Experiences, barriers and enablers of stroke end-of-life care: a systematic review with mixed-methods synthesis.
8 affiliations
- 1School of Nursing and Midwifery, Brook Building, University of Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK. [email protected].
- 2Applied Health Research Hub, University of Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK.
- 3School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
- 4Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK.
- 5School of Nursing and Midwifery, Brook Building, University of Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK.
- 6HRH Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Centre of Islamic Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 9DA, UK.
- 7University Hospitals Dorset, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, BH7 7DW, UK.
- 8Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG51PB, UK.
Abstract
Background
Despite advances in stroke care, 12% of patients die within 30 days of stroke highlighting the requirement for high-quality end-of-life care (EoLC) within stroke services. EoLC aims to improve the quality-of-life of patients facing death whilst also supporting their families. EoLC after stroke can be difficult due to complex stroke-specific challenges and little clinical guidance. There is a lack of knowledge and understanding of current provision of poststroke EoLC and the barriers and enablers to quality EoLC. Therefore, the aim of this review was to identify the experiences, expectations, information needs and communication preferences of staff, patients and their families and loved ones regarding hospital-based EoLC after stroke.Methods
A systematic review and synthesis of research published between 2007-2023, updating and extending the 2007 review by Stevens et al. [1]. Eligibility: primary research studies; reporting the views and experiences of staff, patients and/or their families; EoLC provided to adult hospital patients with ischaemic stroke or primary intracerebral haemorrhage; EoLC provided within 30-days post-stroke; qualitative, mixed method and quantitative studies; published in English from 2007 onwards. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were searched up to November 2023.Results
A total of 28 studies were included. Most were conducted in high-income countries, predominately within hospital based services in Europe (n = 19) and North America (n = 7). Two studies were conducted in middle-income countries and none in low-income countries. Three studies used mixed methods; 13 qualitative, and 12 quantitative. Most data were from healthcare staff (n = 708), four studies included patients' (n = 367) views and experiences and nine studies included n = 251 next-of-kin. Data synthesis identified three themes describing the barriers and enablers to the delivery of effective EoLC, which can be used to support improvements in practice: 1. recognising dying within the context of uncertainty; 2. navigating relationships between staff and families; and 3. the lived experience of the stroke unit environment.Conclusions
Stroke unit EoLC is shaped by interconnected dimensions of recognising dying, prognostic uncertainty, and the culture and environment of care delivery. Limited progress in research since 2007, particularly in relation to patient-reported experiences and intervention development, underscores the need for renewed research focus to inform best practice and enhance support for patients and families.Trial registration
PROSPERO [CRD42020212895].
Related
- A qualitative exploration of variations in social prescribing in primary care for people living with dementia in England: Barriers and enablers to positive service experiences
- Enablers and barriers to Electronic Community Health Information System (eCHIS) usage in Kenya: A Work System Framework Analysis of frontline health worker experiences
- Lived experiences, barriers, and facilitators of voluntary non-suicidal self-injury disclosure among adolescents who have disclosed: a qualitative systematic review protocol
- Sickle Cell Disease Care in Jamaica: Enablers and Barriers to Healthcare Access and Hydroxyurea Utilization
- Journey to immunization service: identifying barriers and enablers to routine immunization service uptake among communities residing in urban slum areas of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2023
BibTeX
@article{gordon2026experiences,
title = {{Experiences, barriers and enablers of stroke end-of-life care: a systematic review with mixed-methods synthesis.}},
author = {Clare Gordon and Catherine Harris and Christopher Burton and Bee Wee and Catherine Davidson and Mehrunisha Suleman and Damian Jenkinson and Nikola Sprigg and Alison Rouncefield-Swales and Andrew Clegg and Caroline L Watkins and Catherine Elizabeth Lightbody},
journal = {BMC palliative care},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12904-026-02211-z},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907807},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Experiences, barriers and enablers of stroke end-of-life care: a systematic review with mixed-methods synthesis.
AU - Clare Gordon
AU - Catherine Harris
AU - Christopher Burton
AU - Bee Wee
AU - Catherine Davidson
AU - Mehrunisha Suleman
AU - Damian Jenkinson
AU - Nikola Sprigg
AU - Alison Rouncefield-Swales
AU - Andrew Clegg
AU - Caroline L Watkins
AU - Catherine Elizabeth Lightbody
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC palliative care
DO - 10.1186/s12904-026-02211-z
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42907807
AB - Background Despite advances in stroke care, 12% of patients die within 30 days of stroke highlighting the requirement for high-quality end-of-life care (EoLC) within stroke services. EoLC aims to improve the quality-of-life of patients facing death whilst also supporting their families. EoLC after stroke can be difficult due to complex stroke-specific challenges and little clinical guidance. There is a lack of knowledge and understanding of current provision of poststroke EoLC and the barriers and enablers to quality EoLC. Therefore, the aim of this review was to identify the experiences, expectations, information needs and communication preferences of staff, patients and their families and loved ones regarding hospital-based EoLC after stroke.Methods A systematic review and synthesis of research published between 2007-2023, updating and extending the 2007 review by Stevens et al. [1]. Eligibility: primary research studies; reporting the views and experiences of staff, patients and/or their families; EoLC provided to adult hospital patients with ischaemic stroke or primary intracerebral haemorrhage; EoLC provided within 30-days post-stroke; qualitative, mixed method and quantitative studies; published in English from 2007 onwards. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were searched up to November 2023.Results A total of 28 studies were included. Most were conducted in high-income countries, predominately within hospital based services in Europe (n = 19) and North America (n = 7). Two studies were conducted in middle-income countries and none in low-income countries. Three studies used mixed methods; 13 qualitative, and 12 quantitative. Most data were from healthcare staff (n = 708), four studies included patients' (n = 367) views and experiences and nine studies included n = 251 next-of-kin. Data synthesis identified three themes describing the barriers and enablers to the delivery of effective EoLC, which can be used to support improvements in practice: 1. recognising dying within the context of uncertainty; 2. navigating relationships between staff and families; and 3. the lived experience of the stroke unit environment.Conclusions Stroke unit EoLC is shaped by interconnected dimensions of recognising dying, prognostic uncertainty, and the culture and environment of care delivery. Limited progress in research since 2007, particularly in relation to patient-reported experiences and intervention development, underscores the need for renewed research focus to inform best practice and enhance support for patients and families.Trial registration PROSPERO [CRD42020212895].
SN - 1472-684X
ER -