Framings of Patient Knowledge and Proximal Technologies in Type 1 Diabetes: A Hermeneutic Review Using Meta-Narrative Methods.
- 1Nuffield Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.
- 2Centre for Medical Science and Technology Studies (MeST), Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
Some people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) wear glucose sensors and pumps which use algorithms to deliver insulin automatically. These technologies require practical knowledge, yet how patients develop this knowledge remains undertheorised. We conducted a hermeneutic review, informed by meta-narrative methods, to examine how different research traditions have conceptualised patient knowledge concerning T1D proximal or wearable technologies. Using databases and snowball searches, we classified 74 articles into four research traditions, each carrying assumptions about how patients acquire, develop or enact knowledge. In biomedical literature, patients were typically seen as passive recipients of technology, with knowledge framed as factual or skills-based. Health psychology literature emphasised individual empowerment through mastery of technical skills. Design and innovation studies treated patient knowledge as an instrument for design. Social science-informed approaches focused on knowledge as a social process distributed between patients through communities of practice or centred on enacting embodied and situated knowledge. Our review shows how narrow framings risk undermining the richness of T1D knowledge practices with implications for technology development and implementation in the context of diabetes care. We argue for stronger engagement with sociologically informed approaches in future research to attend to the multiplicity of knowledge practices.
Related
- Emerging information technologies across the autism service and prevention continuum: a narrative review of screening, diagnosis, intervention, and health equity
- Thrombotic Complications in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Pathophysiology, Prevention, and Clinical Management—A Narrative Review
- The care of the contact athlete's shoulder: rotator cuff, proximal biceps, pectoralis and latissimus injuries-a narrative review.
- Precision additive manufacturing for pediatric minimally invasive surgery training in congenital gastrointestinal malformations: technologies, materials, workflow, and future perspectives: a narrative review
- Sex-specific assumptions underlie cardiovascular digital twin technologies: A narrative review
BibTeX
@article{swann2026framings,
title = {{Framings of Patient Knowledge and Proximal Technologies in Type 1 Diabetes: A Hermeneutic Review Using Meta-Narrative Methods.}},
author = {Nadia Swann and Jackie van Dael and Henriette Langstrup and Eleanor Barry and Trisha Greenhalgh and Chrysanthi Papoutsi},
journal = {Sociology of health \& illness},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1111/1467-9566.70287},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42967593},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Framings of Patient Knowledge and Proximal Technologies in Type 1 Diabetes: A Hermeneutic Review Using Meta-Narrative Methods.
AU - Nadia Swann
AU - Jackie van Dael
AU - Henriette Langstrup
AU - Eleanor Barry
AU - Trisha Greenhalgh
AU - Chrysanthi Papoutsi
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/01
JO - Sociology of health & illness
DO - 10.1111/1467-9566.70287
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42967593
AB - Some people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) wear glucose sensors and pumps which use algorithms to deliver insulin automatically. These technologies require practical knowledge, yet how patients develop this knowledge remains undertheorised. We conducted a hermeneutic review, informed by meta-narrative methods, to examine how different research traditions have conceptualised patient knowledge concerning T1D proximal or wearable technologies. Using databases and snowball searches, we classified 74 articles into four research traditions, each carrying assumptions about how patients acquire, develop or enact knowledge. In biomedical literature, patients were typically seen as passive recipients of technology, with knowledge framed as factual or skills-based. Health psychology literature emphasised individual empowerment through mastery of technical skills. Design and innovation studies treated patient knowledge as an instrument for design. Social science-informed approaches focused on knowledge as a social process distributed between patients through communities of practice or centred on enacting embodied and situated knowledge. Our review shows how narrow framings risk undermining the richness of T1D knowledge practices with implications for technology development and implementation in the context of diabetes care. We argue for stronger engagement with sociologically informed approaches in future research to attend to the multiplicity of knowledge practices.
SN - 0141-9889
SN - 1467-9566
ER -