Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Tight bounds for hybrid quantum-classical query algorithms

Abstract

We study hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the query model. The computation consists of quantum subroutines that make at most q oracle queries; between subroutines, all qubits are measured and discarded. We prove matching upper and lower bounds for several problems in this model: (i) (Unbiased) Phase estimation up to a precision ε requires Θ(1/(q ε2)) queries; (ii) (Unbiased) Amplitude estimation up to a precision ε requires Θ((p(1−p))/(q ε2)) queries; (iii) Search among N items requires Θ(N/q) queries; (iv) Two level AND-OR tree (AND of m ORs, with n inputs to each OR) requires Θ(nm/q) queries. All of these bounds are optimal up to a constant factor, for all q from 1, corresponding to the classical complexity, to Q(f), the unrestricted quantum query complexity of the respective problem. We also derive a hybrid lower bound for distinguishing two distributions specified by a state-preparation unitary; this bound is tight up to a logarithmic factor. Besides specific lower bounds, an important contribution is developing methods for proving lower bounds on hybrid quantum algorithms (which have been very ad-hoc up to now). The first two bounds follow from a common framework: we analyze probability distributions over measurement transcripts and bound a progress measure that captures their distinguishability. The AND-OR bound requires a more delicate argument, combining two progress measures that track the information available to the algorithm classically and in quantum form, respectively.

Related

  1. Tight Communication Bounds for Distributed Algorithms in the Quantum Routing Model
    Fabien Dufoulon, Frédéric Magniez, Gopal Pandurangan
    HALPreprintLicence not statedQuantum physics & quantum informationHAL
  2. The Quartic Gap Between Quantum and Dequantized Algorithms for Linear Algebra Is Tight
    Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Dylan Herman, Junhyung Lyle Kim +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Classical Algorithms for Bipartite Quantum Max-Cut on Dense Expanders
    Stuart Wayland, Zackary Jorquera, Alexandra Kolla
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Tight Universal Bounds on Quantum Data Hiding with Multipartite Werner States
    Oren Akresh, Jacob Beckey, Felix Leditzky
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Classical State Preparation for Variational Quantum Algorithms via Reinforcement Learning
    Gino Kwun, Dhanvi Bharadwaj, Gokul Subramanian Ravi
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{ambainis2026tight,
  title = {{Tight bounds for hybrid quantum-classical query algorithms}},
  author = {Andris Ambainis and András Gilyén and Martins Kokainis},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.06803},
  eprint = {2610.06803},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06803},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Tight bounds for hybrid quantum-classical query algorithms
AU  - Andris Ambainis
AU  - András Gilyén
AU  - Martins Kokainis
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.06803
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06803
AB  - We study hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the query model. The computation consists of quantum subroutines that make at most q oracle queries; between subroutines, all qubits are measured and discarded. We prove matching upper and lower bounds for several problems in this model: (i) (Unbiased) Phase estimation up to a precision ε requires Θ(1/(q ε^2)) queries; (ii) (Unbiased) Amplitude estimation up to a precision ε requires Θ((p(1−p))/(q ε^2)) queries; (iii) Search among N items requires Θ(N/q) queries; (iv) Two level AND-OR tree (AND of m ORs, with n inputs to each OR) requires Θ(nm/q) queries. All of these bounds are optimal up to a constant factor, for all q from 1, corresponding to the classical complexity, to Q(f), the unrestricted quantum query complexity of the respective problem. We also derive a hybrid lower bound for distinguishing two distributions specified by a state-preparation unitary; this bound is tight up to a logarithmic factor. Besides specific lower bounds, an important contribution is developing methods for proving lower bounds on hybrid quantum algorithms (which have been very ad-hoc up to now). The first two bounds follow from a common framework: we analyze probability distributions over measurement transcripts and bound a progress measure that captures their distinguishability. The AND-OR bound requires a more delicate argument, combining two progress measures that track the information available to the algorithm classically and in quantum form, respectively.
ER  -