Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Orientation refinement for nanobeam precession electron diffraction patterns using spot intensity profiles

Abstract

We develop a method to measure crystallographic orientations with high angular resolution for nano-beam precession electron diffraction patterns, and applicable to 4D scanning precession electron diffraction. We show that internal variations of intensity in the diffraction spots can be simulated and correlated to experimental variations to measure the crystallographic orientation with a much better angular resolution that with the standard method of automated crystal orientation mapping (ACOM). In a tilt series carried out with long exposure time on a monocrystal of silicon around the main goniometer tilt axis, the imposed tilt angles are retrieved with a 0.044° to 0.054° precision with refinement, against 0.25° to 0.33° with the standard method. Shorter exposure times, introducing Poisson noise, marginally degrade the precision to a 0.054° to 0.066° range. The method also corrects a systematic error of ACOM near zone axis.

Related

  1. Physics-aware global Rietveld refinement for high-energy X-ray diffraction microscopy with application to reconstructing intragranular orientation and strain fields
    Carter K. Cocke, Eitan Camacho, Sara F. Gorske +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
  2. Hierarchical Unsupervised Clustering of Nanobeam Electron Diffraction Data Using Sparse Bragg-Vector Representations
    Ian MacLaren, Ala Al-Afeef, Trevor Almeida +5
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textApplied physics & instrumentationCondensed matterarXiv
  3. Compact thermo-optic switch based on graphene-silicon nitride nanobeam cavity
    Yunjie Li, Jingming Chan, Huaixu Chen +3
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedPublisher termsOptics & photonicsCrossref
  4. Single-Photon Nonlinearity from a Nanobeam with a Quantum Dot
    Abhijit Biswas, Neelesh Kumar Vij, Allan S. Bracker +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptics & photonicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Inverse-Designed Nanobeam Cavities for High-Cooperativity Spin-Photon Interfaces in Silicon
    Nail Letty, Md Sakibul Islam, Wayesh Qarony
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{despres2026orientation,
  title = {{Orientation refinement for nanobeam precession electron diffraction patterns using spot intensity profiles}},
  author = {Arthur Després and Muriel Vérion and Edgar F. Rauch},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.02871},
  eprint = {2610.02871},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02871},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Orientation refinement for nanobeam precession electron diffraction patterns using spot intensity profiles
AU  - Arthur Després
AU  - Muriel Vérion
AU  - Edgar F. Rauch
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.02871
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.02871
AB  - We develop a method to measure crystallographic orientations with high angular resolution for nano-beam precession electron diffraction patterns, and applicable to 4D scanning precession electron diffraction. We show that internal variations of intensity in the diffraction spots can be simulated and correlated to experimental variations to measure the crystallographic orientation with a much better angular resolution that with the standard method of automated crystal orientation mapping (ACOM). In a tilt series carried out with long exposure time on a monocrystal of silicon around the main goniometer tilt axis, the imposed tilt angles are retrieved with a 0.044° to 0.054° precision with refinement, against 0.25° to 0.33° with the standard method. Shorter exposure times, introducing Poisson noise, marginally degrade the precision to a 0.054° to 0.066° range. The method also corrects a systematic error of ACOM near zone axis.
ER  -