Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0The Lancet
What makes a meta-analysis believable?
Related
- What Makes a Child Go Bad? Genes, Choice, and Punishment in Original Sin
- Roughness or sliminess: What makes a haptic material unpleasant
- The neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus biomarker landscape: what blood and cerebrospinal fluid analytes have been studied and how they performed? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- When location makes oxidative stress lethal: mitoxyperilysis at the immunometabolic stress interface
- Flexible compression of sensory evidence makes human decisions more resilient to noisy neural computations
BibTeX
@article{lee2026what,
title = {{What makes a meta-analysis believable?}},
author = {Matthew My Lee and Sanjay Kaul and Harlan M Krumholz and Stuart J Pocock and Carolyn Sp Lam and Faiez Zannad},
journal = {The Lancet},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/s0140-6736(26)01087-1},
url = {https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-05775991v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - What makes a meta-analysis believable?
AU - Matthew My Lee
AU - Sanjay Kaul
AU - Harlan M Krumholz
AU - Stuart J Pocock
AU - Carolyn Sp Lam
AU - Faiez Zannad
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/02
JO - The Lancet
DO - 10.1016/s0140-6736(26)01087-1
UR - https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-05775991v1
SN - 0140-6736
SN - 1474-547X
ER -