Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,869 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation for the prevention of postoperative delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

  1. 1Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic

Abstract

Background: Postoperative delirium is a common perioperative complication. Early randomised trials suggested that non-invasive brain stimulation may reduce postoperative delirium, whereas the recent MODEST trial found no preventive benefit. We synthesised the randomised evidence for perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation. Methods: We searched eight bibliographic databases and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 30 September 2026 for randomised controlled trials of perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation in adults undergoing surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative delirium. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated risk ratios (RRs), mean differences, or standardised mean differences. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Results: Nine trials contributed data from 1451 participants. Postoperative delirium occurred in 72 of 750 participants receiving active stimulation and 166 of 701 controls (RR 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.56; I2=24.7%; moderate-certainty evidence). Estimates also favoured stimulation for hypoactive and hyperactive delirium, but not clearly for mixed delirium. Pain, anxiety, and sleep outcomes favoured stimulation but were highly heterogeneous and supported by very-low-certainty evidence. Length of hospital stay was not reduced. Adverse events could not be pooled because reporting was incomplete and inconsistent. Conclusions: Perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation may reduce postoperative delirium, but the evidence does not establish a class effect or support routine clinical use. Geographical concentration, methodological concerns, heterogeneous stimulation protocols, and discordance with the MODEST trial warrant independent multicentre sham-controlled trials. PROSPERO registration: CRD420261522168 Keywords: meta-analysis; non-invasive brain stimulation; perioperative neurocognitive disorders; postoperative delirium; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Related

  1. Perioperative transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery: protocol for a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
    R. Wang, H. Yang, H. Li +5
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiamedRxiv
  2. Perioperative Interventions for Prevention of Prolonged Postoperative Ileus and Gastrointestinal Recovery After Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Cristian-Ștefan Hleșcu, Ioana Creangă-Murariu, Andreea Laura Antohi +7
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  3. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wei-Jing Zhu, Ran An, Qian-Yun Pang +1
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Transcutaneous low-level vagus nerve stimulation for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac valve surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Lindi Bian, Yuwei Shi, Tieshuai Liu +3
    BMC complementary medicine and therapiesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurologyEurope PMC
  5. Effect of alpha transcranial alternating current stimulation over the bilateral sensorimotor cortex on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery: a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial protocol
    Mingkai Zhou, Mingshu Tao, Pinghao Li +17
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefPMC
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026perioperative,
  title = {{Perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation for the prevention of postoperative delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials}},
  author = {H. Wang and L. Du and D. Li and A. Zhang and Y. Huang and X. Liu and J. Shu and H. Zhang and J. Zou and H. Pan},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.11.02.26367005},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.02.26367005v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation for the prevention of postoperative delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
AU  - H. Wang
AU  - L. Du
AU  - D. Li
AU  - A. Zhang
AU  - Y. Huang
AU  - X. Liu
AU  - J. Shu
AU  - H. Zhang
AU  - J. Zou
AU  - H. Pan
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.11.02.26367005
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.02.26367005v1
AB  - Background: Postoperative delirium is a common perioperative complication. Early randomised trials suggested that non-invasive brain stimulation may reduce postoperative delirium, whereas the recent MODEST trial found no preventive benefit. We synthesised the randomised evidence for perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation. Methods: We searched eight bibliographic databases and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 30 September 2026 for randomised controlled trials of perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation in adults undergoing surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative delirium. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated risk ratios (RRs), mean differences, or standardised mean differences. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Results: Nine trials contributed data from 1451 participants. Postoperative delirium occurred in 72 of 750 participants receiving active stimulation and 166 of 701 controls (RR 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.56; I2=24.7%; moderate-certainty evidence). Estimates also favoured stimulation for hypoactive and hyperactive delirium, but not clearly for mixed delirium. Pain, anxiety, and sleep outcomes favoured stimulation but were highly heterogeneous and supported by very-low-certainty evidence. Length of hospital stay was not reduced. Adverse events could not be pooled because reporting was incomplete and inconsistent. Conclusions: Perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation may reduce postoperative delirium, but the evidence does not establish a class effect or support routine clinical use. Geographical concentration, methodological concerns, heterogeneous stimulation protocols, and discordance with the MODEST trial warrant independent multicentre sham-controlled trials. PROSPERO registration: CRD420261522168 Keywords: meta-analysis; non-invasive brain stimulation; perioperative neurocognitive disorders; postoperative delirium; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation
ER  -