Factors associated with short- and long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful elective electrical cardioversion
4 affiliations
- 1Pacemaker Center, University Clinical Center of Serbia
- 2Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade
- 3Cardiology Clinic, University Clinical Center of Serbia
- 4Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Hospital Center Zemun
Abstract
Introduction: Electrical cardioversion (ECV) effectively restores sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL), although arrhythmia recurrence is common. We aimed to identify factors associated with a higher probability of maintaining sinus rhythm one month after successful ECV, and after one year in those who were arrhythmia-free after the first month.
Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients who underwent elective ECV for persistent AF or AFL between January 2011 and June 2023. Clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic characteristics were analyzed to identify parameters associated with the maintenance of sinus rhythm.
Results: We included 297 ECV procedures. ECV was successful in 91.9% of patients and sinus rhythm was maintained in 89.7% of them at one month and in 40.3% at one year follow-up. Shorter arrhythmia duration (OR = 0.863, 95% CI: 0.76–0.98, p = 0.026) and ventricular pacing on the pre-procedural ECG (OR = 5.212, 95% CI: 1.16–23.48, p = 0.032) were associated with one-month success. Factors associated with one-year sinus rhythm maintenance in patients who were in sinus rhythm during monthly follow-up were smaller left atrial dimensions (OR = 0.817, 95%CI: 0.77–0.98, p = 0.022), the first-ever arrhythmia episode (OR = 3.320, 95%CI: 1.10–10.05, p = 0.034), lower CHA ₂ DS ₂ -VASc score (OR = 0.132, 95%CI: 0.03–0.54, p = 0.005), non-smoking status (OR = 0.120, 95%CI: 0.04–0.37, p < 0.001), no previous ECV (OR = 0.082, 95%CI: 0.01–0.47, p = 0.005), and antiarrhythmic therapy (OR = 2.486, 95%CI: 1.01–8.65, p = 0.05).
Conclusions: ECV is a reasonable rhythm-control strategy in AF/AFL particularly when performed early after arrhythmia onset, in non-smokers and patients with fewer comorbidities, antiarrhythmic treatment, smaller left atrium and no prior ECV.
Related
- Assessment of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Plasma Concentrations Before Elective Electrical Cardioversion
- Hemodynamic and Metabolic Predictors of Unsuccessful Electrical Cardioversion or Early Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Electrical Cardioversion
- Remimazolam for Procedural Sedation During Synchronized Electrical Cardioversion in the Emergency Department
- Successful salvage therapy with glofitamab followed by selinexor maintenance in an elderly patient with primary refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma harboring TP53 and CD58 mutations: a case report and literature review
- Parkinson’s disease is associated with increased 90-day readmission and reoperation after elective total hip arthroplasty
BibTeX
@article{radovanovic2026factors,
title = {{Factors associated with short- and long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful elective electrical cardioversion}},
author = {Nikola N. Radovanović and Nemanja S. Branković and Nikola Vujadinović and Nebojša M. Mujović and Stefan Juričić and Olga Petrović and Srdjan Raspopović and Goran Milašinović},
journal = {Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fcvm.2026.1951804},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1951804/full},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Factors associated with short- and long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful elective electrical cardioversion
AU - Nikola N. Radovanović
AU - Nemanja S. Branković
AU - Nikola Vujadinović
AU - Nebojša M. Mujović
AU - Stefan Juričić
AU - Olga Petrović
AU - Srdjan Raspopović
AU - Goran Milašinović
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/13
JO - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
DO - 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1951804
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1951804/full
AB - Introduction: Electrical cardioversion (ECV) effectively restores sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL), although arrhythmia recurrence is common. We aimed to identify factors associated with a higher probability of maintaining sinus rhythm one month after successful ECV, and after one year in those who were arrhythmia-free after the first month. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients who underwent elective ECV for persistent AF or AFL between January 2011 and June 2023. Clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic characteristics were analyzed to identify parameters associated with the maintenance of sinus rhythm. Results: We included 297 ECV procedures. ECV was successful in 91.9% of patients and sinus rhythm was maintained in 89.7% of them at one month and in 40.3% at one year follow-up. Shorter arrhythmia duration (OR = 0.863, 95% CI: 0.76–0.98, p = 0.026) and ventricular pacing on the pre-procedural ECG (OR = 5.212, 95% CI: 1.16–23.48, p = 0.032) were associated with one-month success. Factors associated with one-year sinus rhythm maintenance in patients who were in sinus rhythm during monthly follow-up were smaller left atrial dimensions (OR = 0.817, 95%CI: 0.77–0.98, p = 0.022), the first-ever arrhythmia episode (OR = 3.320, 95%CI: 1.10–10.05, p = 0.034), lower CHA ₂ DS ₂ -VASc score (OR = 0.132, 95%CI: 0.03–0.54, p = 0.005), non-smoking status (OR = 0.120, 95%CI: 0.04–0.37, p < 0.001), no previous ECV (OR = 0.082, 95%CI: 0.01–0.47, p = 0.005), and antiarrhythmic therapy (OR = 2.486, 95%CI: 1.01–8.65, p = 0.05). Conclusions: ECV is a reasonable rhythm-control strategy in AF/AFL particularly when performed early after arrhythmia onset, in non-smokers and patients with fewer comorbidities, antiarrhythmic treatment, smaller left atrium and no prior ECV.
SN - 2297-055X
ER -