable Functional Dimensionality Reduction with Applications to Raman Spectral Data
    Han Ying Lim, Dharini Pathmanathan, Philipp Otto +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@article{yanezsepulveda2026optimizing,
  title = {{Optimizing football analytics: Dimensionality reduction meets machine learning for offensive and defensive player profiling}},
  author = {Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda and Aldo Vásquez-Bonilla and Rodrigo Olivares and Pablo Olivares and Guillermo Cortés-Roco and Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz and Marcelo Tuesta and Jorge Olivares-Arancibia and Boryi A. Becerra-Patiño and Juan David Paucar-Uribe and Diego Andrés Rada-Perdigón and Exal Garcia-Carrillo and Tomás Rivera-Kofler and Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez and José Francisco López-Gil},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0353239},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353239},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Optimizing football analytics: Dimensionality reduction meets machine learning for offensive and defensive player profiling
AU  - Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda
AU  - Aldo Vásquez-Bonilla
AU  - Rodrigo Olivares
AU  - Pablo Olivares
AU  - Guillermo Cortés-Roco
AU  - Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz
AU  - Marcelo Tuesta
AU  - Jorge Olivares-Arancibia
AU  - Boryi A. Becerra-Patiño
AU  - Juan David Paucar-Uribe
AU  - Diego Andrés Rada-Perdigón
AU  - Exal Garcia-Carrillo
AU  - Tomás Rivera-Kofler
AU  - Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez
AU  - José Francisco López-Gil
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/09
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0353239
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353239
AB  - Background: This study focuses on the quantitative analysis of football players’ performance based on a set of performance data. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a multivariate analytical model to identify, quantify, and predict the most relevant factors that determine the offensive and defensive profiles of professional football players, thereby optimizing functional segmentation, performance analysis, and decision-making processes in the contexts of scouting and data-based tactical planning. Materials and methods: A dataset was compiled through automated extraction (web scraping) via the Python programming language and its specialized libraries. The full dataset comprised 2,689 player–league records corresponding to 2,530 unique players from Europe’s five major UEFA-affiliated national leagues during the 2022–2023 season (159 players who transferred between two leagues mid-season contributed one record per league, 2,530 + 159 = 2,689). After applying a minimum-eligibility filter of >450 minutes played to ensure stable per-90 metrics, 1,624 player–league records (1,620 unique players) were retained for the modeling workflow. Dimensionality reduction techniques (PCA) and explainable machine learning (Shapley Additive exPlanations [SHAP]) with predictive modeling were applied. Eight algorithms were trained and compared to predict PC1 Offensive and PC1 Defensive. Results: The First Offensive Principal Component (PC1 Offensive) synthesizes actions that generate scoring opportunities, such as actions prior to shots (SCA_p90, 13.3%), progressive receptions (RecProg_p90, 13.0%) and total shots (Shots_p90, 12.7%). The first-defensive principal component (PC1 Defensive) highlights tackles (Tkl_p90, 19.1%), blocks (15.6%) and interceptions (15.6%). Conclusions: Finally, the inclusion of SHAP allows for an in-depth interpretation of the models, identifying the key statistical factors that influence players’ offensive and defensive contributions, which is valuable for scouting, tactical analysis and player development.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -